phision

So... ...ergo... ...doesn't it?

I don't think the E8 shape is fractal: that said, the length of the wires used and the sensitivity of the pick -up(s)/amplifier(s) would determine it's efficacy at any given frequency. I think it's just a bad shape for an antenna as induced currents would oppose each other rather than sum! Hysteresis would not be determined by the shape,but by the materials used, non-ferrous would be better than ferrous!

Read the nature of time it contains some views and thinking, RE: TIME, and also contains links to other time related threads! Watch out for Julian Barbour in the video near the end of thread, he may offer some of the clearest timeless thinking around!

8,18 & 27 are not Prime numbers! See: https://en.wikipedia...ki/Prime_number

another video

c'est la infini such is, infinity!

watch this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiMigmLwwTM

Do you want to know flux of Muon's on Earth created by cosmic_rays striking the atmosphere or the flux of Muon_neutrinos passing through the Earth?

I don't think muons pass through the earth, as they react quite readily with protons!

Nice as this is! I wonder if the upper-level rooms are so spacious and log burner in wooden home, is the stuff my nightmares are made of!

I love this question, it's one I've been thinking about for a while, and it has significant implications for bang big cosmology! :Guns:

You really must watch the video I linked, in the earlier post, before assigning paradigmatic attributes.

I found this: http://www.fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Barbour_The_Nature_of_Time.pdf ...felt it needed to be added to this thread!

You really need to define time to answer this question but instinctively I would say NO! There are many ways of interpreting what you described! My personal favourite is that time doesn't exist and clocks only count changes, therefor the two clocks only incremented a different amount of change. The slower(the one with the lowest reading) of the two clocks being so, due to the increase in relativistic mass! You may enjoy reading some of this: http://scienceforums...nature-of-time/

this link may give another angle on where the missing minute went to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5rExaKLEoU

Watch this: Grass fed cattle may help save the world if we let them roam free like nature intended!

see here:

watch this:

I think this thread: What If The Boson Is Not The Higgs ? was a precursor to the the topic here and many of the veiws are still relevant.

This web page(http://cdsweb.cern.c...d/1450229?ln=en) shows the fb-1 unit being used more accurately, than the BBC page linked above, as it refers to the integrated luminosity and the data set thereof!

I shall try... CraigD's post seems to fly in the face of your earlier post... and lend credence to my earlier post! So CraigD's post quoted above and the meaning of shadow, in post #26, as, "cast... by a body intercepting light.", it follows that post#36 seems to be factually accurate.

Objects that have shadows have greater mass than identical objects that have no shadow! It seems obvious what that means!

It could be the horizon or a cloud or a Danny Boyle effect!

I think the links contained in the link above go some way to high-lighting the vast array of conflicting information that is being presented to the public! It did, and defines the need for to decide on whether to try and prevent things getting worse or reverse the trend altogether OR just to accept this is happening and learn to deal with the consequences. WE need to decide globally what we're going to do! As for the rain dance(http://en.wikipedia....popular_culture) just give it hard evenly spaced slaps as needed!:weather_rain: On a serious note did you consider all the relevant factors before selecting your trees? are they suited to their new habitat or were they choosen purely for their aesthetic properties. If the later is true then perhaps giving-up the losing battle of maintenance and using more suited species may give a better experience. This web-site may help: http://www.tree-plan...-planting-1.htm