jerrygg38

In my latest book "The Gravitational Wave and the Dot-Wave theory" particles constantly radiate both mass and charge which forms gravitational waves and electromagnetic waves. When you accelerate a mass, some of the momentum increases the mass in the form of spherical waves and some increases its velocity which is a linear component. We then get a formula for increasing mass with velocity and increasing inertia with velocity. The mass increase tends to level off as the additional energy radiates away. the formula for gravitational mass is Mg = Mo /(1-(v/C)2)0.5 This is Einstein's formula which is correct for the gravitational mass The inertial mass is more the formula is Mi = Mo/(1-(v/C)2) This would be the total equivalent mass/energy of the moving object. As we go back in time toward the big bang, the charges of the proton and electron were much larger. The question is whether when we add energy to an electron or proton, does only the photonic (bipolar energy) increase and the mass/inertial increases or does the photonic energy split and causes the particle's charge to increase as well? Thus do we go back in time to a little after the big bang when the charge Q was much larger? In any event Einjsteins special relativity is a good approximation to the mass increase because it is the root means square of the Doippler Equations. Your thoughts may be basically true,.

I guess I have been basically thrown out of this forum Anyone interested in the Dot-Wave theory can discuss it at my space page I will start a science group in about a week MySpace.com - Gerald - 69 - Male - Cary, North Carolina - www.myspace.com/kmm8qq

I guess I have been thrown out of this forum Anyone interested in the Dot-Wave theory can discuss it on my blog at MySpace.com - Gerald - 69 - Male - Cary, North Carolina - www.myspace.com/kmm8qq I will start a group there in about a week on the theory.

When the billion big bangs occur, there is a distribution of energy around the universe. The process involves random chance. Therefore some galaxies will be much larger than others, some will have much more mass, some will be independent, others will be dependent. Many will be similar to ours. there is no control over the process. As far as the conservation laws are concerned, we produce laws based upon what we observe and measure. The universe at the present time is an old universe in which most of the action occurred long ago. At the big bang, the forming protons and electrons had huge masses but were equal in size. Therefore at least half of the electrons mass/energy radiated away in the last 15 billion years. This would account for much of the dark matter which really is my dot-waves in space. Space is full of dot waves and we live in a space filled with dots similar to the general gas laws. Except the rules are different because the dots are either stationary (mass dots) or moving at light speed C (photonic dots). There is no difference between these dots. It only depends upon which dimensions they exist in. Thus the conservation of mass/energy is true but this refers to the total mass.energy of the universe including all the dark mass/energy. Most likely at the big bang, even more mass/energy radiated away. Some people believe that there is 4 times as much dark matter as our matter. That seems okay to me. As far as the conservation of momentum, that is correct when all the momentums are considered. Linear momentum can convert into orbital mommentum at the dot wave level. For example an electron beam moving upon a target experiences continuous quantized motion. Each dot stops every split second and then restarts at light speed. When it stops its linear momentum changes into orbital momentum. Then it goes again and its orbital momentum changes back into linear momentum. However these is no guarantee which direction it will be . Thus the magnitude of the momentum is concerved on the dot level but its angle is not. this is the reason for the Heisenberg Uncertaintly principle. Quantum mechanics makes the error of believing in a multi-dimensional universe which operates on the large scale. They are true at the small scale. It is possible for an electron to have synchronized mass/energy conversions such that all the dots are photonic dots at the same time. Then the electron could completely dematerialize and rematerialize on the moon a few second later. However the probability of such an occurrenece is basically zero. On the small scale, the electron produces a wide spot on a screen. The important thing is that the concerservation of momentum is really Linear Momentum plus orbital momentum = Constant When you take large objects, the probability is such that most of the time the object will move in a straight line. Since there are 2.28198E41 mass/photonic dots in a proton, most of the time, most of the dots will reemerge in a straight line. In addition as the object moves only some dots change from mass dots to photonic dots every split second at a time. Therefore an object moving in straight line motion tends to continue moving in a straight line. Thus for all practical purposes on a large scale Linear Momentum= Constant Orbital momentum = constant It is unfortunate that we produce laws which are only partially true and which degrade the thinking of man. I reject all laws until I can fully understand them. Thus for 27 years I have not let myself be limited by any laws such as light speed being constant or that only our light speed is available within our space time. In general the light speed depends upon the density of dots in space. The more dots per cubic meter, the lower the light speed. If we do not think outside the box of our taught limitations, how can we move forward?

