Hypography Science Forums: Mike C - Viewing Profile - Hypography Science Forums

Jump to content

Welcome! You are currently viewing the Hypography Science Forum as a guest. In order to participate in our science discussions, you should register now! Registration is free and you can use your Facebook login if you like.

Mike C's Profile User Rating: -----

Reputation: -1141 Bad
Group:
Members
Active Posts:
750 (0.39 per day)
Most Active In:
Astronomy and Cosmology (343 posts)
Joined:
22-February 07
Profile Views:
1,691
Last Active:
User is offline Jul 13 2008 03:35 PM
Currently:
Offline

My Information

Member Title:
Explaining
Age:
94 years old
Birthday:
December 26, 1917
Gender:
Not Telling Not Telling

Contact Information

E-mail:
Click here to e-mail me

Converted

Biography:
An amateur astronomer and cosmologist. Self educated on those subjects after studying for 20 years
Location:
Mertropolitin Detroit MI US
Interests:
discussing science, relion and politics on the internet
Occupation:
retired. Former toolmaker

Topics I've Started

  1. Lunar Eclipse

    20 February 2008 - 06:55 AM

    An Eclipse is due tonight here in the US and the Americas.

    It will happen at 10:00 PM and end at 10:52 PM.

    It will be seen in Europe too, tommorrow morning.

    For details, see your astronomy magazines.

    Mike C
  2. Theory of Everything

    14 January 2008 - 04:10 AM

    A Theory of Everything

    Albert Einstein was working on a 'theory of everything' and after 30 years of his effort, he failed to develope one.

    So, through a serendipitous discovery, I got involved in this idea when I bought a second hand book at a library entitled 'Introduction to Atomoc and Nuclear Physics' by Henry Semat, 4th Ed.
    On page 588, there was a list of atomic mass numbers (AMN) that included all the isotopes of all the elements up to bismuth that is the heaviest of the elements that is stable. This is a complete list of all the isotopes from one to beyond the last stable element that is bismuth at 209.

    Then I noticed a glaring omission of 2 AMN's. They where 5 and 8. These were the only 2 missing numbers that did not seem to make sense since the 'strong force' (SF) was strictly an attractive force that could not explain why these 2 numbers were missing.
    There was another peculiarity about this SF that was its 'extremely' short range of 10^-15 meters. This is the diameter of a nucleon! The 'weak force' had a still shorter range of 10^-18 meters.

    So I decided to evaluate why the SF did not explain this discrepency.
    Since the SF is supposed to be created in the star fusion process, I thought about why it did not function as it should.
    So evalating the central region (CR) of the stars and their nature of fusion, I came to the conclusion that the real forces involved in the fusion process were the coulomb force and the magnetic component of these EMF's to bind together to create the SF.

    The CR is packed close together to cause the electrons to bypass the protons at very close open orbital passages to cause the protons to spin at very high spin rates. This causes the protons to have very strong magnetic force fields. These protons will align to attract but an electron is needed in between the two protons to complete the bind. This then creates a 'deuteron' nucleus that acts as a powerful 'bar' magnet with an electron sandwiched in between two protons. So two of these deuteron bar magnets will automatically clamp together to create a helium nucleus.

    However, these fusion binds do not create any energies!

    The high velocity electrons bypassing the protons generate strong magnetic pulses because of the high velocity variations that the electrons have, to create the photons in these CRs and then work their way up to the surface of the stars to radiate the light that we see.

    The fusion I described above that involved the fusion of the helium nucleus, explains why a 5th particle is not involved. A 5th particle here would not fit along this combination as it has no where to be attached to.
    Also, 2 helium nuclei will not bind together because their is no electrons attached to the sides of these HN to bind together to form an AMN 8. So 2 HN cannot attach to each other.
    So this fusion process is simply a Quantum effect that involves the EMF's only.

    So a new Grand Unified Theory is the result because of serendipity.
    This solution cannot be solved mathematically because visualization or imaging is required to come to this conclusion.

    See URL below:

    http://hypography.co...ified+Theorypar

    Mike C
  3. One GOD Concept

    14 December 2007 - 07:21 AM

    The bible uses the lion as the role model for their god since he represents the chauvinst mentality of male domination and identifying with the day part of the bibles creation. Since he is a 'killer' god, he then does promote the 'one god concept' by the 1st 3 commandments in the bible.

    Well, I have come up with a NEW one god concept.
    This happens to be only a 'body part' that applies to only our 'material' creations that we revere above everything else.

    So what is this god? It is our HANDS that is the greatest tool in our lives.
    Without these HANDS, we would not have had the evolution of weapons development that made us the creators of not only the weapon systems but all this material goods that made our lives comfortable to enjoy our lives.

    Brains, as I have said on other threads, do NOT create any 'real tangible weath'.
    The only source for this material wealth is our HANDS, So then I think it is appropriate to say that this ONE tool can be designated as our GOD.

