Hypography Science Forums: arkain101 - Viewing Profile - Hypography Science Forums

I'm flattered by the long term memory of this thread and grateful for the amazing contributions.

I think I may have had other things in life that took me away from the forum, so I forget where the topic ended up going.

It's sad to hear that thunderbird passed away.

What beautiful minds we have in this community.


I have been busy with life and I think firing this topic back up again would be a great idea.

I have tons of fresh new insights to discuss.

I think that... these pursuits awaken the mind, and bring awareness to aspects of reality that many people may never reach in their lives.

Just as a child progesses into an adult and the person goes through a process of developing awareness; this topic and its insights may push the very frontier of the awareness.

well I must run.

Thats interesting to see Little Bang.

The principle I was bringing forth comes from pure simple mechanics, where I take into consideration any di pole or any magnet for that matter must have some form of length or size. And therefore in a free open environment, statistically attractive should always win because if it spins the magnets the attractive side becomes closer than the repulsive and the momentum of the object moving away is over powered by the attractive force.

Which I suppose may not be true if one could align some magnets in such a way that you make them fly apart.. but realistically.. Is that even possible in a enviroment like open space.

Got the pics working properly.

I found it interesting that through this theoretical view there is produced a chart if you will of the building blocks of interaction. This chart is exactly the same as the Elementary Particles chart in that:

1) there is 3 groups. (deflection, bond, and false)

2)The deflection group has 6 possibilities, the bond group has 6 possibilities, and the false group has 4 possibilities

3) There is the same number in total and the same number of groups and same number in each group.

The false "particles" if you will mean that they are illogical interactions. The false would represent the force carriers. Photon, Gluon, W and Z Boson.


These are the absolutely only possible as well as the total possible interactions between a pair of point particles. This is the road map for any existing 'thing'.



{frame A} = [frame B]

{ + => - } = [ - => 0 ] (deflection)
{ + => 0 } = [ 0 => + ] (deflection)
{ + => - } = [ - => - ] (bond)
{ + => 0 } = [ - => 0 ] (bond)
{ + => - } = [ 0 => - ] (false)

{ - => + } = [ + => 0 ] (deflection)
{ - => 0 } = [ 0 => - ] (deflection)
{ - => + } = [ + => + ] (bond)
{ - => 0 } = [ + => 0 ] (bond)
{ - => + } = [ 0 => + ] (false)

{ 0 => + } = [ + => 0 ] (deflection)
{ 0 => - } = [ - => 0 ] (deflection)
{ 0 => + } = [ + => + ] (bond)
{ 0 => - } = [ - => - ] (bond)
{ 0 => - } = [ 0 => 0 ] (false)
{ 0 => + } = [ 0 => 0 ] (false)

Those are great Pyrotex.

Quote

First, can time travel back and forth?

My investigation tells me that you see time as a line. A line with a beginning and an end that possibly everything travels along. Like how we express evolutionary history or something like this on a time line.

However, there are various interpretations of what time is and what time can be defined by and as.

If you consider the night sky an observation of time unfolding, different distances being different times, then yes time does flow in all directions. The light leaving you goes into the past. The past event from far away flows towards your future so on and so forth.

Time measured by a clock is a wrapped up ruler stick. It measures increments at a specific velocity for a given distance and repeats this order as needed in order to deal with distances and velocities itself.

There are many questions science HAS not answered. However, to say that science CAN not answer a question is a bit far stretched.

Science is, a method backed up by knowledge and information. So can investigation, knowledge, and information answer any question? As long as the question itself is built from the knowledge and information in some form.. as long as it connects logically. Otherwise, you will have to change the way you think, and invent something new in order to deal with the unknown.