Help
Welcome! You are currently viewing the Hypography Science Forum as a guest. In order to participate in our science discussions, you should register now! Registration is free and you can use your Facebook login if you like.
Join now
Sign in
LaurieAG's Profile
User Rating:
Find My Content
Display name history
Reputation: 34506
Excellent
- Group:
- Members
- Active Posts:
- 994 (0.46 per day)
- Most Active In:
- Political sciences (170 posts)
- Joined:
- 17-June 06
- Profile Views:
- 3,864
- Last Active:
Yesterday, 08:50 PM- Currently:
- Offline
My Information
- Member Title:
- Explaining
- Age:
- 52 years old
- Birthday:
- November 9, 1959
- Gender:
-
Male
Contact Information
- E-mail:
- Click here to e-mail me
- Website URL:
-
http://www.onthenet.com.au/~laurieag/index.htm
Converted
- Location:
- South East Queensland, Australia
- Interests:
- Sudoku, Kites, reading, writing poetry, ancient and modern history, surfing
Posts I've Made
-
In Topic: Why The Market Doesnt Need Gvernment Regulation
Yesterday, 02:44 AM
I don't think too many people noticed that just before the politicians severely regulated the real worlds rockets and bombs they deregulated the financial worlds economic rockets and allowed some of them to become bombs. -
In Topic: Problems With Dark Matter
Yesterday, 02:24 AM
Hi Jay-qu,
Jay-qu, on 23 May 2012 - 01:26 AM, said:Just yesterday a new result was published showing that study to be incorrect. They made an incorrect assumption about how stars move within our galaxy, see here for the details: http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4033
Quote
We show that this result is incorrect and that it arises from the invalid assumption that the mean azimuthal velocity of the stellar tracers is independent of Galactocentric radius at all heights; the correct assumption---that is, the one supported by data---is that the circular speed is independent of radius in the mid-plane.
This seems to imply that dark matter is exclusively associated with non mid plane observations where the circular speed is dependent on the mid plane Galactocentric radius. When the non mid plane circular speeds are considered independent of the Galactocentric radius of the mid plane minimal anti matter is detected.
So, in a nutshell, anti matter is the difference between perceiving non mid plane circular speeds as being either independent of or dependent on the mid plane Galactocentric radius. -
In Topic: The 1/89 lemma
22 May 2012 - 01:21 AM
Hi Jess,
pascal, on 22 May 2012 - 12:59 AM, said:So the 1/89 match to Fib is just an amazing coincidence?
It might not be a coincidence.
http://en.wikibooks....ic-time_Version
Quote
Logarithmic-time Version
This version squares the Fibonacci transformation, allowing calculations in log2(n) time: -
In Topic: Perhaps Something Easier To Understand.
22 May 2012 - 12:57 AM
Hi Doctordick,
Doctordick, on 17 May 2012 - 01:49 PM, said:Now I am quite sure there are those reading this who will hold that the symbology used in language are not arbitrary but, if that were the case, why would any peoples speak or write in different languages?
Bill Clinton might have been interested but that was over a decade ago.
Doctordick, on 17 May 2012 - 01:49 PM, said:represents the validity of the hypothetical circumstance being represented
You just have to google boolean differentials to see how this works in its correct context.
Quote
This short introduction into the Boolean Differential Calculus and the presentation of some applications show the usefulness of this theory. If it is combined with the appropriate software and a high-level description of the problems to be solved, then it can be highly important for many applications of logic functions, particularly for the design and analysis of hardware in many areas. The inclusion into courses and educational processes of Engineers and Computer Scientists should be self-evident. -
In Topic: Dimensionless Constants
03 March 2012 - 02:29 AM
Hi Don, please note the corrections in the previous post,
Quote
So you see, the fine structure constant contains information about prime numbers, polygonal numbers, other dimensionless constants, energy scales and who knows what else.
The fine structure constant wiki talks about observations of pulsars that give a varying measured constant and even the hubble constant is not exactly constant. msowww.anu.edu.au/~charley/papers/LineweaverDavisSciAm.pdf.
section 4.3 of www.mso.anu.edu.au/~charley/papers/DavisLineweaver04.pdf is also interesting.
More on that later.
A single observation period viewing the three objects below would capture 3 equal units of the amount of light captured from object (1) if they were all at the same distance from the observer rotating around separate galactic centers of the same diameter at different speeds.
Object (1) has emission x, rotates around its galactic center once and the light emitted travels Distance (time of one circumference) to the observer.
Object (2) has emission 4x, rotates around its galactic center 0.25 and the light emitted travels the same Distance to the observer.
Object (3) has emission x/4, rotates around its galactic center 4 times and the light emitted travels the same Distance to the observer.
3 units of light are captured from 5.25x emissions. The inverse square law gives a consolidated mass of 13/3 Pi r ^ 3 if the 3 objects have the same density and r is the radius of object (1). It's probably easier to grasp if you consider the observation Period of the capture as the Depth Of Field of the observation because, perceptually at least, that is where the light from the rotating objects are being 'observed'.
Comments
Turtle
10 Nov 2011 - 20:31Turtle
19 Jun 2011 - 18:15Turtle
28 Jan 2010 - 06:35LaurieAG
29 Apr 2008 - 12:41DougF
28 Apr 2008 - 17:53Michaelangelica
16 Apr 2008 - 00:55