Help
Welcome! You are currently viewing the Hypography Science Forum as a guest. In order to participate in our science discussions, you should register now! Registration is free and you can use your Facebook login if you like.
Join now
Sign in
ughaibu's Profile
User Rating:
Find My Content
Display name history
Reputation: 30835
Excellent
- Group:
- Members
- Active Posts:
- 1,471 (0.63 per day)
- Most Active In:
- Theology forum (389 posts)
- Joined:
- 15-January 06
- Profile Views:
- 2,011
- Last Active:
Dec 10 2011 10:21 PM- Currently:
- Offline
My Information
- Member Title:
- Creating
- Age:
- Age Unknown
- Birthday:
- Birthday Unknown
- Gender:
-
Not Telling
Contact Information
- E-mail:
- Click here to e-mail me
Posts I've Made
-
In Topic: Simple technical question.
19 January 2010 - 07:29 PM
Ben said:
Well, as you apparently didn't understand anything I wrote, my time too has been wasted. Kindly stay out of this thread.THAT convinces me I have wasted my time -
In Topic: Simple technical question.
19 January 2010 - 06:49 AM
Ben said:
Yes, I know, and thanks for your patient and thoughtful input.ughaibu: You really should try to clarify what you are trying to doBen said:
Without worrying about this, consider the following alternative scenario:what do you mean by saying that "the inequality was generated by assuming that a/b < 1"?
if I have some formula which generates x for all n such that n>1 and is an integer, if I can prove that for the base case of n=2 then x=1, is the establishment of (n/n-1)>x>(n-1/n) sufficient to conclude that x=1 for all cases? -
In Topic: Simple technical question.
18 January 2010 - 08:29 PM
CraigD said:
Sure, as a general statement it's obviously false. The situation here is that a/b=1 by examination for the base case, and both the larger and smaller terms tend to 1 in higher cases. However, the inequality was generated by assuming that a/b isn't equal to 1.This seems so obvious, I suspect I may be misunderstanding the question -
In Topic: Simple technical question.
13 January 2010 - 04:55 AM
Ben said:
Dont worry about it, I suspected that I didn't have enough and Lawcat convinced me. I think I've found a different way to do it.Why do you think induction is the right approach here? -
In Topic: Simple technical question.
08 January 2010 - 02:30 AM
I see. Thank you for that, I'll think about it some more.
Comments
ughaibu
17 Jun 2008 - 07:58REASON
17 Jun 2008 - 06:36Turtle
04 May 2008 - 11:32ughaibu
03 May 2008 - 23:01Turtle
30 Apr 2008 - 20:38ughaibu
01 Apr 2008 - 15:38Turtle
01 Apr 2008 - 10:18ughaibu
31 Mar 2008 - 18:01Turtle
31 Mar 2008 - 12:32