Hypography Science Forums: God doesn't play dice.....meaning - Hypography Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome! You are currently viewing the Hypography Science Forum as a guest. In order to participate in our science discussions, you should register now! Registration is free and you can use your Facebook login if you like.
  • 7 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

God doesn't play dice.....meaning Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Kizzi 

  • Questioning
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 104
  • Joined: 04-June 05

Posted 04 September 2005 - 07:03 AM

From what I understand Einstein was refering to the probabilities of Quantum Mechanics when he said "God doesn't play dice".
Actually I'm not sure I understand at all.
What was he refering to when he said "God doesn't play dice".
Was he an Atheist?

KiZzI :lol:
0

#2 User is offline   infamous 

  • Visions of grandeur
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,869
  • Joined: 28-December 04

Posted 04 September 2005 - 07:17 AM

Kizzi said:

From what I understand Einstein was refering to the probabilities of Quantum Mechanics when he said "God doesn't play dice".
Actually I'm not sure I understand at all.
What was he refering to when he said "God doesn't play dice".
Was he an Atheist?

KiZzI :lol:
He was questioning the notion of randomness as opposed to determinism. Determinism is defined as understanding every event in nature as having a particular cause. Randomness defines an aspect in nature that has only a probability such as in quantum uncertainty. In plain English, the difference between free will and no free will.
Tolstoy wrote; "men only learn when they're suffering". The question is; how much do you want to learn?
0

#3 User is offline   Kizzi 

  • Questioning
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 104
  • Joined: 04-June 05

Posted 04 September 2005 - 08:07 AM

So randomness equates to free will, Determinism equates to no free will?

But surely if God doesn't play dice we have no free will ........ because unless God plays dice he would have thrown the outcome! Surely he want's us to determine our outcome - so he plays dice.

So when Einstein said "God does not play dice" he meant ~people have no free will~.... it was determined by God!

So Einstein believed God determines the outcome of everything leaving nothing to chance!

Also, am I correct in saying Einstein believed in God?

(I've always had a problem understanding things, ...... need clarification)

KiZzI :lol:
1

#4 User is offline   CraigD 

  • Creating
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 6,945
  • Joined: 23-May 05

Posted 04 September 2005 - 08:19 AM

Kizzi said:

What was he refering to when he said "God doesn't play dice".

He was referring to one of the consequences of the interpretation of Quantum Physics commonly called the Copenhagen Interpretation (see “criticisms” for a reference to the Einstein quote). Under this interpretation, the universe – precisely, the quantum wave function (conventionally represented by the Greek letter Psi) describing every particle in the universe – has one value/state before a specific measurement is made, then, following the measurement, “renormalizes” to a value where the measurement made has a 100% chance of having occurred.

For example, if a single photon is emitted toward a pair of closely-spaced slits in a diffraction grating, the wave function predicts a 50% chance that it will pass through one slit, a 50% chance that it will pass thought another, and no chance that anything else will happen to it. A measurement can be made to determine which slit the photon actually passes throught – blocking one slit, for instance, and detecting if it arrives at a photographic plate or electronic photomultiplier. The act of making this measurement is the equivalent of rolling a die, or flipping a coin, yet, according to the Copenhagen Interpretation, its outcome has a real and measurable impact on the future of the universe. This bothered Einstein, and continues to bother people to this day, in a way he was unable to express more clearly than with his famous quote.

Quote

Was he an Atheist?
No. Although raised Jewish, Einstein did not believe in the tenants of Judaism. He expressly and in writing denied belief in a “personal God”, writing

Quote

I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fates and actions of human beings.
Briefly put, belief in “Spinoza’s God” is the belief that “God”, “nature”, “the universe”, and “everything there is” are all words or phrases describing the same thing.

This belief, a common one among scientists and mathematicians, is important to know was shared by Einstein if you wish to understand quotes of his like “"God does not play dice". What he actually meant was “the universe is not random, but deterministic”.
0

#5 User is offline   Perspicacious 

  • Thinking
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 19
  • Joined: 23-August 05

Posted 04 September 2005 - 09:32 AM

Kizzi said:

From what I understand Einstein was refering to the probabilities of Quantum Mechanics when he said "God doesn't play dice".
Actually I'm not sure I understand at all.
What was he refering to when he said "God doesn't play dice".
Einstein was a pantheist. The following links explain Einstein's religious beliefs:

http://members.aol.c...t1/einstein.htm
http://www.harrison.dircon.co.uk/wpm
0

#6 User is offline   Dark Mind 

  • Resident White Hat
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,271
  • Joined: 03-February 05

Posted 04 September 2005 - 12:18 PM

After reading the posts thus far I believe this thread belongs in either the Philosophy and Humanities Forum or the Theology Forum. I am going to move it to the Philosophy and Humanities Forum for now, but if someone believes it is better suited in the Theology Forum please let me know and either I or another Moderator will move it there. I will leave the redirect in the Physics and Mathematics Forum, though.
Dark Mind :hihi:...
Hypography Science Forums

Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
-Unknown
0

#7 User is offline   Dark Mind 

  • Resident White Hat
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,271
  • Joined: 03-February 05

Posted 04 September 2005 - 12:32 PM

Whoops :). After thinking about it, this should be in the Philosophy of Science Forum :lol:.
Dark Mind :hihi:...
Hypography Science Forums

Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
-Unknown
0

#8 User is offline   paultrr 

  • Explaining
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 648
  • Joined: 21-November 04

