kvraghavaiah's Profile
Reputation: 9
Neutral
- Group:
- Members
- Active Posts:
- 35 (0.02 per day)
- Most Active In:
- Silly Claims Forum (10 posts)
- Joined:
- 12-November 06
- Profile Views:
- 1,372
- Last Active:
Apr 27 2011 07:54 AM- Currently:
- Offline
My Information
- Member Title:
- Curious
- Age:
- 26 years old
- Birthday:
- May 27, 1985
- Gender:
-
Not Telling
Contact Information
- E-mail:
- Click here to e-mail me
Converted
- Biography:
- I am a B.Tech. graduate from andhrapradesh,INDIA.I am a thinking person.
- Location:
- nellore,AP,INDIA.
- Interests:
- reading books, seeing science websites,business news
- Occupation:
- software engineer
Topics I've Started
-
Creation-bramha
22 March 2011 - 07:02 AM
Many things are not explainable by conventional scientific logic. No one knows what an electron is and what the magnetic field is actually and how they are as they are. Innumerous animals and plants live on tough earth for millions of years. This is an impossible and complex life environment for the size and hospitality of the Earth for all these to live naturally. For example, human body is very complex with innumerous mechanisms running it with full cooperation. This complexity would not evolve as told by the materialistic evolution theories. Even if evolved so, would not remain longer than a little while in the Earth’s environment. An atomic particle penetrates infinite barrier wall when it is not able to jump over it, which is in-explainable logically. There are weapons like Brahmastra, which destroy things with un-understandable through materialistic science driving source in the weapon. A curse can work. So, many things that we know are not interpretable in our minds through materialistic logic. Even the things that we think as understood well are not actually interpretable logically if analyzed
at the basic level.
So, all the things are happening miraculously or in a manner un-interpretable through materialistic logic. Any illogical thing is possible to happen if it is not actually happening but it is only an illusion to mind as if it is happening. For example; a man can have wings, light may travel in a zigzag manner through space, things may be repelled by the gravitational force and any law of nature is possible to exist in dream (imagination) with out need for logic. The objects and rules are applicable in illusions also in the same way. That means, every thing we sense or perceive in this universe is an illusion without need for logic. If a thing in this universe is not an illusion, it can not exist because it can not exist logically. Any rules seen in the illusion universe are just the rules in illusion, not the logically (really) existing rules. It is a rule in the illusion that there exists gravitational force of attraction between any two objects. Actually objects are illusion and the gravitational force too.
When you talk to your friend (illusion), you act to him as you will (think, decide). So, ‘you’ are ‘a willing object undergoing illusion’. When you will to walk, you walk (get walking illusion). When you will to talk, you talk (get talking illusion). But, it will not rain by your will to have rain. That means, ‘you’ and the ‘illusion’ are bound together with certain rules of illusion.
You get the illusion without creating it. That means, there are at least two objects (you and the illusion creating system) in relation to the illusion. So, there may be one to any number of illusion imposed objects like ‘you’ under the illusion creating system. Let us call the illusion creating system as PARABRAMHA, ‘will undergoing illusion’ as ATMA and the illusion as MAYA.
The logic or theory of the reality of PARABRAMHA is beyond our (ATMA’s) scope as ATMAs are objects being done by PARABRAMHA and are not at a higher or equal level as PARABRAMHA or in a level to observe and understand the reality of PARABRAMHA. The science understandable by us (ATMAs) is the rules in the illusion which we (they) feel.
Take the MAYA and the PARABRAMHA what belong to ‘you’ for consideration. Analysis of the number of MAYAs or PARABRAMHAs is beyond the need and scope.
