Freddy's Profile
Reputation: 10670
Excellent
- Group:
- Members
- Active Posts:
- 466 (0.21 per day)
- Most Active In:
- Political sciences (175 posts)
- Joined:
- 13-May 06
- Profile Views:
- 807
- Last Active:
Sep 18 2010 05:53 PM- Currently:
- Offline
My Information
- Member Title:
- Understanding
- Age:
- Age Unknown
- Birthday:
- July 6
- Gender:
-
Not Telling
Contact Information
- E-mail:
- Click here to e-mail me
Converted
- Biography:
- Master of Ed. in History
- Location:
- Worcester, MA
- Interests:
- lap swimmer
- Occupation:
- History Teacher
Posts I've Made
-
In Topic: Pyramids of Giza Made Out of Concrete
18 September 2010 - 05:57 PM
clapstyx, on 17 August 2010 - 12:34 AM, said:Re clever ancients
I would say they must have shared and developed their ideals quite freely.
Here is another article that supports the concrete theory.
"Barsoum, a professor of materials engineering, said microscope, X-ray and chemical analysis of scraps of stone from the pyramids "suggest a small but significant percentage of blocks on the higher portions of the pyramids were cast" from concrete.
He stressed that he believes that most of the blocks in the Khufu Pyramid were carved in the manner long suggested by archaeologists. "But 10 or 20 percent were probably cast in areas where it would have been highly difficult to position blocks," he said."
http://www.nytimes.c...=1&pagewanted=2 -
In Topic: Jesus is a God of Love
03 July 2008 - 04:07 PM
I wonder if Phelps himself has ever protested at a funeral? His daughter has come to MA to protest. State and local police keep them out of eyeshot and earshot of the mourners in an enclosed area. -
In Topic: USA FArm Subsidies.Socialism? Corporate welfare?
06 June 2008 - 01:45 PM
Cedars said:
I dont see how you conclude reducing farmland caused the profit per acre to triple. Grimm never did take the farmland out of production, but was considering it at this one point in his (unknown) farming career. He was considering it due to commodity prices being so low there was no profit. His wheat profit is likely a temporary condition market wise and likely shifted greatly from last year for Grimm, due to an unusually cold and wet spring in MN.
One or two years of positive gains and profits does not negate the actual history of commodity profits for farmers and their downward spiral over the last 65 years.
Nobody with any experience in the world of commodities trading understands this margin of increase and will tell you the product is over-valued by speculators. This signals to me it is a temporary condition on that alone, without adding in the fact that more acreage (over 5 million acres) has been reintroduced into commodity growth between 06 and 07 in the USA alone.
I havent been following the weather in the Ukraine area this year to see if the drought there has been relieved yet (the start of the increased wheat run in the fall of 06 or 05 I cant remember which) nor have I followed the wheat conditions of australia (another supposed source of the wheat run by India).
I have spent no time on the falling dollar value making US commodity markets more attractive to other countries either. Another (hopefully) temporary condition.
BTW, a baker can produce around 70 loaves of bread per 50 lbs of wheat flour. This is pure wheat flour, and not a mixed grain breads.
Also, there is a significant amount of farmland formerly planted with wheat which is now planted with corn because planting corn is more profitable. This has contributed to the rise in wheat prices. -
In Topic: USA FArm Subsidies.Socialism? Corporate welfare?
05 June 2008 - 03:35 PM
Cedars said:
Ah, Grimm and his 30 acres of wheat on steeply rolling land. 30 x 300 = $9000 dollars. But this isnt farm subsidy money so its irrelevant.
I did look up and 1 bushel of wheat produces around 50 lbs of flour. Should help you do the math on what the farmers take per loaf of bread is. Thats whole wheat, not wonder bread which is a mix of several grains.
No, it is not irrelevant! It clearly shows that by taking and reducing farm land the profit per acre has tippled. Now farmers can make more money by farming than by taking subsidies or other payments. It is the simple economics of supply and demand, when supply is down and demand is up then prices rise. It makes economic sense to grow more crops. -
In Topic: USA FArm Subsidies.Socialism? Corporate welfare?
04 June 2008 - 02:11 PM
Cedars said:
no. The subsidies are price supports. Paying for land set asides is related to conservation of both land and waters.
Freeztar posted links in Post #15.
Now go back to your baker and ask how many ounces of wheat in a loaf of bread before you jump to conclusions on how rich farmers are getting off subsidies and where your actual cost increase is originating at.
Whether land is used for conservation or any other non-farm use does not matter. The fact is that reduction of arable land means less supply and higher prices. The reference you suggested confirms this no matter how noble the motive.
"Even with reduced yields because of a dry year, Grimm made a profit of about $300 an acre after expenses. CRP would have paid just over $100 an acre."
Friends
Freddy hasn't added any friends yet.

Help
Join now
Find My Content
Display name history
Comments
Freddy has no profile comments yet. Why not say hello?