Posted 04 September 2005 - 04:03 PM

Do not damn yourself for asking a valid question no matter where this question actually belongs. Einstein believed in order. He also subscribed to what we term determinism. To him certain aspects of quantum theory ran counter to determinism which bothered Einstein and seemed to conflect with his world view as one might call it. His God was order and nothing more. We have simular arguments going even today over this same issue. I do not personally subscribe to absolute determinism as several of us do accept the idea of free will within the confines of say natural law. But some do like Einstein see everything as ordered, so to speak.
0

#9 User is offline   Pret 

  • Thinking
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 17
  • Joined: 05-September 05

Posted 05 September 2005 - 06:30 AM

After listening to a public lecture by "Stephen Hawking" titled "Does God Play Dice", i came to the conclusion that, Einstein was disappointed by the apparent Randomness in nature. By his statement, that has a historical importance,"God, does not play dice", Einstein meant, "All the indeterminism or uncertainty was only provisional. Everythin is bound by undrlying reality which defined position and speeds of all particles which evolve according to deterministic principles."

But in his public lecture, Hawking says,"Einstein's view was based on, wat is now called, hidden variable theory.(He said something about Bell's experiments, which i don remember exactly, from which he concluded....).....God is bound by the Uncertainty Principle, and can not know both the position, and the speed, of a particle. So God does play dice with the universe. All the evidence points to him being a gambler, who throws the dice on every possible occasion.

Fellas if i'm wrong somewhere, please do correct me, as i still am a newbie in Quantum Physics.
0

#10 User is offline   Tormod 

  • Hypographer
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14,103
  • Joined: 11-February 02
  • LocationOslo, Norway

Posted 05 September 2005 - 09:24 AM

Pret said:

Fellas if i'm wrong somewhere, please do correct me, as i still am a newbie in Quantum Physics.


There would be no right or wrong in this issue. It's mostly up to personal interpretation, IMHO.
:) Your Friendly Neighborhood Administrator - Please help us by reporting bugs and problems via our Bug Tracker!

Please try out our new Creativity Forums!

Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality.
- Carl Sagan
0

#11 User is offline   Dark Mind 

  • Resident White Hat
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,271
  • Joined: 03-February 05

Posted 05 September 2005 - 09:29 AM

Hence why it's now in the Philosophy of Science Forum now :lol:.
Dark Mind :hihi:...
Hypography Science Forums

Never argue with an idiot. They'll drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
-Unknown
0

#12 User is offline   HydrogenBond 

  • Creating
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2,770
  • Joined: 31-August 05

Posted 21 September 2005 - 12:35 PM

I believe that Einstein was expressing intelligent design with a scientific twist; the universe happened in a logically orderred way based on simple scientific design, like e=mc2. Random based theory opens the door to all kinds of theoretical speculation because anything can happen using a random perception of the universe. If one assumes a logically orderred universe, then we as humans can narrow out search and reach the truth faster. With an approach too heavily dependant on randon, the path to truth is longer and slower. Just look at the amount of speculation centered around genetic mutations. It appears to say so much without saying anything. Ironically, if one proposes any logical order to mutations one is looked at as though they have three eyes. Randon creates many more jobs, many more experts and many more theories. The drunk takes much longer during his random walk home, while the sober man gets home quicker because he walks straight. If the sober man get there too fast, he much be drunk (irony).
0

#13 User is offline   Theophilus 

  • Thinking
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 06-October 05

Posted 06 October 2005 - 11:09 AM

I can't find a reference, but I thought the actual quote was "He is not playing at dice."
Although this particular statement does not mention God, Einstein spoke frequently of God (whatever he meant by that term) as illustrated in this set of quotes
http://www.quotation...lbert_Einstein/

In his later years, he also wrote extensively about the place of religion - essentially a sociological function.

In regard to belief, I think it is fair to characterize him as a mystic.
0

#14 User is offline   CraigD 

  • Creating
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 6,945
  • Joined: 23-May 05

Posted 06 October 2005 - 01:03 PM

Theophilus said:

I can't find a reference, but I thought the actual quote was "He is not playing at dice."
Although this particular statement does not mention God
Most sources, such at this wikipedia one, give the quote as “God doesn’t play dice”. Since, to my knowledge, Einstein never published anything containing the quote, I suspect the precise wording may never be known with certainty. I believe, though, it’s clear that he and his correspondents understood that he was talking about God, specifically “Spinoza’s god. There’s reliable evidence he stated this often and plainly, such as in an 4/24/1921 interview with Herbert Goldstein. It’s clear this is what Bohr tought he meant, from his reply "Einstein, don't tell God what to do".

Quote

In regard to belief, I think it is fair to characterize him as a mystic.
I agree. I think this is true of many excelent scientists, though whether it enhances or hurts their science, I can’t hazard a guess.

PS: welcome, Theophilus, to science forums. Please be kind to the atheistic and agnostic scientists among us. I hope you’ll find our discussions of the relationship between science and relegion illuminating, and bring a helpful voice into them.
1

#15 User is offline   Turtle 

  • Kelly
  • View blog
  • View gallery
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 15,128
  • Joined: 17-January 05

Posted 06 October 2005 - 01:10 PM

I think Albert meant to express an intuitive insight that probability is wholly inadequate to explain/model quantum effects; just my intuitive two cents. :hyper:
0

Share this topic:


  • 7 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users


View our Science Quizzes | Science links. About the Hypography Science Forums

Friends

We recommend these stellar sites:

PC Help Forum

ATL - Atlanta Computer Repair

Health Sphere

Sponsors

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

When we launched in May 2000, we wanted to create a site to share science-related content of all kinds on the web. As time passed, our site turned into a pure science forum with lots of cool people.

So we kept the name Hypography and the cool science forum community - and aim to be a friendly place for discussion of science topics of all kinds.