Hypography Science Forums: Mercedes Benzene - Viewing Profile - Hypography Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome! You are currently viewing the Hypography Science Forum as a guest. In order to participate in our science discussions, you should register now! Registration is free and you can use your Facebook login if you like.

Mercedes Benzene's Profile User Rating: -----

Reputation: 109699 Excellent
Group:
Members
Active Posts:
2,945 (1.15 per day)
Most Active In:
Chemistry (335 posts)
Joined:
11-May 06
Profile Views:
10,336
Last Active:
User is offline Dec 23 2012 08:59 PM
Currently:
Offline

My Information

Member Title:
Student
Age:
Age Unknown
Birthday:
July 13
Gender:
Male Male
Interests:
Synthetic organic chemistry.

Contact Information

E-mail:
Click here to e-mail me

Converted

Biography:
Your friendly, extraordinary chemistry enthusiast.
Location:
Montgomery County, Maryland
Occupation:
Student

Latest Visitors

Posts I've Made

  1. In Topic: Does Anyone Know Which Animal Left This Print?

    17 January 2011 - 10:35 AM

    View PostMintaka, on 17 January 2011 - 10:08 AM, said:

    Someone said it's an eagle, but I can't believe this.


    That is definitely *not* the print of an eagle. It looks somewhat canine, but I can't identify it for sure.
  2. In Topic: Wikileaks Opinions?

    12 December 2010 - 05:25 PM

    View PostJay-qu, on 12 December 2010 - 05:11 PM, said:

    ...we (by majority) choose them for the job and we can remove that job from them. They are making decisions for all of us and I don't see why they should be allowed to hide any reasoning for the decisions and/or actions they make/take.


    Exactly. We elect them because we have faith that they will act in our best interests. If that means hiding information, whose publicity has the potential to hurt us, then they should certainly have that responsibility.

    How would you feel if your credit card information was leaked to the public? Your medical records, revealing that you have HIV? A text conversation that shows that you're talking behind your best friend's back? Or that your significant-other is cheating on you?
  3. In Topic: Wikileaks Opinions?

    12 December 2010 - 04:11 PM

    View PostC1ay, on 12 December 2010 - 04:03 PM, said:

    That doesn't make Wikileaks publication wrong though. It was wrong for the information to be stolen and passed on. The onus for that is on the thief, not Wikileaks. BTW, just because some information is classified doesn't mean it should be. Corrupt officials will classify information to cover their ass by hiding it and that information does need to be made public.


    Even if Wikileaks isn't the one *doing* the theft, it's still publicly disclosing classified material... which is wrong.

    And I'm not saying that all classified material should be classified material, but that's not up for us to decide. The government has very right to classify what it wants, and we should not have any say in the matter. It's just like USPS. Anything that we put in the mail becomes federal "property." It is unlawful for anyone (but the intended recipient) to tamper with material that is sent through the postal system. In essence, this becomes "classified" material. Regardless of whether or not this material *should* be classified is a moot point. The rules are there.
  4. In Topic: Wikileaks Opinions?

    11 December 2010 - 04:42 PM

    I'm all for free speech, but that's not the issue at hand here. I am 100% against Wikileaks. The information released is *classified*. There's no question about that. If it was public record, then it wouldn't be a problem, but the fact is this information was not intended to be seen by the public. It shouldn't matter whether the release of these documents is good, bad, or inconsequential for people's lives or American politics. The fact that the government doesn't want it to be public information should be respected.

    If anyone in the US has a proven relationship to the release of these documents, they should be charged with sedition and executed.

    This doesn't send a message of free speech. In fact, it's the opposite. It sends a message of inflammation and disrespect.
  5. In Topic: Dining Out

    11 December 2010 - 04:29 AM

    I voted "every day" because I'm a university student on a campus meal plan and never cook my own meals. When I'm home with family, I generally eat dinner out twice a week with them, and I generally dine out for lunch a couple times a week with friends.