I am adding this section to help the reader understand what I studied over the years. I started with the numerical relationships such as 4 pi Q T=1 There are many other relationships but what do they mean. It took many years just to produce some good equations. It took 15 years to get a good equation for gravity. You ask for references. My only books are my college physics book from 1966. I name them in my manuscript. These included Einsteins special relativity although I read it directly from him in 1981-3 when I studied his work. The only Modern book of any significiance is Brian Greens Elegant Universe which I guess everyone is familiar with and which I do not understand much. The only important thing is his discussion of the smallest string which is of the same order as my dot size. Also he defines multi-dimensions at this small size which made me look at my dots under a micro-scope. Anyway here is my 4 pi Q T = 1 analysis. SECTION 9-5 THE OUTER RADIUS OF THE GALAXY The outer radius of the galaxy is a constant of the universe. The universe we live in at the present time appears to be quite stable. Therefore the outer radius of the electro-magnetic fields has reached a limit. The protons and electrons are still expanding. Gravity still exists. The mass of the universe is still disintegrating. The electron has been deprived of a great deal of mass. It has maintained its charge Q but the structure of the electron is in jeopardy. Thus within a few billion more years, the electron will self-destruct. The self-destruction of the electron will result in a little bang. This is a condition, which signals the final end of the universe. It is a little bang because the energy levels are very low as compared to the original big bang. The little bang hastens the outer flow of energy toward the radius of the galaxy. It will then take billions of more years for this energy to reach the outer radius. When this happens, a time will be reached when the electromagnetic energy density at the outer radius of the galaxy will reach a critical point. Then the electromagnetic field will collapse. We now need to know the radius of the outer field of the galaxy. This radius does not change. Just as the speed of light is a basic constant, the radius of the galaxy’s outer field is a constant. After the big bang, the photonic waves moved outward from the center at the speed of light. Due to the hysteresis loop of the universe, a degree of electro-magnetic energy always remains at the outer radius of the universe. Returning to my numerical analysis of the universe in 1981, the following equations always appeared as self-evident to me> 4 pi Q Tg = 1 (9-10) Using the radians per second solution for the charge Q we have: 4 pi (Radians per second) (Sec) = 1 (9-11) 4 pi Radians = 1 (9-12) Equation 9-12 states that 4-pi radians equal unity. For single plane two dimensional rotations, 2 pi radians equals: 2 pi radians = 360 degrees = 1 turn (9-13) The corresponding three dimensional relationship is: 4 pi Radian = 1 turn (9-14) Since the charge of the electron is a constant value of 1.60218E-19, we can calculate the time to reach the outer sphere of the galaxy or universe. Tg = Tu = 4.96682E17 seconds (9-15) The Radius to the outer field of the galaxy is: Rg = C Tg = 1.48901E26 meters (9-16) We calculated the time of the galaxy from the Hydrogen atom since big bang to be: Tg= 5.02227E17 (9-17) Tg = 15.9145 billion years (9-18) The radius of the galaxy was calculated from the Hydrogen atom to be: Rg = 1.50564E26meters (9-19) From equations 9-15 and 9-17 we find that the electromagnetic field from the big bang has already reached the outer radius of the galaxy. The difference in times is: Delta time = 5.547E15 seconds (9-19) Delta time = 175.77 million years (9-20) We see that 176 million years ago, the electromagnetic field, from the big bang reached full expansion. This is a difference of: Percentage of Delta time = 1.1 Percent (9-21) The calculations in this book used the Hydrogen atom expansion velocity to calculate the time of the universe and the mass of the dot. There is a 1.1 percent difference between those calculations and the time found from the charge Q. This would change the number of dots per neutron by 1.1 percent and the charge per dot by the same amount. For this study, the Hydrogen atom numbers have been used. It is just noted that there are two methods of determining the mass of the dot. This is left for future study.

