Chacmool said:
Yes sorry. I got a bit excited.( It was a very long article (7 pages))
It was such a good, well written article that summarises everything I have been raving on about on this thread, + some.
The NY Times is a such great paper.
You just don't see such sane,well-researched, well written, in depth articles in many papers here anymore.
Chacmool said:
I posted this (following) last month on the Obesity thread.
It seems obesity genes can be activated in utro
Quote
Given that the offspring of mothers who were underfed for the entire duration of their pregnancies are known to be permanently underweight this finding is remarkable indeed.
Alan Jones and M. I. Friedman from Pitzer college tested this Hungerwinter on animals.
In their initial studies they fed pregnant rats 50% of their normal rations for the first 2/3ds of their pregnancies and then allowed them to eat freely for the final trimester.
These rats ultimately gave birth to pups that had body weights that were the same as those born to normally fed mothers.
However, weeks later, after weaning on to a high fat diet, the male-but not the female- offspring of the malnourished mothers ate more and gained more weight than did the offspring of the normally fed mothers.
(even though the offspring of the normally fed mothers were weaned onto the same high fat diet.)
The fat cells of the obese males were larger and there fat pads weighed two to three times the fat pads of the normal males.
FROM:
P118-119
The Dependent Gene"
Prof. David S. Moore, Times BooksNYNY 2001
(For, why this may be so? read p 119-121)

Help
Join now


Promote to Article