Consider the case of many ATMAs in the MAYA. What happens in the illusion (MAYA) when you are having conversation with your friend is explained as follows. As an ATMA is bound to the illusion for its experiences, ATMA to ATMA direct interaction does not exist. You do illusion conversation with your illusion-friend (not real friend ATMA). At the same time, ‘your friend ATMA’ does illusion conversation with illusion-you (not ‘you’, your illusion). ‘Your illusion’ and ‘your friend illusion’ are in the only one MAYA which is being done by PARABRAMHA. So, ‘you’ do (will) as ‘your illusion’ does and ‘your friend ATMA’ does (wills) as ‘your friend-illusion’ does. Here, either the MAYA should be behaving as per the wills of ATMAs or the ATMAs should be willing as per the MAYA. All living beings do not take birth and death on their will. Many of their thought and dreams come without their known effort. This means, all ATMAs’ will is controlled as per the MAYA. So, if the ATMAs are having wills as per the MAYA, they should be done by the same system which does the MAYA. So, the ATMAs and the MAYA are bonded and are done by the PARABRAMHA.
conclusion:The PARABRAMHA/BRAMHA is the only reality. The MAYA and the ATMAs are
done by and internal to the PARABRAMHA.
Hi friends, this is not a spam topic. This is a really good theory. It is available in the books of 'hinduism'. Just I re-wrote for better clarity. -
Life In The Universe
02 September 2010 - 10:04 PM
LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE
Abstract:A living being is a concrete object which does peculiar actions. Living beings can be classified in to two categories with respect to human sense. One category is sensible living beings; which are like animals, plants, etc. The second category is super sensual living beings; whose activities are not identifiable through sense organs and so they are not generally identifiable through sense organs directly.
Key words: living being, super natural force, life
Introduction:This paper gives universal definition for ‘living being’ and explains the characteristics of living beings with examples. Living beings are categorized in this paper. This paper includes explanation on super sensual living beings, which are known as super natural forces. A formula, derived from the definition to quantify the livelihood of a living being is provided.
Index:
1. Living Being (definition and explanation)
2. Categorization of living beings
3. Characteristics of living beings
4. Quantification of livelihood
Appendix (Definitions)
1. Living Being (definition and explanation):
Definition:
A living being is a concrete object which does peculiar (strange/abnormal/distinguished) actions.
Explanation:
We call the concrete objects with distinguished (peculiar/strange/abnormal) properties in the nature as living beings. The entire natural animal and plant world on earth has got some common properties like having genes, reproducing, growing, consuming food, etc; though these are not the properties by which we perceive them as living beings primarily; and these need not be the properties for living beings through out the universe.
Living beings are just objects (to be understood as concrete matter objects) doing peculiar activities in their environment.
Generally the action peculiarity of an object comes by its operational complexity and operational complexity comes by its complex structure.
For example, if we consider human,
Human is known as a living being because human sees, walks, eats, talks, thinks, etc.; all of which are distinguished/peculiar activities in nature. All these are peculiar activities because they are very complex (This complexity is rare) activities in nature. Human has got this operational complexity by his complex body organization (structure).
2. Categorization of living beings:Categorization 1:
A. Sensible Living Beings:
The living beings, whose livelihood (peculiar actions) can be identified through sense organs directly.
E.g.: We can identify the actins of an animal (making sounds, walking, eating, etc). We can identify the growth, flowering and giving of fruits in trees. So their
Peculiar actions (livelihood) are sensible.
We can identify the activities of a microbe by seeing through a microscope (using the sense organ - eye for identification).
B. Super Sensual Living Beings:
The living beings whose livelihood can not be identified through sense organs directly, but may be identifiable indirectly through the identification and understanding of their effects on their environment. Super sensual living beings are living objects, which do not have sensually directly identifiable peculiar actions of living; but have peculiar actions through interactions like electro-magnetic interactions, electric interactions, magnetic interactions, etc…; within themselves and the environment. For example, we can not identify a computer as executing an application by seeing the CPU hardware box of a computer. We can identify the computer as a working machine only by observing it through a monitor designed to observe the computer. Similarly, we may not be able to directly identify some super sensual living beings in the nature, which are a part of it; as they do not exhibit any sensually directly identifiable activities. Let us consider a model(Model for illustration, not proposed) for a natural super sensual living being
Gods’ idols and dhvajasthambas in temples:
1. The idols of Gods are mostly stones or alloys, which are all metallic and so they can sense and process the radiation signals around them in a very good manner. Thus, they can easily interact with humans’ brain (super sensual system in brain) and other super sensual living beings.