Here is my latest letter to the Professors: In this letter is the scientific data that I work with. The measurements of the Hydrogen atom and the Neutron enable the dot-theory calculations. Once you understand what is happening in the hydrogen atom and the neutron then the red shift becomes clear. Thus here is my data: The Dot-Wave theory has been completely reformulated. Many people had difficulty understanding my presentation. In addition as soon as I finished it, new thoughts came to mind. My recent study of string theory enabled me to look inside my dots. Instead of charge and mass being equal to each other, they are transforms of each other. The dots now have more complex characteristics. Qd + (-Qd) ===== Md The dots exist at a radius Rd of 2.51941E-29meters in the here and now. They existed at 1.59407E-37meters at the time of big bang. The above transformation equations specifies that a plus dot charge Qd of 1.13144E-57 coulombs and a negative dot charge (-Qd) of 1.13144E-57 coulombs combine at Rd and form a mass Md of 7.33982E-69 kilograms in the here and now. Md=9.94289E-61 kg at big bang. The bipolar- mass dot continually changes from a mass dot when stationary to a photonic dot as it moves. Thus each dot exhibits a particle wave characteristic. The singular plus dot is a charge dot when stationary. When it moves at light speed C, it become a singular magnetic dot. The characteristics depend upon which dimensions the dots are working at. The characteristics are as follows. Dot……………Velocity………Mass……………Charge…………….Fields Plusdot……………0………………0………………..+Qd……………DC field Negative…………0………………0…………………-Qd…………….DC field Bipolar……………0………………Md..………………0……………..Grav field Plusdot……………C………………0…………………+Qd…………..electro-photonic Minus…………….C………………0…………………-Qd……………electro-photonic Bipolar……………C………………0………………….0………………grav. & photonic When we apply this theory to the hydrogen atoms we find that the Einsteinian energy of the electron at C/137.036 in the Bohr orbit is 13.606 electron volts. This energy is produced by the loss of charge of both the electron and proton of 3.73892E-24Coulombs. Thus the charge of both the electron and proton in the lowest Bohr orbit is 1.60218E-19 – 3.73892E-24 = 1.60214E-19coulombs. Therefore the electron is prevented from moving into the proton due to the loss of charge. When a neutrino is added to the hydrogen atom, the Einsteinian mass/energy of the electron increases to 1.29300MEV as it reaches a velocity of 0.91859333C. This increase comes from the neutrino and the electric field between proton and electron. A transformation of the charge dots of the proton and electron into bipolar mass dots occurs. This leaves the neutron electrically neutral charge wise. The electric field provides KQ/R = 1.09122MEV. Therefore the energy of the neutrino is: E (neutrino) = 1.29300- 1.09122MEV = 0.20178MEV. Thus most of the mass increase in the process came from the electrical field. For 27 years, since age 42, I worked on the Dot-Wave theory. My book “Doppler Space Time” was self published in 2000. Just three months ago I created the Dot-Wave Unified Field theory. Yet in just the last few weeks the theory changed dramatically.

