Hypography Science Forums: What If The Boson Is Not The Higgs ? - Hypography Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome! You are currently viewing the Hypography Science Forum as a guest. In order to participate in our science discussions, you should register now! Registration is free and you can use your Facebook login if you like.
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What If The Boson Is Not The Higgs ? Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Rade 

  • Understanding
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,120
  • Joined: 09-December 06

Posted 05 July 2012 - 04:55 AM

This is from the CERN web page. They make it clear that there is a possibility that the boson just announced as being discovered at 125.3 GeV (+- 0.6 at 4.9 sigma) may or may not be the Higgs Boson.

---

FROM CERN:
The new particle observed at about 125 GeV is compatible, within the limited statistical accuracy, with being the SM Higgs boson. However, more data are required to measure its properties such as decay rates in the various channels (γγ, ZZ, WW, bb and ττ) and ultimately its spin and parity, and hence ascertain whether it is indeed the SM Higgs boson or the result of new physics beyond the standard model.


---

OK, for fun, let us assume future research at CERN in 2012-2013 will suggest the new boson is NOT the Higgs. So, what would it be ?

This post has been edited by Rade: 05 July 2012 - 05:03 AM

0

#2 User is offline   CraigD 

  • Creating
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 6,945
  • Joined: 23-May 05

Posted 10 July 2012 - 04:49 PM

I (and apparently the other 77 viewer of this thread) have been bewildered trying to come up with an answer to the title question “what if the boson is not the Higgs?”

Finally, today, I encountered this Discovery.com article pointed out this arXiv preprint wherein some physicist have written about 20 pages exploring what, if not the Higgs, LHC:ATLAS and CMS may have discovered.

Their bottom line (or top line, as that’s how these papers are usually written) is that it’s most likely the “Standard Model Higgs”, but that some “Higgs imposters” remain not ruled out.

Not easy reading, nor quick, (for me, at least), but better than nothing. :reallyconfused:
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies :)
0

#3 User is offline   MacPhee 

  • Questioning
  • Group: Banned
  • Posts: 240
  • Joined: 28-November 11
  • LocationBrighton, England

Posted 11 July 2012 - 10:57 AM

View PostRade, on 05 July 2012 - 04:55 AM, said:

This is from the CERN web page. They make it clear that there is a possibility that the boson just announced as being discovered at 125.3 GeV (+- 0.6 at 4.9 sigma) may or may not be the Higgs Boson.

---

FROM CERN:
The new particle observed at about 125 GeV is compatible, within the limited statistical accuracy, with being the SM Higgs boson. However, more data are required to measure its properties such as decay rates in the various channels (γγ, ZZ, WW, bb and ττ) and ultimately its spin and parity, and hence ascertain whether it is indeed the SM Higgs boson or the result of new physics beyond the standard model.


---

OK, for fun, let us assume future research at CERN in 2012-2013 will suggest the new boson is NOT the Higgs. So, what would it be ?


It might be a different "flavor", or "color" of the Higgs Boson. Or perhaps there's a "Top" Higgs, and a "Bottom" one. Even a "Charmed" version.

Or more likely, it's all total gibberish.
Religion is a kind of first attempt at Science
-1

#4 User is offline   Rade 

  • Understanding
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,120
  • Joined: 09-December 06

Posted 11 July 2012 - 02:00 PM

View PostCraigD, on 10 July 2012 - 04:49 PM, said:

Finally, today, I encountered this Discovery.com article pointed out this arXiv preprint wherein some physicist have written about 20 pages exploring what, if not the Higgs, LHC:ATLAS and CMS may have discovered.
Thank you very much for your time to find this.

[EDIT] Here is link to more papers on Higgs boson by the lead author, Ian Low of Argonne National Lab.

http://inspirehep.ne...ind+ea+low,+ian

==

From the above preprint by Low et al. is this conclusion, which clearly suggests the possibility that what CERN has found may not be the Standard Model Higgs boson...oh, science is so much fun

"As we have seen, precise measurements of the ratios DW/Z and D/Z offer a clean way of distinguishing a triplet imposter from a Higgs boson, but currently the uncertainties in these quantities are too large, and the central values actually favor the triplet imposter."

This post has been edited by Rade: 11 July 2012 - 02:30 PM

0

#5 User is offline   Aethelwulf 

  • Explaining
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 673
  • Joined: 01-July 12

Posted 11 July 2012 - 05:05 PM

I was dogmatic that they would not find it five years ago. Now.. I seem to be put in my place... if it was not for some. John Ellis indeed as well, is keeping an open mind that the Boson is in fact not a Higgs. Not hard to imagine, but has much space been made for this particle over others that have been found? No doubt in some sadistic sense, the Higgs Boson is a particle which requires a considerable amount of effort to try and prove which is like moving mountains even a yard.
0

#6 User is offline   phision 

  • Thinking
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 96
  • Joined: 10-December 09

Posted 13 July 2012 - 03:14 AM

View PostRade, on 05 July 2012 - 04:55 AM, said:


OK, for fun, let us assume future research at CERN in 2012-2013 will suggest the new boson is NOT the Higgs. So, what would it be ?


A random clumping of matter with a particular mass/energy! The future will POSSIBLY involve CERN needing more funding to investigate further.. My understanding, cynical as it is, is that this was near the upper limit of what LHC was able to discover, and as such represented a last best chance for a discovery.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


View our Science Quizzes | Science links. About the Hypography Science Forums

Friends

We recommend these stellar sites:

PC Help Forum

ATL - Atlanta Computer Repair

Health Sphere

Sponsors

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

When we launched in May 2000, we wanted to create a site to share science-related content of all kinds on the web. As time passed, our site turned into a pure science forum with lots of cool people.

So we kept the name Hypography and the cool science forum community - and aim to be a friendly place for discussion of science topics of all kinds.