2. Dhvajasthambas, which are tall poles existing in temples contain pancha-loha (Alloy of Gold, Silver, Copper, Zinc and Iron) as the external covering layer and flag shaped top. A Dhvajasthamba is fixed in front of the God’s idol in the temple. This pole, which has metallic outer layer acts as an antenna and processor system, that establishes communication between the Gods idol in the temple and other super sensual networks in its environment through radiation. Thus, devotees can better communicate with the bigger
super sensual systems through the god’s idol and dhvajasthambas in the temple. Actually, nothing in this universe can be super natural. Some of the super sensual living beings are considered as super natural forces in some literatures, as they could not be identified directly. Like the sensible living beings on earth form a very complex environment, super sensual living beings also possess a structured and complex environment in the universe and so on the Earth also. These living beings can affect or interact with the sensible living beings and the environment in which super sensual living beings exist. It is possible that some systems in our bodies can interact with super sensual living beings or be super sensual living beings themselves. An animal body cell can function as an animal’s fundamental building unit and some part of the cell could be also working as a building block of a super sensual system.
We some times get some thoughts, dreams, sixth sense of some things happening or going to happen due to this type of interaction of some bridge system in our brain or our environment with brain and some super sensual natural living system in the environment. That super sensual system can be a very big network spread over the earth or in the universe.
Categorization 2:
A. Natural Living Beings: These are the living beings existing naturally. These can be either sensible living beings or super sensual living beings.
B. Artificial living beings: Computers and other man made electronic machines are artificial living beings as they behave peculiarly. Artificial living beings can be either sensible living beings like mechanical engines or super sensual living beings like computer processing units.
3. Characteristics of living beings:1. The peculiar activities of some living beings can be directly sensed through sense organs and identified. In the case of some living beings, their livelihood can not be identified directly through sense organs, but can be sometimes understood by observing their effects on their environment (that is, their indirect effects can be sensed and from the analysis of their indirect effects, existence of corresponding living beings can be understood). Let us call the living beings with directly identifiable livelihood as sensible living beings and the latter as super sensual living beings.
2. Living beings interact with their environment.
3. Since environmental conditions and/or constituent elements of a concrete object can change with time and place in the universe, livelihood of a concrete object can change with time and place.
4. A concrete object can be a compound living being. In a compound living being, different living beings share the same matter content and are either dependent on each other or independent on each other for survival.
Example 1: A computer can act as both a part of internet and as an independent system. Here, internet is a lively network and an independent computer also is a lively system. So, internet is a compound lively system where many lively sub systems coexist in it.
Example 2: A man lives as a sensible living being while some part of his brain is a super sensual living being or part of a super sensual living network.
Example 3: The Earth can be considered as a big living being because of its very peculiar properties in the known universe. Animals and trees are small living beings on the Earth.
4. Quantification of livelihood:By fixing certain object as a standard reference, lively-hoods of other objects can be measured. Since the livelihood of a concrete object can be expressed relative to livelihoods of other concrete objects, all objects have livelihood from 0 to the most.
The very common activities of objects in nature like ‘moving on application of force’, ‘absorbing heat when heated’, etc. can be considered as near zero peculiar activities. ‘Reading a book’ is an activity with much peculiar value. So, rocks and stones are near zero lively sensible living beings. Plants and Animals are sensible living beings with much livelihood.
If we take the human being as standard reference and take the livelihood of human as 1 L (1 unit),
Livelihood of human = total peculiarity of human actions
= sum of peculiarities of different types of human actions like eating,
memorizing, walking, reading, seeing, listening, thinking, etc..
