Updates On A Toy Model Of Gravity

[Super Polymath]

So then it would be a Quantum entanglement like system.

 

 

What's ironic is that what we designed entanglement to explain (particle pairs) actually wouldn't be the result of quantum entanglement in my theory (it would be the result of gravitational interactions occurring within wave-particles [bodies smaller than a planck length]).  But yet, black body radiation is caused by a QE-like system.

Edited November 11, 2017 by Super Polymath

[Vmedvil]

So then it would be a Quantum entanglement like system.

 

 

 

Then all you have to do if that is correct is sync the ω₁ = ω₂ to generate a Black-hole Entanglement and generate a stable wormhole between two BH which is a D-Brane between them.

 

E₇ = ∇E_b(t,ω,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω₁²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

E₇ = ∇E_b(t,ω,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω₂²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

^{Which solves our L problem.}

 

 

Edited November 11, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

Then all you have to do if that is correct is sync the ω₁ = ω₂ to generate a Black-hole Entanglement and generate a stable wormhole between two BH which is a D-Brane between them.

 

E₇ = ∇E_b(t,ω,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω₁²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

E₇ = ∇E_b(t,ω,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω₂²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

^{Which solves our L problem.}

 

Let's see what 006 thinks about this modification. Thoughts? Objections? 

Edited November 11, 2017 by Super Polymath

[Vmedvil]

Let's see what 006 thinks about this modification. Thoughts? Objections? 

 

Hold on let me fuse everything.

 

[math] Planck-Curvature = \frac{2}{3} <\psi|R_{ij}|\psi> \pi (\sqrt \frac{E_8}{L_p^2 L})^3 [/math] 

 

 

Then 

 

 [math] \Delta <E> = \frac{C^4}{12 G }  \int \Delta <R_{ij}>  (\sqrt \frac{E_8}{L_p^2 L})^3 = \frac{C^4}{12 G } \int  <\psi|(R_{ij} - <\psi |R_{ij}| \psi>)|\psi> (\sqrt \frac{E_8}{L_p^2 L})^3 [/math]  

 

[math] \sqrt \frac{E_8}  { t_p^2 C^2 L}= \sqrt \frac{E_8} { L_p^2 L} =\sqrt \frac{E_8}{ E_8 E_8 L} [/math] 

 

[math] t_p^2= O^2 [/math]

[math] c^2 = P^2[/math]

 

Then all you have to do if that is correct is sync the ω_A = ω_B to generate a Black-hole Entanglement and generate a stable wormhole between two BH which is a D-Brane between them, which E₈ is the top E₈ in this situation.

 

E₈ = ∇E_b(t,k,m,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_A²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

E₈ = ∇E_b(t,k,m,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_B²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

Where 

 

 

Which

 

 

If this holds true.

 

explaining Dq which is basically where the wormhole lands or Strong Quantum Entanglement.

 

 

This being an Exact solution to Supergravity or Quantum Gravity for R_s  in Heterotic String SO(32) as the Schwarzchild metric and Kerr Metric for GR in non Planck level gravity.

Edited November 11, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

 

This being an Exact solution to Supergravity or Quantum Gravity for R_s  in Heterotic String SO(32) as the Schwarzchild metric and Kerr Metric for GR in non Planck level gravity.

 

Do you think you could take a 3 hour road-trip & have the boys at Fermilab  Muon Tevatron run a few test to confirm this for you now? Just explain some of the concepts behind this idea of this 5 dimensional hypersphere eternally absorbing itself to them - you know how non-discretely continuous (zeno's paradox) spacetime allows for two infinite quantities of temporally negative parallel universes to be perpendicular to one another at infinite points in space without one ever being able to fully consume the other. That self-absorption is behind expansion & gravity, & literally leads to electromagnetism, the weak nuclear force, & the strong nuclear force - but gravity & expansion are even more fundamental than those, which makes this self-absorption the most fundamental & really the only force behind all the forces of nature. You see with matter & energy existing as just fluctuations within the density medium of reality caused by this self-absorption, without a perpendicular anti de sitter space there would only be one solid clump with no movement or change. 

Edited November 11, 2017 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

 

 

E₈ = ∇E_b(t,k,m,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_A²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

E₈ = ∇E_b(t,k,m,R,M,I,x,y,z) = ∇(1/((1-(((2M_bG / R_s) - (I_sω_B²/2M_b)+V)²/C²))^1/2))M_bC²

 

I'm limited to basic algebra but as far as I can comprehend from what you SAY, or what you understood when you made these, is that there should be for of these, two positive, & two negative (de sitter & anti-de sitter space) written as a relation - & somehow you have to make it so the positive & negative D branes are parallel to themselves & perpendicular to each other. What you have here is just where the parallel positives touch. 