Thanks for the information. My posts are part of my Unified Field theory. I do not have any backup because what I write is my singular theory. Einstein published his Special Relativity theory without proofs. Proofs came later. A theory does not require proofs or backup. I am not discussing other peoples theory but my own. There may be parts of my theory which are incorrect and must be revised. As far as the redshift is concerned as my theory sees it, it is due to (1)the expansion of the dot-waves . This will expand the rulers. Is that what face means? (2) According to my theory, the Redshift is also due to the slowing of light when the photonic field encounters stars and galaxies. Finally the third component of the redshift is due to the conversion of grav-photonic energy into electro-photonic energy as the light sphere reaches a maximum radius of 15.9 billion light years as per my Dot-Wave theory calculations. I have no proof or references to this theory. That is why I post in the New Theories sections for discussions. I also send my theory to some College professors who provide me with some useful feedback. I just emailed over 120 schools with my revised theory. It is not easy to get many responses but I do get some. However I just had to rewrite my work to make it more understandable.

Moderation note: this thread was moved from the Alternative Theories forum because the ideas it presents, while interesting, neither make predictions that can be scientifically tested, and thus constitute a scientific theory, nor are supported by links or references. THE RED SHIFT Theory There are two possible explanations for the red shift. The most common theory is that the far stars are moving away from us near the speed of light. However this conflicts with Einstein’s laws of moving objects. The far stars would have to have near infinite kinetic energy to move near the speed of light. The second possibility is that the light from the far stars loses energy per unit distance of travel. This makes more sense according to the dot-wave theory because the dot-wave energy decreases with time. To make matters worse for the fast moving galaxy theory is the constraints placed upon our light speed C universe by the multi-lightspeed universe. Since space is a spectrum of multi-lightspeed energies, the only thing, which varies, are the dots and the dot-waves. Therefore expanding galaxies at the speed of light cannot fit into a multi-lightspeed universe. The cosmology dot-wave theory is an extension of the dot-wave theory. It specifies that the distance between the center of galaxies does not change. Thus the black holes at the center of our major galaxies were formed during the big bang and have remained basically stationary ever since. This does not say that every black hole is stationary. Some smaller black holes may rotate around other black holes. However all black holes will tend to be within a relatively small distance from the inner sphere of our universe which is at 15.9145 Billion light years from the common center. In order to understand the red shift; let us perform a simple experiment, which will help to explain the red shift. Take a small pebble and throw it in a quiet lake. This represents the big bang impulse function. Notice that when the rock hits the water, there is a high frequency high amplitude wave at the point of origin or big bang. Notice that as the wave stretches out that the amplitude of the wave and the frequency of the wave decreases. Upon the lake the wave will dissipate. A point is reached where the wave will not be visible. There is friction within the water and thus the wave energy is used up. This simple experiment shows us what is happening to the photonic waves from the far stars. As the light wave stretches out we find that energy is used up in the stretching of the energy field. Thus the photonic field acts very much like the water wave. By the time the light wave from the far stars reaches us, the energy of the wave is basically zero. All the energy has been used up and the wave will end in space at a distance Rg from each galaxy. As all the waves form a sphere as shown on the cover page, we get a perfect sphere at 31.8 billion light years from the common center of the universe. At the 31.8 billion light year distance we meet up with the light speed 2 inner sphere with light speed 2 galaxies. Thus our wave ends at the junction of the next higher light speed universe. Likewise our inner sphere at 15.9 light years from the center contains our galaxies and is the surface where the light speed C/2 universe ends. The dot-waves have expanded since the big bang. The photonic and gravitational fields have expanded as well. The galaxies have expanded however they have only expanded a small distance as compared to the photonic, gravitational, and electromagnetic fields. The photonic waves tend to have collisions with the dots-waves of space. The waves continually hit the large amounts of free space dot-waves, which exist with random motion. The collisions are similar to the general gas laws except they occur at light speed. This damages the photonic waves. Thus the resistance of space decreases the energy of the photonic waves. As the photonic wave flows outward over long distances, the collisions break up the wave. The wave loses energy per unit time or distance. Thus the universe tends to eat up the energy. The lost energy remains within space. Thus vast areas of space have huge amounts of dot-wave energy in them. However the dot-waves are uniformly distributed and cannot be seen or measured. The red shift can be defined as: f= fo [ 1 – (Rs/Rg )...............................(5-2) Equation 5-2 defines the redshift. It states that the frequency of the light wave from the emitting stars equals the original frequency fo (after big bang stability) times 1 minus the ratio of the distance from the far stars Rs divided by the radius of the galaxy Rg. At the far stars, the light is white like our stars. As the light wave moves toward us, it gets redder and redder. It is true that the far galaxies are expanding. This means that their ruler has increased over time. However our ruler has increased as well. Thus the expansion of the dot-waves over time tracks the expansion of the protons and electrons over time. Therefore the expansion is common mode and cannot readily be measured. The photonic waves coming from the far stars are independent photons photonic waves. Within our Galaxy we have dependent photonic waves. We are all traveling at the same galaxy speed. We are all part of our galaxy’s inertial system. All galaxies tend to be independent systems. Therefore we must look at the entire light wave from a galaxy as coming from a different inertial system. Our measurements of the light waves from far galaxies come from our inertial system. We read a light wave, which has been weakened as it stretched outward at the speed of light. Therefore the light wave that we measure is no different than the water wave we saw by throwing a pebble into a quiet lake. The photons from our sun are part of the same inertial system as our galaxy. We produce gravitational and photonic waves all over the universe. These waves will reach a maximum radius and die out completely. We produce describing functions to explain how our light works. This is all well and good for this galaxy. Light waves from a far galaxy flows across many other galaxies before reaching us. Thus independent photonic and gravitational fields interact with each other. Energy is transferred between these fields. The net result is the destruction of the fields into chaos over time. Another factor for the redshift is the slowing of the light as it passes stars. The high density of space dots surrounding stars cause the photons to slow due to increased permitivity and permeability constants. As the light nears a sun, the light speed drops. When this happens, the photon takes on the property of mass as per the following formula: Mg = Mo [ 1- (V/C)^2 ]^1/2 ....................................(5-3) Equation 5-3 is a describing function equation of the overall photon. The photon is composed of the bipolar dots. These dots have the capability of being mass dots or photonic dots. When the photon travels at light speed, the multi-dimensional bipolar dot stays in the photonic dimensions. Thus it is basically almost 99.9 percent photon. The bipolar dots photonic dots change into bipolar mass dots some of the time as soon as the photon speed drops. The net result is that the photon will oscillate between pure photon and partial mass. This will cause some bipolar dot-waves to split into electro-photonic waves and electro-dots. This prevents the photon from moving too far off course. In the process, the photon turns red. Therefore there are two main parts of the redshift. The collision with space dots acts like friction and wears out the photonic wave. This causes the wave to turn into stationary bipolar dots, stationary electro-dots, and electro-photon dot-waves. The final process involves the total destruction of the grav-photonic field into the electromagnetic field. As soon as the remains of the photonic wave reaches near the radius of the galaxy, the last mechanical energy turns into electrical energy. This self limits the galaxy field. This process protects and conserves the galaxy energy.

