Hypography Science Forums: Quantum Realism, Here, Is Not Art But Science - Hypography Science Forums

i could copy-paste some article i've previously written on NowPublic, Scribd, or Examiner but that's lazy .. for anyone curious about the 'foundations of the theory', please consult those references before asking me to explain anything .. i'm not a theoretical physicist; i'm more of a frontiersman exploring neglected domains in science .. a fair introduction to the topics resides on YouTube at TheAmazingAssh0le user page. that user name was not meant to insult anyone except TheAmazingAtheist who seems to love to criticize Everything w/out regard to validity or applicability; i appreciate his entertainment value and personal worth as a human being, but someone must 'stand up to him' in his lack of respect for 'those of faith' .. the user name does not limit the topics covered there .. there's a bit of humor and frivolity ala Monty Python there .. but quite a few installments of physics concepts relating to this blog so here and on YouTube, we are encouraged to ASK QUESTIONS such as: what is the true nature of 'the photon'?, why does energy seem to self-propagate?, what are the qualities of space-time that influence energy propagation?, if any, do they relate to properties of elementary particles?, what attributes of elementary particles relate to the existence of life?, is there such thing as 'Prime Cause'?, does it relate to our universe?, how did life begin on Earth?, what are the basic physical requirements for life?, what is the 'minimal set' of physical properties that 'set the stage' for life?, what is the simplest deterministic theory we can develop to explain chemistry and life?,.. these questions and more relate to this blog, the next phase in quantum mechanics (hopefully), and what quantum realism is. my best guesses at the moment are: temporal relativity, TR, is a generalization of GR, it's a deeper way of looking at gravitation/reality/strong-force/SR/time-dilation/matter/mass/.., curvature, elasticity, impedance, and respects those concepts as integral to a 'paradigm shift' required in physics/science for it to make actual measurable progress. science is essentially defined as testable concepts; philosophy is untestable theories about existence; convention embraces both presently. TR is testable via the associated concept of 'charged anti-photons' which in this framework mediate electromagnetism. this is a fully deterministic and causal framework totally unrelated to conventional 'inherent randomness' and forces mediated by virtual exchange. TR and 'spacelet theory' cannot be formulated in quantum field theory terms because that depends on virtual exchange which is completely exclusive; QFT does not relate to TR and spacelet theory because the primary assumptions are mutually exclusive. the overturning of Bell's theorem allows a deterministic/causal/local theory to be proposed. Bohm was a good beginning; GR-SR was a good beginning; but, reduction/virtual-exchange/inherent-randomness cannot solve everything; the conventional paradigms cannot explain gravity/mass from a holistic framework that is observationally valid. we cannot seem to detect the Higgs; we cannot observe gravitons (quantum gravity is non-renormalizable). multi-dimensional string theory is intriguing but not realistic. what is realistic? causal determinism is realistic. we must develop those foundations now .. or in 100 or 1000 years, but we must develop that framework. it is essential to a realistic/rational/causal perspective of reality and our interactions with it.