Cellular Symbiosis With Mitochondria [i]What was the motivating factor in this development & when?[/i]
Posted 17 August 2012 - 10:34 AM
I understand symbiosis when both parties benefit from an action reinforces this action. I am just curious if anyone has figured this one out by now.
Posted 17 August 2012 - 03:45 PM
Life is the poetry of the universe.
Love is the poetry of life.
You do not possess belief... Belief possesses you...
Nuclear is the only real option!
Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?" :shrug:
Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it :doh:
Feel free to visit my You-Tube Channel here.
Posted 20 August 2012 - 07:30 AM
Thanx Moontanman for the links, I read through them and enjoyed the info. What prompted this question was a thread on "curing cancer" that described a pathway of getting energy when either Mitochondria aren't readily available or properly functioning. This method was stated to be less efficient at producing energy, If this were so, this would be a motivation for the original symbiosis. So that begs the question: In which way did the Mitochondria (or whatever it ancestor that started the process) benefit? I suppose survivability might have been enhanced, since whatever was chasing down the Mitochondria would now have to deal with a bigger cell.
As you can see, Biology was not my major, though I got an A in the only course I took in Biology while in college, it was a simple freshman class that overall was quite boring. The only part that interested me was genetics, evolution, cell structure and function. All three subjects were covered in the course in less than four weeks (survey class). My interest in the three subjects has remained throughout my life.