Good thoughts. As you look at the value of special relativity, you see Einstein related the world of space and time to what we ordinary think. Everything he quotes is respect to our own bodies. Thus we view the world from our reference plane. SR is wrong because the Michelson/Morely experiment was invalid. The gravitational field of the Earth causes the light speed in all directions to adjust to light speed Earth Ce. Thus the instrument could not measure anything other than equal light speed in all directions. The brilliant mind of Einstein related to world to his mind. You get the same equations from the Doppler. M(forward) = Mo (C/(C-V) M(rear) = Mo (C/(C+V) M(RMS) = Mo / [1-(V/C)^2]^0.5 thus Einstein is Root mean square Doppler. His answers are beautiful because they are RMS Doppler. the distance formulas for RMS Doppler are L(RMS) = Lo [(1-(v/c)^2]^0.5 T=To [1-(V/C)^2]^0.5 The Michelson/Morley experiment is invalid because the gravitational field of the Earth reduced the speed of the photons to our light speed as they traveled from the sun to us. Now why do we think of an infinite light speed reference plane and instantaneous interactions? Because we exist in a multi-light speed universe. Althought Einsteins reference plane ideas are excellent, he did not understand that light speed goes from 0 to infinity in the total universe. Another basic problem with Einstein was that he did not realize that his photons travel quantized distances. Thus my dots exist at 0 velocity, then they jump to light speed C. Then they stop and become mass dots. Then they jump to light speed C. Thus the dots within the photons continually materialize and dematerialize. The electron for example has huge amounts of dots and they all jump from spot to spot as the electron moves. If all the dots move simultaneously the electron completely dematerializes. The probability is low of course but the electron beam will produce a distribution of spots. The important thing is that once we only think from our own vantage point, we neglect to see the entire universe. Your points are excellent from the position of an ordinary person who looks at the universe from inside himself. It is invalid from the point of view of a person who sees himself within the universe from outside the universe. That is the way I think. I always look at myself from outside myself. The world is different when you look at yourself from afar.