 

Also, remember:

I explained entanglement in the toy model of gravity thread & it's not the same as the first link you posted. That's the result of particle pairs being causally connected. We're not causally connected to zero point energy arising from parallel white holes the size of a particle, that has nothing to do with the quantum zeno effect. Particle pairs are causally connected beyond the speed of light because of gravity beneath the planck length. Wave particles are made out of a billion billion billion smaller particles, moving a non-wave particle (displacement) via the observer effect will cause superluminal gravitational interactions when that particle breaks up into a wace because the speed of light crosses a distance beneath the planck length at a faster rate than C. This causes a domino effect that moves (polar) displacement particle B the same state (polarization) as particle A. The billions of smaller particles that compose a wave particle were gravitationally linked over all the wave particles between particle A & B. Changing the polarization of one link in the chain changes the polarization of all of the links in the chain (zeno) ftl. Weak qe

 

 

use this math form

Edited November 12, 2017 by Super Polymath

[Vmedvil]

I'm limited to basic algebra but as far as I can comprehend from what you SAY, or what you understood when you made these, is that there should be for of these, two positive, & two negative (de sitter & anti-de sitter space) written as a relation - & somehow you have to make it so the positive & negative D branes are parallel to themselves & perpendicular to each other. What you have here is just where the parallel positives touch. 

 

Also, remember:

 

 

use this math form

 

It is in that form just V₁ = C  and C₁-C₂ = 0 at R_s , I am taking it that form angular momentum versus gravity, where V₂ = Velocity which is the V term you see.

 

This is the Schwarzchild Metric and Kerr Metric as a single equation along with SR.

 

C₁

and 

 

C₁ - C₂

 

Though, they are transformed to equal C and not g_uv

 

Then as V solution.

 

Edited November 13, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

Idk, you should be able to tell the speed of weak entanglement with these equations & you do didn't seem to know it in the other thread. We know it's over 10,000C

Edited November 12, 2017 by Super Polymath

[Vmedvil]

Idk, you should be able to tell the speed of weak entanglement with these equations & you do didn't seem to know it in the other thread. We know it's over 10,000C

 

It still errors above C, so no actually I cannot.

[Super Polymath]

More importantly & the point of all of this, we've defined missing elements like de & dm, we have 5 dimensions & 5 forces of nature, so ultimately we need that exact survival probability. Then we can get stable fusion, we can bypass C in our communications, & most pertinent of all we know where particles are waves & where they aren't, that has massive implications for nano-robotics-replication-assembly. If we need platinum we can make it from anything. That's what you Esub8 should be telling, the speed of weak entanglement & the survival probability. Graphically it should be telling us that.

 

 

Though, I understand that requires hella calculations.

[Vmedvil]

More importantly & the point of all of this, we've defined missing elements like de & dm, we have 5 dimensions & 5 forces of nature, so ultimately we need that exact survival probability. Then we can get stable fusion, we can bypass C in our communications, & most pertinent of all we know where particles are waves & where they aren't, that has massive implications for nano-robotics-replication-assembly. If we need platinum we can make it from anything. That's what you Esub8 should be telling, the speed of weak entanglement & the survival probability. Graphically it should be telling us that.

 

 

Though, I understand that requires hella calculations.

 

My Computer would stack on that equation even at four cores to 4.0 ghz 

 

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115072

Edited November 12, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

It still errors above C, so no actually I cannot.

It still errors above C, so no actually I cannot.

It still errors above C, so no actually I cannot.

So we still don't have L.

 

Like I said, you should have 4 Esub8s, two for parallel de sitter D branes at the p's & q's where they merge, & two for anti de sitter space, where the parallel -D branes touch. They're asymmetric but still causally connected beyond C. That heterotic string dimensions that is s in both de sitter & anti de sitter space that connects & inhabits the other four dimensions as the 3rd of 5 total dimensions, has infinite relativistic C transformations as de sitter & anti de sitter perpendicular spaces get closer & closer to each other at points nigh-infinitely shorter than the planck length.

Edited November 12, 2017 by Super Polymath

[Super Polymath]

My Computer would stack on that equation even at four cores to 4.0 ghz 

 

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115072

This is why you'll only get approval approximates. But how accurate are these approximates. Good enough for stable fusion reactions or wave collapse predictions is good enough. Which is why it needs to go to the test phase now.

[Vmedvil]

So we still don't have L.

 

Like I said, you should have 4 Esub8s, two for parallel de sitter D branes at the p's & q's where they merge, & two for anti de sitter space, where the parallel -D branes touch. They're asymmetric but still causally connected beyond C. That heterotic string dimensions that is s in both de sitter & anti de sitter space that connects & inhabits the other four dimensions as the 3rd of 5 total dimensions, has infinite relativistic C transformations as de sitter & anti de sitter perpendicular spaces get closer & closer to each other & points nigh-infinitely shorter than the planck length.

 

Well, that is not how the equation works remember when we defined C as relative the C is getting longer by a degree but I don't know certain variables of the D brane like when C dilates ω = k + m, but what is curvature and permeability there.

Edited November 12, 2017 by Vmedvil

[Super Polymath]

Well, that is not how the equation works remember when we defined C as relative the C is getting longer by a degree but I don't know certain variables of the D brane.

There are infinite variables down to fractional infinity, you never get to the center of the heterotic string. Treat that as the Mandelbrot set. The smallest fluctuations that lead to gravity (dm) & expansion (de) occur @ infinitely small scales. So just get an approximate.

[Vmedvil]

There are infinite variables down to fractional infinity, you never get to the center of the heterotic string. Treat that as the Mandelbrot set. The smallest fluctuations that lead to gravity (dm) & expansion (de) occur @ infinitely small scales. So just get an approximate.

 

It is being treated as that set but I still don't know k and m for a wormhole.

[Super Polymath]

You have k and m where de sitter & anti de sitter spaces touch, not just where the normal d branes touch (p's & q's)

Edited November 12, 2017 by Super Polymath