Comments

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  1. Photo

    Turtle 

    31 Oct 2012 - 23:41
    good to see you haven't falled off this rock either. :thumbs_up
  2. Photo

    Turtle 

    31 Oct 2012 - 23:41
    good to see you haven't falled off this rock either. :thumbs_up
  3. Photo

    Turtle 

    12 Apr 2012 - 20:50
    helllloooooo!! good to see you. own your own lab yet?
  4. Photo

    Turtle 

    12 Apr 2012 - 20:50
    helllloooooo!! good to see you. own your own lab yet?
  5. Photo

    Turtle 

    08 Dec 2010 - 20:06
    hey der! what's up buttercup? :)
  6. Photo

    Turtle 

    13 Sep 2010 - 18:14
    just checkin' in to see if i get a reaction. lol (boy do i miss my smilies here!! :cry:)
  7. Photo

    Pyrotex 

    05 Sep 2010 - 08:17
    Does that chemical diagram in your avatar represent a REAL molecule that actually exists or can be made in the lab? What's its name?
  8. Photo

    Turtle 

    19 Aug 2010 - 09:48
    got your prussian blue message, but can't figure out how to reply to it. :shrug: anyway, been going through old stuff too & trying to decide how to get rid of some of it so i better pass on the addition. lol i'm about ready to just throw those 2 volumes of fuller's synergetics in the recycle & be done with them too.
    starting school soon? over...
    so you starting sc...
  9. Photo

    Turtle 

    15 Jul 2010 - 06:22
    no worries. i've been checking your bloggy to make sure you're minding your p's & q's. alles gut. :hihi:
  10. Photo

    pamela 

    13 Jul 2010 - 14:35
    Happy Birthday!!!!! i miss you
  11. Photo

    Turtle 

    13 Jul 2010 - 12:31
    :xparty::singer::xmas_sheep::bdayparty::xmas_gift:
  12. Photo

    Turtle 

    23 May 2010 - 11:48
    it's fascinating! :thumbs_up i appreciate your taking time to expalin some of it to me as i never pursued its study to a satisfactory degree. not that i'm ever satisfied of course. ;) just updated myself on your updates & sounds like you'll be spending a lot of time in the lab. can you wear shorts in there? plaid is big this year i think. :rotfl: do they make a black plaid? well, thanks for the knowledge & the outland view. :turtle: :clue: :)
  13. Photo

    modest 

    21 May 2010 - 00:55
    "photoswitchable catalysts" :D What an interesting research topic! When I was 15 I worked in the art dept. of a screen printing company, and it became a hobby of mine to try and convert the photosensitive [-]emulation[/-] [edit: emulsion... fracking spell checker] into a photosensitive adhesive (something that I'd never heard of at the time, but thought it would be really cool). I never did get anywhere with it. I will be following your blog with interest, and would love to hear about the research :) ... if it wouldn't be revealing any trade secrets ;)
  14. Photo

    Turtle 

    17 May 2010 - 13:44
    mmmm... so does that mean you can turn a reaction off by turning on light, as well as turn a reaction on by turning on light? or is that what you aim to find out? :smart: anyway, bon voyage! :airplane:
  15. Photo

    Turtle 

    17 May 2010 - 05:24
    i've got it bookmarked. :read: :D no worries about being around; i understand the student life. :xparty: erhm...i mean :read: :graduate: so photosensitive switching huh? is that a plant thing at all? :tree: :clue:
  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

View our Science Quizzes | Science links. About the Hypography Science Forums

Friends

We recommend these stellar sites:

PC Help Forum

ATL - Atlanta Computer Repair

Health Sphere

Sponsors

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

When we launched in May 2000, we wanted to create a site to share science-related content of all kinds on the web. As time passed, our site turned into a pure science forum with lots of cool people.

So we kept the name Hypography and the cool science forum community - and aim to be a friendly place for discussion of science topics of all kinds.