In my manuscript I speak of spin in terms only. This is a very difficult subject because I have so many different types of spins and I do not know how to calculate them. The electric dot-waves spin, the bipolar dot waves spin, the electron itself spins with its dot-waves, the body of the electron can spin at a different angle from the spin of the bipolar dot waves, the housing of the dot waves can spin at a different angle from the dot-waves themselves. Thus I have so many spins and it would take me 20 years to figure them out. All I can do is leave the theory for others to figure out. Yes the Positron is different than just a reversal of the electron/proton combination. The spins are most likely opposite but I do not understand enough about the dot-wave spins. After all my dot-waves are only 3 months old. I was happy with just dots until I looked at Brian Greene book. Then I was forced to look inside my dots. As a single person I cannot rewrite all the equations of physics which developed over 100 years. All I can do is present the salient parts of the dot-wave theory for others to study and work on. My dot-waves are quite flexible. Since a dot wave changes from particle to wave constantly, everything is a particle wave. In effect parts of an electron materialize and dematerialize constantly. Thus Heisenbergy uncertainty principle is clear with the dot-wave theory. So is the Double slit experiment. Here are the dot-characteristisc Dot........Velocity........Mass.........Charge........Fields Plus........0..................0.............+Qd...........DC fields Minus.......0................0..............-Qd............DC fields Bipolar......0................Md.............0...............Grav. field plus..........C...............0................+Qd...........Magnetic minus........C..............0................-Qd.............Magnetic Bipolar.......C.............0..................0..............Grav &Photonic Notice that my 2 dots have have six different properties. this is because within the radius of the dot, they all operate in different dimensions. I only realized this 3 weeks ago. For 27 years I thought I could build a universe with only 2 electrical dots. Then I started to rewrite my dot theory based upon the conversion of mass to charge rather than mass to charge times velocity C. Suddenly the same equations started to make sense. So I failed to produce a viable theory in 27 years. I am glad I am not on morphine yet. My last upper biting tooth just broke yesterday. Now I need dentures. I guess I will be in the old age home soon with my tongue hanging out. I had good equations but for 27 years I did not understand the multi-dimensional dots. Thank God for the String mathematicians. the pictures in the book look funny. My dots are simplier. However without them I would not have the dot-charts. Anyway happy Thanksgiving. Until my dentures arrive, I am left to chop meat and rice.

