how old is the earth?
#31
Posted 05 December 2005 - 05:02 PM
"With a big enough engine, even a brick will fly." -Law of Aerospace
#32
Posted 05 December 2005 - 05:13 PM
Erasmus00 said:
-Will
True, true. Copernicus was a Catholic priest, almost a bishop. Indeed, in the entire history of western thought, what professed atheist ever rose to significant prominence between the times of Galen and Nietzsche (1700 odd years)?
But that is neither here nor there. A thinking man has to view the evidence. Until more accurate tests become available, we have to accept the inaccuacies of those we have now (which are still overwhelmingly supported by the weight of all of the evidence). If we can agree that the current combined methods of scientific dating is likely to be accurate to within an order of magnitude (or even two), Goku's argument is moot. As far as this conversation is concerned, what's an extra zero here or there? Use the bible for what it's good for - living your life, not for dating the universe or critiquing scientific evidence.
Leaving scientific inquiry to scientists should not negate your belief. Rather than uselessly trying to refute what does not fit with what you think of God, see the beauty evident in evolution, biology, chemistry and physics - there's plenty of it. How can you claim to understand God or his creation is by reading only a single book? Find a pattern in the way things are designed; that is the foundation of all inquiry. If you wish to see the creator, Goku, study the creation.
#33
Posted 06 December 2005 - 03:15 AM
"if my nose was running money, i'd blow it all on you"
evolution, ha, if these so called evolutionists wanted to be different they would have said life has always been here. the Bible has done called shotgun on there being a begining.
#34
Posted 06 December 2005 - 02:12 PM
goku said:
In their efforts to debunk the Shroud of Turin, scientists used one of the capes of Loius XIII (or XV, I forget), which was made from a material known to be of the same age. Unfortunately, we don't have any materials much older than this, at least any that we're willing to destroy in order to provide corroberative dates to every rock and bone that we find. Scientists have to extrapolate beyond those dates. Radiocarbon dating, by itself, is not considered to be accurate beyond 40k years or so, so other systems are used(ice cores, changes in the earth's magnetic field, etc).
#35
Posted 06 December 2005 - 04:57 PM
goku said:
Radiocarbon dating can only estimate time since death, so you’d want to compare the estimates to the animals known date of death, not birth.
#36
Posted 06 December 2005 - 08:04 PM
rockytriton said:
It means in the manner of a decorative collar of Elizabethan England.
#37
Posted 06 December 2005 - 08:10 PM
jkellmd said:
Well said.
#38
Posted 16 December 2005 - 12:28 PM
goku said:
As a result, continental exposure, weathering, and erosion of some shales leads to the release and transport of these elements and molecules via surface and ground water systems. The Colorado River is today experiencing a salinity and selenium problem due primarily to the large amount of black shale outcropping within its river basin.
And if you know anything about how deleterious salinity is to agriculture, wildlife, humans; and then couple that with how scarce water is in the western half of the United States, you will understand what a serious problem this is.
YECism can't even come close to helping scientists understand how to deal with these sorts of issues. If it did, you can bet your bottom dollar we'd be using YEC models instead of old earth ones.
#39
Posted 16 December 2005 - 12:37 PM
goku said:
If you're referring to dating something like a dead deer found on the side of the road, that's not possible. Dating techniques have upper and lower age limits.
#40
Posted 16 December 2005 - 03:04 PM
LOC said:
As a result, continental exposure, weathering, and erosion of some shales leads to the release and transport of these elements and molecules via surface and ground water systems. The Colorado River is today experiencing a salinity and selenium problem due primarily to the large amount of black shale outcropping within its river basin.
Informative and compelling, LOC; Thanks!
#41
Posted 16 December 2005 - 03:29 PM
jkellmd said:
Good question. I would say more than people imagine. Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson are probably among the most prominent Americans (although Franklin is perhaps a European-American). In Europe you are bound to find many more however and d'Holbach, Hume, Rosseau and Adam Smith are examples who predate Nietzsche.
The problem is of course that atheists were hunted down and burnt at the stake by the Inquisition or whoever was in charge of the church / politics at various times, so people like Hobbes and Marlowe denied being atheists although they most likely were.
Please try out our new Creativity Forums! Log in with your Science Forums credentials.
Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
#42
Posted 16 December 2005 - 04:49 PM
goku said:
Really? It doesn't appear to be simple to me. How salty would it be if the Earth were billions of years old? Indeed, how salty for millions of years? In fact, how salty is it now? What units are you measuring saltiness in? What is the rate of increase in saltiness over time?
Son many things I don't even begin to understand about this.
#43
Posted 16 December 2005 - 11:31 PM
the ocean as of now is quite salty. In fact it has enough salt to make anyone throw up. This may sound stupid but I know, I've swollowed ocean water(and threw up) but it was an accident. Anyway I have to ask the same question: How do you measure the saltiness of ocean water?
#44
Posted 17 December 2005 - 12:58 AM
The average salinity in the ocean is around 35 PSU(=PPT)
In general, salinity is measured by a CTD instrument, which measures conductivity, temperature and pressure directly.
From conductivity and temperature, you can estimate salinity, since conductivity in a solution is mainly a function of salinity and temperature.
- Time is fun when we're having flies. - Kermit the frog
Let's BOINC for Hypography! || MyBoincStats ||Hypography BoincStats
#45
Posted 17 December 2005 - 09:16 PM
Interesting sidenote: Back when we were still fish, sperm had a medium (seawater) in which to swim to the egg cells. Land animals had to invent a way of protecting sperm cells on their journey outside the male body to get to the egg, so they don't dry out and die. Here's the amazing bit: The salinity, conductivity and pH of sexual fluids is identical to that of seawater. And it's been a couple 'o million years since we've last been at sea!
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
Ecce bos taurus justitia

Help
Join now



Promote to Article














