Ionized Water Systems - SCAM ?
#1
Posted 02 August 2009 - 04:09 PM
Is there any truth to the claims that drinking ionized water, especially the Kangen, which claims to be the best, will cure many kinds of illnesses and physical problems, and give you new vitality and energy?
Any knowledgable scientists out there? What do you have to say?
#2
Posted 02 August 2009 - 09:59 PM
Our bodies are self-regulating. If you drink some lemon juice, the acidic pH will be mitigated while being processed in your intestines. Otherwise, body pH levels would swing wildly, which would have devastating effects on the body.
Also, the phrase "ionized water" is very misleading. Pure water can not be ionized to any noticeable extent. Also, pure H2O is the standard by which we base alkalinity and acidity. Water is by definition, pH 7.0. The only way to change this is to add some ionic elements/compounds. Electricity needs ions to conduct, so electrolysis isn't going to accomplish much (nothing) with pure water. (this is why electrolysis is performed with some kind of ionic solution - such as salt water)
But don't take my word for it. Read here...
Quote
* "Ionized water" is nothing more than sales fiction; the term is meaningless to chemists.
* Pure water (that is, water containing no dissolved ions) is too unconductive to undergo signficant electrolysis by "water ionizer" devices.
* Pure water can never be alkaline or acidic, nor can it be made so by electrolysis. Alkaline water must contain metallic ions of some kind — most commonly, sodium, calcium or magnesium.
* The idea that one must consume alkaline water to neutralize the effects of acidic foods is ridiculous; we get rid of excess acid by exhaling carbon dioxide.
* If you do drink alkaline water, its alkalinity is quickly removed by the highly acidic gastric fluid in the stomach.
* Uptake of water occurs mainly in the intestine, not in the stomach. But when stomach contents enter the intestine, they are neutralized and made alkaline by the pancreatic secretions — so all the water you drink eventually becomes alkaline anyway.
* The claims about the health benefits of drinking alkaline water are not supported by credible scientific evidence.
* There is nothing wrong with drinking slightly acidic waters such as rainwater. "Body pH" is a meaningless concept; different parts of the body (and even of individual cells) can have widely different pH values. The pH of drinking water has zero effect on that of the blood or of the body's cells.
* If you really want to de-acidify your stomach (at the possible cost of interfering with protein digestion), why spend hundreds of dollars for an electrolysis device when you can take calcium-magnesium pills, Alka-Seltzer or Milk of Magnesia?
* Electrolysis devices are generally worthless for treating water for health enhancement, removal of common impurities, disinfection, and scale control. Claims that "ionized" waters are antioxidants are untrue; hypochlorites (present in most such waters) are in fact oxidizing agents.
"Ionized" and alkaline water: snake oil on tap
"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
#3
Posted 03 August 2009 - 02:31 PM
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath....uncleal/qz4.htm
#4
Posted 05 August 2009 - 09:26 PM
freeztar said:
Also, the phrase "ionized water" is very misleading. Pure water can not be ionized to any noticeable extent.
Well,
Read this...
Can water store charge? [Langmuir. 2009] - PubMed Result
#5
Posted 05 August 2009 - 09:41 PM
somasimple said:
I would love to read it, but I can only access the abstract.
Can you summarize its main points, please?
"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
#6
Posted 06 August 2009 - 01:15 AM
Enjoy;
BTW, it makes sense since water is a polar molecule.
ACS Publications - Cookie absent
#7
Posted 06 August 2009 - 05:18 PM
It was a very interesting read and I'm not sure what to make of it. Water as a natural battery?
But, I do not believe it gives any credence to these ionized water claims. Another study showing the health benefits of "ionized water" would be a step in the right direction for the skeptical.
"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
#8
Posted 06 August 2009 - 07:55 PM
freeztar said:
But, I do not believe it gives any credence to these ionized water claims. Another study showing the health benefits of "ionized water" would be a step in the right direction for the skeptical.
The better way to ionize water is to add salt...
#9
Posted 06 August 2009 - 08:00 PM
somasimple said:
Like...salt water?
"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
#10
Posted 06 August 2009 - 08:54 PM
Salt is Na+ and Cl-: Clearly they are ions.
Seriously, water preserves electroneutrality because it dampens all ions (electrostatic forces) in it.
Water make a shield around ions that diminishes its strength but water gets at the same time a little force from the enclosed ions. The H bonds are simply enlarged or reduced in distance...
#11
Posted 06 August 2009 - 09:40 PM
somasimple said:
Salt is Na+ and Cl-: Clearly they are ions.
Seriously, water preserves electroneutrality because it dampens all ions (electrostatic forces) in it.
Seriously, water (in its pure form) is non-ionic.
The study you have presented is interesting on its own merits, but it does not support your hypothesis.
Quote
So water makes a sheild now? Are you using the pH imbalance argument from your link?
Your link speaks for itself. I'm not a chemist, so my interpretation of it is wholly inadequate. Yet, you seem to have a strong argument. Leverage that strength if you do anything with it.
"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
#12
Posted 06 August 2009 - 09:50 PM
Diffusion MRI - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
here is a page about ion hydration: How is it possible to a ion to attract water molecules if they are non ionic?
Ion hydration and aqueous solutions of salts
#13
Posted 06 August 2009 - 09:52 PM
freeztar said:
It is not what chemists say:
Water molecule structure
#14
Posted 06 August 2009 - 10:02 PM
somasimple said:
Water molecule structure
Perhaps you'd care to update this entry then?
WikiAnswers - What type of compound is water
How are the electrons accounted for with the pure water sample?
"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
#15
Posted 06 August 2009 - 10:07 PM

The approximate shape and charge distribution of water
What is a charge?

Help
Join now


Promote to Article