I just finished the manuscript and will send it to Library of Congress tomorrow. Now I have time to answer your questions.(If you want a copy I would be happy to send it to you. No money necessary. You ask how you keep the particles apart. The answer is I don't. The particles exist at 2.15941E-29 meters. A plus dot has a charge of 1.31144E-57 coulombs. When stationary it is a charge. A split second later it moves at light speed C and is a point magnetic source. A split second later it is a charge again. thus the plus dot continually changes from a point charge to a point magnetic source. The minus dot does the same thing for the negative. These operate at different dimensions as per String theory type concepts. When a plus charge and minus charge unite, they form a mass bipolar dot when stationary and a grav-photonic dot when moving at C. Again this change is continuous. The moving electron has bipolar dots continually changing as it moves. Dots do not move continuously. They stop. They jump at light speed, then stop again. Thus the dots are particle-waves. As far as the electron moving around the proton is concerned the basic equation of the universe is Qd + (-Qd) <-------------> Md Md = 7.33982E-69Kg. The above equation is a transformation equation. I used to believe it was an equals equations. However after thinking about string theory for the last few weeks, I completely changed my theory. Sadly after 27 years, my work changed three months ago. Now after the last few weeks things are making more sense to me. Although I am near 70 years, I have a mind which keeps generating alternate theories. The worst thought I had was that in the near future I would find myself on morphine during my last few days. At that time, I would realize the errors in my work and I could do nothing about it. Well I am happy to say that although my work of 27 years has been destroyed by myself, I am not on morphine yet. The worst thing was that my Doppler Space Time was destroyed two days ago. It isn't that my equations are destroyed. My explanations suck. I have my dual brain to contend with. the concept portion cannot speak but comes up with great ideas. My audio/visual portion can speak and see but cannot often understand what the other half of my brain understands. So I know the answers but cannot understand them. On tests I used to write the answers first and then try to work them out. I was a terrible logic designer. I wrote out the designs and then checked them. I made little corrections and they worked well. But the regular designers could not understand how I could do that and I could not understand how they could do their work. The big problem was when I had to explain to the customers how my designs worked. So Technical writers fudged some answers and everyone was happy. I just do things backwards. Therefore to solve the universe I write down answers and then see how they work out. Then I try to explain them. This is especially hard when you really do not understand how they work and why. So we look at the problem with the electron in the Bohr orbit. At the Bohr radius, the equations are: F= K WQ Q /R^2 = Ma V^2 / R where Ma = Mo / (1-(V/C)^2) ^0.5 The first equation is the standard balance of forces between two charges and the centrifugal force. The second equation is the Einsteinian relationship. Notice most physics books of long ago did not look at the Einsteinian term. When we calculate the mass increase at c/137.036 we find it to be 13.606EV. This is exactly the same as the ionization energy. Unless you were taught differently, this has been overlooked. At least in my 1966 course. (I went 10 years at night). Look what happens when the electron tries to reach the proton, the Einsteinian term becomes huge. Thus the electron cannot achieve the proton radius without the neutrino. The other problem is the electrical energy to mass conversion formula. As the electron nears the proton, it loses charge. Since 1 kilograms <-----------> 3.08302E11 coulombs, 1 electron volts transforms into 5.49598E-25 coulombs Therefore Delta Charge = 3.73892E-24 coulombs and Q = 1.60218E-19 -3.7892E-24 = 1.60214E-19 Coulombs This is only 23.34 PPM of charge change. The loss of charge and the increase of Einsteinian mass/energy prevents the electron from flowing into the proton.

You ask a lot of good questions. I have just finished rewriting the theory for the third time. I do not answer all the questions in my manuscript. I am a retired Electrical Engineer and only certain things interested me such as the basic structure of the universe, the size and shape of the universe, the double slit experiment explanations, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, the U-Meson shower, the K-Mesons and 2182Me Lamba, the binding energy of the proton, the red shift, the Michelson Morley experiment, the proton and electron right after big bang, the structure of space so that positive and negative particles attract.ETc. Slowly I will post these things. If you like a copy of the manuscript I will mail it to your free if you want or you can pay for postage and printing at $8. I only send the paper copy. (most people want to pay the printing and postage but I don't care since I have sent so many copies of my work free over the years. ( I am independently poor on social security) Email at jerrygg38@nc.rr.com if desired. Anyway to me antimatter is simple the electron being in the center and the proton being on the outside with the mass reversed. Thus my dots can produce either. In the lab energy turns into positrons and electrons. I am not concerned about those details since my dots do so much especially since I brought them into multi-dimensional dots similar to string theory> The radius of my dots is 2.15941E-29 meters now but was 1.59407E-37 meters at the time of big bang. I will try to answer your questions soon. I guess the bests way is for me to print it out and answer off line. I am not really that good on the internet. So I don't know how to break apart a long post such as yours.

