Jay-qu's Profile
Reputation: 188741
Excellent
- Group:
- Moderators
- Active Posts:
- 6,360 (2.4 per day)
- Most Active In:
- Watercooler (885 posts)
- Joined:
- 26-February 05
- Profile Views:
- 7,257
- Last Active:
Today, 10:36 AM- Currently:
- Offline
My Information
- Member Title:
- Ancora Imparo
- Age:
- 24 years old
- Birthday:
- January 27, 1988
- Gender:
-
Not Telling
Contact Information
- E-mail:
- Click here to e-mail me
- Website URL:
-
http://www.physicsguides.com
Converted
- Biography:
- In the process of becoming an Astro-physicist
- Location:
- Australia
- Interests:
- astronomy, basketball, bodyboarding, skiing
- Occupation:
- student
Posts I've Made
-
In Topic: Problems With Dark Matter
23 May 2012 - 01:26 AM
PetTastic, on 26 April 2012 - 07:58 AM, said:Dark matter bashing is getting very popular.
Milky ways' companions don't fit dark matter models(The Royal Astronomical Society)
No dark matter within 13,000 lightyears
Just yesterday a new result was published showing that study to be incorrect. They made an incorrect assumption about how stars move within our galaxy, see here for the details: http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4033
J -
In Topic: What Travels Faster Than What?
19 October 2011 - 10:52 PM
I don't think Elburg's point is relevant. The distance measurements are made with the GPS and transformed into the European Terrestrial Reference System (set in 2000 (it changes due to continental drift)), this is routine GPS work requiring special and general relativity. The timing measurements are checked with synchronised Caesium atomic clocks at each lab.
I like your idea Qfwfq, but how do you resolve it with supernova neutrino observations? -
In Topic: What Travels Faster Than What?
30 September 2011 - 11:45 PM
While this is a potentially exciting result, I am highly sceptical. Fitting the neutrino beam "profile", a mere 16,000 counts over the life of the experiment, to the proton beam is tricky to say the least. Before systematic effects are subtracted there is discrepancy of 1050ns, they account for -990ns, leaving the neutrinos 60ns faster than light over the ~720km. Have a look at figure 11/12 and ask yourself how much difference it makes to the fit if you shift the red line by just 50ns (one division/bin in fig 12) to the right. This would bring the result within error of c. And you don't have to worry about upsetting the fit for the trailing edge, no errors for the possible change in beam profile have been included.
A further sobering note worth pointing out is that 30 physicists (of the 200) in the collaboration asked to have their names removed from this result. -
In Topic: Hi There, I'm New, And I've Brought Cookies....
15 May 2011 - 04:57 AM
Welcome aboard
do not be shy to ask anything, we will be gentle.
-
In Topic: Standard Model
11 May 2011 - 06:05 AM
This isn't a very complete poll.. we know the Standard Model does not explain everything, but it does do a tremendous job of describing physics within its domain of validity. The current results collected by the LHC have not done much more than the Tevatron has already, but by the end of the year the LHC will have charted some new territory.
The 'Standard' Standard Model has a simple form of the Higgs, but it is likely that the Higgs mechanism will be effected by or be part of physics beyond the Standard Model. Unfortunately our current experiments don't give us much to go by, but hopefully in the next 10 years the LHC will give us something new - and even better, give us something completely unexpected.

Help
Join now
Find My Content
Display name history














Comments
Turtle
29 Mar 2012 - 13:22Turtle
29 Mar 2012 - 13:22Turtle
28 Mar 2012 - 21:20Turtle
28 Mar 2012 - 21:20Turtle
14 Sep 2011 - 12:52Turtle
14 Sep 2011 - 12:45Turtle
14 Sep 2011 - 12:37the non-figurate (non-polygonal) numbers thread is still going strong. lot's of new propositions and a few proofs & some exciting new maps. :) you graduating soon? over...
Turtle
14 Sep 2011 - 12:31Turtle
27 Jan 2011 - 20:51Turtle
27 Jan 2011 - 09:50Tormod
17 Aug 2010 - 22:45Tormod
17 Aug 2010 - 22:38Tormod
17 Aug 2010 - 22:32Turtle
27 Jan 2010 - 04:04Chacmool
27 Jan 2010 - 03:05