= 1 L
To measure the livelihood of coconut tree, total peculiarity of actions of coconut tree has
to be compared to the total peculiarity of actions of human.
Livelihood of coconut tree= Total relative peculiarity of actions of coconut tree
= sum of relative peculiarities of actions like flowering, growing,
giving coconuts, etc… with respect to the total peculiarity of
actions of a human.
= 0.5 L (assume).
Appendix:
Definitions:
1. Living Being:
A living being is a concrete object which does peculiar actions.
2. Sensible living beings:
The living beings, whose livelihood can be identified through sense organs directly.
3. super sensual living beings:
The living beings whose livelihood can not be identified through sense organs directly, but may be identifiable indirectly through the identification and understanding of their effects on their environment. -
Ideal Government
29 August 2010 - 10:36 PM
Government
The primary requisite of government of a country is that it should wish and work for the well being of its people effectively. To meet the requirement of looking after people, leaders in the government need not be purely elected by the people. It is enough if the government is good irrespective of how it is formed.
If the leaders are elected by the people directly, it requires that people of the country and constitution should be wise enough and the procedure of election should be good enough to elect good leaders. If people are not wise enough or if the procedure of election does not concentrate on the key requirements, government will definitely fail to be good. Obviously, the present democracies are not good enough. So, the current election procedures are not proper and to some extent people are not wise enough to elect the right people as leaders.
How intelligent, observing and knowledgeable is a key person in the government decides how good is his personality and how efficient and good is he at ruling. The conventional democracy does not check for the above qualities in the political leaders. This is how the conventional democracy is failing to be good.
One of the best ways to select an appropriate person as a leader is explained below.
Selection process:
1. For nominating in elections, the candidates must meet the requirements in intelligence, observation, aptitude, assertiveness, honesty, knowledge, wishing the well being of the country and enough physical health. Nationwide competitive test for the job of a politician has to be conducted for checking the above qualities through examinations.
2. Only people qualified in the above examination will be eligible to nominate in the elections. Election of the leader from nominees by the voters sufficiently ensures that a nominee does not try to exploit the initial exam process (if it is the only process to select a leader) for his selfishness and it makes all the people be listened to by the nominees. It also ensures that a nominee who deceives (if) in the initial exam has to pass through the election process. So, the procedure till here ensures well suited nominees for leadership. But, some of the voters may not intend to elect the best person out of the nominees due to natural unavailability of complete information about the nominees and/or lack of wisdom to identify the right nominees and/or selfishness. Also, the nominees may try to exploit these drawbacks to attract the votes of different classes of people with undue promises or they may inevitably make undue promises.
3. The voting has to be in two tiers to ensure that the right person is selected as the leader. 30% of the weight has to be given to tier 1 of voting process and the remaining 70% weight to the tier 2. In the tier 1 voting, a sufficient number of intellectuals from premier educational institutions, individuals and organizations with intelligent people have to vote because they will be relatively better in identifying and choosing the right people for leadership with less self bias than the common people (Intelligent people have better character and better decision making abilities than common people due to their better observation and thinking. However, the available limited intelligence does not guarantee perfection in character and decision making always. Also, the class of voters in tier 1 may not be sufficiently aware of the common people and their needs. So, keeping the tier 1 voting weight above 30 % means over acceptance of the tier 1 election by making the overall election tier 1 critical. Also, more than 30% weight to tier 1 election puts it to more risk of being hijacked by the politicians). The number of voters in tier 1 has to be large enough not to be threatened or attracted with offers by the political parties; or it should be well guarded. In tier 2, all the general public voters have to vote. Tier 2 voting lets overcoming of glitches in the tier1 voting and makes public be listened to sufficiently by the nominees. The leader has to be finalized by accumulating the results of both the tiers of voting.