    Mike C
  4. Expansion of Light Waves

    09 November 2007 - 06:16 AM

    EVIDENCE FOR THE EXPANSION OF THE LIGHT WAVES

    The ‘expansion of the light waves has real evidence for its support. Examples:

    The magnetic field patterns where the central portion is expanded by an ‘intrinsic’ force between the magnetic poles and field lines.
    This is also true of the electric fields between the opposite charges by similar real field charged particles (SRFCP) through mutual repulsion since they are similarely charged The electric motor makes use of these intrinsic forces within the EM fields to generate the power for its use.

    The photons are primarily a compressed congregate of these SRFCP that result from the magnetic pulses of radiation during the electron transitions
    in the hydrogen atoms. These magnetic pulses are directional and at maximum magnitude when the observer is perpendicular to the electrons orbital transitional movements and in line with the electrons orbital plane of movement.
    The electric fields surrounding the electrons are the carriers that transmit the photons.
    The photon energy (momentum) uses this field for its transmission by the mutual repulsion between these field particles.

    In a tranquil state, they disperse themselves equally around the electron and throughout the surrounding area and the spaces widen as the distances of the field increase from the electron.

    The photon congregate pushes against the particles in front to transmit their momentum through this field as a line of dominos transfer their falls through the aligned dominos.
    In other words, they just 'wobble' to transmit their momentum.
    Naturally, this photon energy is transmitted at the velocity of light.

    The Arp redshift anomalies show that these RS’s are temperature related and therefore intrinsic to the light being emitted by these objects and their radiating temperatures.
    Quasars radiate at much higher temperatures than the nearby galaxies.
    The intrinsic forces in these higher energy photons cause a greater expansion per unit distance. That is why they have higher redshifts at the same distance than the adjacent galaxies.

    It takes billions of years for these photons to increase their wavelengths. My estimate is a length of about 4 - 5 billion light years for a photon to increase by one wavelength.

    The BB space expansion concept cannot expand the light pulses because they are not the transmitters of these pulses.
    The Michelson - Morley interferometer experiment has refuted the idea of a spatial ether influencing the photon expansions.
    So the cosmological redshift cannot be a product of the space expansion.

    Mike C
  5. Stability of the Hydrogen Atom

    02 November 2007 - 03:57 AM

    Stability of the Hydrogen Atom (HA):

    According to classical physics, the hydrogen atom is composed of an
    electron orbiting a proton and the assumption here is that the electron
    would eventually plunge into the proton because it would lose its energy.

    This is another example of faulty math that is used to refute Newtonian mathematics.

    The reason why this math is erroneous is because the Magnetic forces are not considered.

    So, I would like to explain why that does not happen.

    The electrons revolution around the proton causes the proton to spin
    in the same direction as the motion of the electron because of the ‘coulomb’ force’s attraction between the two particles. The protons spin is synchronous in relation to the electrons motion.
    The closer the electron approaches to the proton, the proton spin increases as a result of the electrons increased velocity.

    These motions of the two particles create magnetic fields that create an intrinsic force that pushes against the two fields to give the electron a boost to its orbital momentum.
    So the presence of this force and the electrons momentum keep the electron in this state that is the ‘ground’ state of the HA indefinitely. So the only state where the HA will collapse is in the central regions of the stars where these atoms are fused to form ‘deuterons’ that are the precursors to forming the helium nuclei.

    If the magnetic field interactions were taken into account, this formula would be complete and it would not fail. As long as there is no excitation, the hydrogen atom will remain in its ground state indefinitely.

    This magnetic interaction can be easily proven with the 'right hand rule' representing the electrons MF orientation relative to the direction of motion around the proton and the 'left hand rule' that is applicable to the proton spin MF relative to the direction of its spin that is in the same direction as the electrons motion..

    Just clench your fists in both hands and place them close to your body with the thumbs pointing outward that represent the particles direction of movements . The protons 'spin' side adjacent to the electron is moving in the same direction synchronously with the electrons movement.
    Notice that your fingers are pointing upward and outward. Your fingers represent the orientation of the magnetic field lines. Both fields are moving 'upward' and 'outward'. This 'upward' movement in the same direction 'creates' a REPULSION within these fields that gives the electrons momentum an additional boost to resist the coulomb attraction.

    While in the ground state, the hydrogen atom will radiate a one
    angstrom (approximately) sign wave continuum. All other hydrogen atoms
    in the same ground state will do likewise. Therefore, there will be no
    loss or absorption of energy between them.

    Photons that are spent by being absorbed by plants or are spent by their expansion to infinite widths are not spent energy to cause the HA to collapse because the electrons have to absorb a photon to reradiate a photon. So here, we also have no loss of energy;

    Mike C

Friends

Mike C hasn't added any friends yet.

Comments

Mike C has no profile comments yet. Why not say hello?


View our Science Quizzes | Science links. About the Hypography Science Forums

Friends

We recommend these stellar sites:

PC Help Forum

ATL - Atlanta Computer Repair

Sponsors

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

When we launched in May 2000, we wanted to create a site to share science-related content of all kinds on the web. As time passed, our site turned into a pure science forum with lots of cool people.

So we kept the name Hypography and the cool science forum community - and aim to be a friendly place for discussion of science topics of all kinds.