Hypography Science Forums: immortality??? - Hypography Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome! You are currently viewing the Hypography Science Forum as a guest. In order to participate in our science discussions, you should register now! Registration is free and you can use your Facebook login if you like.
  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

immortality??? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   matrixscarface 

  • Thinking
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 91
  • Joined: 22-December 04

Posted 26 February 2005 - 08:05 AM

In popular science (january 2005) There is a man named aubrey de grey. he says we can live say 5000 years? i said yea OK. but when he went into detail i became a believer of his theory. he says to replace the cell loss by engineering stem cells and reintroduce them. another is to insert "suicide" genes to go up against cell senescence and maybe cancer?? after that is to borrow genes from soil microbes and put enzymes with a taste for lysosomal junk into our systems, another is to rewire the immune system to rid the junk outside the cell and transport it inside, where lysosomes can digest it. after that is to produce chemicals that break the glucose-protein bond. then transfer mitochondrail DNA into cell nucleus for sakekeeping from mutations
I think this is VERY unlikely at this point in science. just imagine all the research and political interference, plus the cost of such a thing. i say it can, by theory. what do you all think about this
0

#2 User is offline   Queso 

  • Synesthetic
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,940
  • Joined: 23-January 05

Posted 26 February 2005 - 08:56 AM

I've heard about this too, imagine what we'd look like.
formerly known as 0rbsycli
0

#3 User is offline   Thomas 

  • Thinking
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42
  • Joined: 22-February 05

Posted 26 February 2005 - 10:03 AM

I forgot the name, but there was that crazy occult a few years ago that claimed they cloned a baby;

Their theory was that you can turn informatinon in your brain, (memories, thoughts, ect.) into information, and inject it into a clone of yourself, and keep doing this and you conciousness will live on this earth forever.

The other part of the theory involved aliens or something, :cup:

Anyway , hearing that article reminded me of that. :)
0

#4 User is offline   TeleMad 

  • Suspended
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 1,249
  • Joined: 03-June 04

Posted 26 February 2005 - 10:07 AM

Thomas said:

I forgot the name, but there was that crazy occult a few years ago that claimed they cloned a baby; ...The other part of the theory involved aliens or something, :cup:


I don't know the exact spelling, but the cult was called something like the Raelians.
0

#5 User is offline   matrixscarface 

  • Thinking
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 91
  • Joined: 22-December 04

Posted 26 February 2005 - 12:21 PM

that memory transfer i could see. because they have this brain implant named "braingate" where a armless man controled a computer mouse pointer around with his mind, it actually read his thoughts, what about kinda writing memory into a mind. that would make school a useless place
0

#6 User is offline   OpenMind5 

  • Explaining
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 544
  • Joined: 24-January 04

Posted 26 February 2005 - 12:51 PM

Immortality....*sigh* Highly overrated....
I have lived for a 1,000 years and its still the same old same...

LOL!!!
Op5
Make sure you stop...take your moment....and keep it with you!
0

#7 User is offline   Queso 

  • Synesthetic
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6,940
  • Joined: 23-January 05

Posted 26 February 2005 - 01:13 PM

Uh oh, this sounds like the Matrix.
formerly known as 0rbsycli
0

#8 User is offline   C1ay 

  • ¿42?
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 6,349
  • Joined: 14-February 05

Posted 26 February 2005 - 07:13 PM

I just saw an article recently where Ray Kurzweil predicts that if we can just live another 20 years until technology gets to a point, we'll be able to live forever. The article says,

"Kurzweil writes of millions of blood cell-sized robots, which he calls "nanobots," that will keep us forever young by swarming through the body, repairing bones, muscles, arteries and brain cells. Improvements to our genetic coding will be downloaded via the Internet. We won't even need a heart.

The claims are fantastic, but Kurzweil is no crank. He's a recipient of the $500,000 Lemelson-MIT prize, which is billed as a sort of Academy Award for inventors, and he won the 1999 National Medal of Technology Award. He has written on the emergence of intelligent machines in publications ranging from Wired to Time magazine. The Christian Science Monitor has called him a "modern Edison." He was inducted into the Inventors Hall of Fame in 2002. Perhaps the MIT graduate's most famous inventions is the first reading machine for the blind that could read any typeface."