Important notes:
· Tests for intelligence and/or knowledge of nominees cannot be ignored. An intelligent politician has better knowledge and decision making skills than a more experienced but less intelligent politician. Intelligence implies character also. Experience with intelligence is a better qualification for a nominee.
· Equal voting status to all people as in the traditional voting means that wise people have to suffer for the equal status given to inferiorly decision making voters. Also, inferiorly decision making voters too suffer because of their own bad decisions in election. Bad decisions matter as good as good decisions. So, equal voting status to people does not support a very good government election. However, division of the weights percentage among the two tiers of election (It may be appropriate that tier 2 public voting can be disregarded); deciding the percentage of the total voters to be in tier 1 election needs sufficient research. The above mentioned weights percents 30 and 70 are according to the author’s limited study only.
· It is people who want government for themselves. People get affected by every government action. It is not appropriate to forcefully give a government to people that they do not want. So, any policy or process related to government should be implemented as per the like of people (majority of the people, where all the people can exist under a same government) irrespective of whether it is good or bad for them. This article is only an informative guide to possible government making. Practically many people may not like the two tier voting process as they may want equal status in voting. The existing single tier public election process may have to be taken for granted. This is not too worse to people than the two tier voting process.
Other requirements for a good government:
1. An expert advisory department can guide or help the government in deciding proper policies or orders.
Before elections, the same department can put the challenges in the country/state/unit and the solutions before voters and election candidates for their reference. This helps both voters and election candidates in decision making.
2. Just good leaders are not enough to have a good administration of the country. The administrative system should be very fine. A fine tuned administrative system needs sufficient research; and since the administration is a very huge system which changes continuously, the research needs continuation through the expert advisory department. New policies/ideas/enforcements can be tested through pilot implementations if needed.
3. Voters are carried by election advertisements and speeches. A good candidate with low spending in election may not be received well by people and a less worth candidate may be able to attract people. Even to just introduce themselves to people some money is needed. So, here money also becomes one of the eligibility criteria to compete in elections, which is not desirable. A candidate should not need to be competitive to spend money to win in elections. The responsibility of introducing a candidate to people with sufficient communication on his policies and qualities lies with the elections conducting authority. No private expenditure should be allowed for candidates’ introduction to people. This makes sure that all the eligible candidates are introduced to voters equally. Any eligible candidate will be able to compete in elections not restricted by his money spending ability. Also, voters have to be educated to not get attracted to attracting advertisements, but analyze facts about candidates.
4. Many voters have tendency to choose their best out of only the candidates who are predicted to get large portion of the votes. But, voting is meant to choose the best person, not the best out of who may win. Voting is less meaningful if voters are not voting to whom they like actually. Awareness has to be created among voters that they have to vote to whom they like irrespective of whether the candidate is going to win or not.
5. Some of the current generation candidates competing in elections think that their policies should be projected to people as completely different from other’s policies to get recognized, and then they try to convince voters that their policies are the best. Candidates have to keep in mind that it is not bad to have same policies and philosophies as the opposition. They may explain to the voters that they can execute the same policies more efficiently than others, if they can really.
visit http://www.theknowledgeone.com for similar information on ideal culture, human psychology, etc needed by all. -
Knowledge Base
08 July 2010 - 03:01 AM
Hi,
I would like to introduce you a website i have created:). KNOWLEDGE
This website contains much needed knowledge for everyone, what is being missed; and some outstanding science theories by me.
Thank you,
Veera -
what is soul-can any one explain theoritically
16 November 2006 - 03:58 AM
Hai all,
Yet the driving force of all living beings is not explained well by scientists.If any one of you know why humans behave in the manner we see (or) what is the algorithm being implemented by human(all creatures) ;please reply.yeh! do not forget to write about soul theoritically.
Friends
kvraghavaiah hasn't added any friends yet.

Help
Join now
Find My Content
Display name history
Comments
kvraghavaiah has no profile comments yet. Why not say hello?