To Watcher thanks for the info. I have been rewriting my theory the last two weeks to make it clearer. In the process I discovered many more things about the my dots. The minute I looked at Brians Greene , The Elegant Universe, I began to calculate the size of my dots. It turns out that it is in the ballpark of string theory. Then I started to realize that since the mathematicians already discovered multi-dimensional space time at that tiny size, I started to apply my dot-wave theory to that concept. The results have been fantastic. For 27 years I never looked inside my dots. Now I am amazed by what I see. Now I can explain why a plus charge is pushed to a minus charge. Once I write something down, then I attack it. I am my own devils advocate. Sometimes it takes a year for me to attack my work. It is only a few weeks that I wrote the dot-wave theory. And already I have attacked it twice. Yet each time I attack it, it gets better. My equations do not change. But my explanations change greatly. then I begin to understand it. Anyway it is nice that someone else believes we can produce the entire universe from two things. But I have been saying that for years. Once we go to multi-dimensional space time, these two things develop different characteristis depending upon which dimension they are in. Thus the plus dot become a plus magnetic dot which moves at C. The minus dot become the negative magnetic dot moving at C. They keep changing. The plus and minus dot operate in different dimensions and become a mass dot. the mass dot changes dimensions and become a photon dot. the most important equation is +Qd +(-Qd) <--------> Md This is the top equation. A plus dot plus a minus dot transforms into a mass dot. For 27 years I thought they were equal. They are not equal. Mass is a different property of the dots. They are transforms of each other. This equation explains everything. I am very excited by it. I just finished rewriting my theory 3 times. I will check it one more time then I will start posting it. Stay tuned.

Thanks for the wonderful comments. I just finished rewritting the manuscript. I used to be able to come up with the $6000 and have 1000 copies printed by McNaugton &Gunn. I sold some but gave most away to libraries. Right now I will only be sending out the manuscripts in a clear cover report folder. It is free for the asking. Some people want to pay for the postage and printing costs. It costs me $2.50 postage and about $6.00 for folder and paper and ink. (Non-profit). Payment later if they like the work. Anyone who wants an autographed copy can email me at jerrygg38@nc.rr.com. Right now I am looking for a job so I can buy the 1000 copies. I also work as a small handyman business. Mostly older customers who cannot pay much. In Virginia Breach I had a good worker John who had some handicaps but was a good worker. When I left I gave the customers to him along with a good supply of tools. I enjoy helping people out. I miss the good old days at Sperry when the jobs were fun. Things went downhill arout 1991 and then they downsized in 1993. Out in the street for me and 250 other older engineers. Anyway thaks for the comments.

The proton breaks down into the u-mesons and the pi-mesons, they in turn break down into photons and positrons and electrons. Everything breaks down into phothons. The dots are the photons in the purest form. Everything turns into heat and photonic energy which flows ourward from a rocket engine or is used to heat stream for electric power generation. The lowests quanta of light energy is a pair of dots. As we look into space we find areas of pure empty space. These are filled with the dots. there may be protons there but it may very well be that the electrons and protons already self destructed. In the end of the process, the universe ends in cold death. All the material universe converts into photonic energy which is the dots. The plus minus dots then converge back to the inner radius of the universe and then the dots converge into black holes and billions of simultaneous big bangs reoccur. thus we go from a mechanical universe to an electrical universe and then back to a mechanical universe at the black holes. then we return to this state of both mechanical and electrical energy.