Could the planet survive it?
Clay

Editor and Forum Administrator
stego anyone?
"There are only 10 kinds of people in the world --
.....Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
"Draw no conclusions before their time."
0

#9 User is offline   pgrmdave 

  • Existing
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2,758
  • Joined: 09-December 04

Posted 26 February 2005 - 07:57 PM

Why would people want to live forever? Or even for so long? I can understand not wanting to die young, but I wouldn't want to live for five hundred years. I also wonder what the effect on memory would be. Is the brain capable of storing one thousand years of information?
Hypography Forum Administrator
0

#10 User is offline   C1ay 

  • ¿42?
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 6,349
  • Joined: 14-February 05

Posted 27 February 2005 - 06:09 AM

pgrmdave said:

Why would people want to live forever? Or even for so long? I can understand not wanting to die young, but I wouldn't want to live for five hundred years. I also wonder what the effect on memory would be. Is the brain capable of storing one thousand years of information?


Why not? Is there any proof that there is anything waiting for us after death? If there is no heaven, no afterlife, no reincarnation or anything else I'd just as soon stay here among the living. I think the mind would just purge older memories we don't need any longer to make room for new ones.
Clay

Editor and Forum Administrator
stego anyone?
"There are only 10 kinds of people in the world --
.....Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
"Draw no conclusions before their time."
0

#11 User is offline   pgrmdave 

  • Existing
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2,758
  • Joined: 09-December 04

Posted 27 February 2005 - 06:26 AM

And if the mind purged memories, is it worth it to forget all the people you once knew? I think that I would rather live for a hundred years than for a thousand. Even if there is nothing beyond this. If I couldn't remember my mother, or father. Or if I couldn't remember what life was like when I was younger, I don't think that it would be worth being alive that long. I'm not saying that it is worthless - I think it would be interesting to see what politics would be like if we lived that long - but I don't understand the benefit.
Hypography Forum Administrator
0

#12 User is offline   C1ay 

  • ¿42?
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 6,349
  • Joined: 14-February 05

Posted 27 February 2005 - 07:11 AM

pgrmdave said:

I think it would be interesting to see what politics would be like if we lived that long


I think it would be interesting to watch technology and science.
Clay

Editor and Forum Administrator
stego anyone?
"There are only 10 kinds of people in the world --
.....Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
"Draw no conclusions before their time."
0

#13 User is offline   pgrmdave 

  • Existing
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2,758
  • Joined: 09-December 04

Posted 27 February 2005 - 07:16 AM

I think that technology and science would progress at the same, increasing rate. Technology builds off of itself, not off of the people who create it. Politics, on the other hand, is a short term game, because no politician needs to think about his or her constituents' children or grandchildren. If people lived much longer, we could take a more longterm view of things.
Hypography Forum Administrator
0

#14 User is offline   lindagarrette 

  • Explaining
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 865
  • Joined: 01-February 04

Posted 27 February 2005 - 01:14 PM

C1ay said:

Why not? Is there any proof that there is anything waiting for us after death? If there is no heaven, no afterlife, no reincarnation or anything else I'd just as soon stay here among the living. I think the mind would just purge older memories we don't need any longer to make room for new ones.
It doesn't matter if you live for a second or a thousand years or more. Your self is your physical being and your memories. Both of those are subject to constant change. Meanwhile, all you experience is the present moment.
If god existed then science would be meaningless:p
0

#15 User is offline   Thomas 

  • Thinking
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 42
  • Joined: 22-February 05

Posted 27 February 2005 - 05:19 PM

orbsycli said:

Uh oh, this sounds like the Matrix.

:) Indeed, once we find out how to get information in a liquid form, we could just inject it into the brain, or hook up a cable in the back of our heads and instantly recieve millions of bits of information , there would be not need for school, classic education. :)

Why do some people keep saying they would not want to live thousands of years? I think life is great :) - even though I do believe in an afterlife :eek: , I would still want to live for a few thousand years :P . I think It would be fun. Who cares if I don't remember all of it? :eek:
0

Share this topic:


  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


View our Science Quizzes | Science links. About the Hypography Science Forums

Friends

We recommend these stellar sites:

PC Help Forum

ATL - Atlanta Computer Repair

Sponsors

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

When we launched in May 2000, we wanted to create a site to share science-related content of all kinds on the web. As time passed, our site turned into a pure science forum with lots of cool people.

So we kept the name Hypography and the cool science forum community - and aim to be a friendly place for discussion of science topics of all kinds.