A23

Yes, marriage is for men trying to beg for pardon towards women, but even with a whole life, with an word, or any kind of slight touching, no woman will forgive a man, (maybe if he gives all the money he has ?) this is what I meant.

Hi Ben, I thought about your post, speed multiplied by speed is anyhow in units : (speed squared), anyhow we have sort of "multiplication" (?) for vectors : let suppose [math]\left(\begin{array}{c}a\\b\end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{c}d\\e\end{array}\right)[/math] were 2 vectors of norm c, describing velocities of 2 photons in 2D : dot-product : [math]\left(\begin{array}{c}a\\b\end{array}\right)\cdot\left(\begin{array}{c}d\\e\end{array}\right)=ad+be[/math] (scalar[math]\leq c^2[/math]) Hadamard product : [math]\left(\begin{array}{c}a\\b\end{array}\right)\odot\left(\begin{array}{c}d\\e\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}ad\\be\end{array}\right)[/math] (vector but norm smaller equals [math]c^2[/math]) Tensor product :[math]\left(\begin{array}{c}a\\b\end{array}\right)\otimes\left(\begin{array}{c}d\\e\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}ad\\ae\\bd\\be \end{array}\right)[/math] (vector of too high dimension, norm is [math]c^2[/math]) (or in 2x2 matrix form, the energy 'tensor') the only internal product would be the Hadamard (not sure about the name) product. Anyhow, I think no one of these makes sense in our context.

You mean it makes "no sense", cause I go back in time ? I forgot about this "observer filter". So in fact for photons, we really need an infinite basis of colors (frequencies) to represent the whole spectrum ? (IR,UV,...)

Energy additional formula : I don't know exactly what you're seeking for, but an easy method is : from the most general type of equation we seek : [math]E^n=c^\alpha p^\beta m^\gamma[/math] in units we get : [math]\frac{m^{\alpha+\beta}kg^{\beta+\gamma}}{s^{\alpha+\beta}}=\frac{m^{2n}kg^n}{s^{2n}}[/math] for [math]n=1[/math], we can with this "strange/silly", or what we call "turning in round methods/mathematics" get the following relations, with for example : the triples {[math]\alpha,\beta,\gamma[/math]}={1,1,0},{0,2,-1},{-1,3,-2},{-2,4,-3},... and hence a possible equation with coefficient [math]A_i[/math] [math]E=A_1pc+A_2\frac{p^2}{m}+A_3\frac{cp^3}{m^2}+...[/math] and if we canonically quantize, [math]E\rightarrow i\hbar\partial_t, p\rightarrow -i\hbar\partial_x[/math] : [math]-i\hbar\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t}=A_1\frac{-i\hbar\partial\Psi}{\partial x}+A_2\frac{-\hbar^2\partial^2\Psi}{\partial x^2}+A_3\frac{-ic\hbar^3\partial^3\Psi}{m^2\partial x^3}+...[/math] if but you seek variation on c, you get : [math]E=pc+c^2m+c^3m^2/p+c^4m^3/p^2+c^5m^4/p^3+c^6m^5/p^4+c^7m^6/p^5+...[/math] "The method of people that know nothing to do"

This myth has been removed.

This myth has been removed

I found this part particularly complicated : from the New Testament, Roman 7,15 : "[...] but I do what I hate. If what I do, I don't want to do it, I recognize in this case that the Law is good" So if as a man I hate "doing love to women", I'll probably marry and make love to this women a lot of time, because I hate doing it ? Can we deduce that men hating women have more chance to remain with a woman ? (In other words it's Murphy's Law)

I did like : [math]c^\alpha\hbar^\beta G^\gamma k^\delta\omega^p T^q\underbrace{\rightarrow}_{units} (m/s)^\alpha (Js)^\beta (Nm^2/kg^2)^\gamma (J/K)^\delta (1/s)^p K^q[/math] then using [math]J->N m->kg \cdot m^2/s^2[/math] and collecting the exponent of every unit m,kg,s,K give 4 equations linear in the unknown [math]\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta,p,q[/math]. We get : [math]m^{\alpha+2\beta+3\gamma+2\delta}=m^{n1}[/math] [math]s^{-p-\alpha-\beta-2\gamma-2\delta}=s^{n2}[/math] [math]kg^{\beta-\gamma+\delta}=kg^{n3}[/math] [math]K^{q-\delta}=K^{n4}[/math] We then could build an infinity of formulas like the 2 preceding, by imposing n1=n2=n4=0, this gives a mass if n3=1. There are a lot of possibilities for [math]\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta,p,q[/math] and for example the hypothesis : to each of those mathematically built formula should correspond a particle with different mass corresponding to a certain temperature and linked to the oscillation of a certain wave. This is how a math stuff could try to impress the physicists.

im a basic schoolperson : dimensional analysis giving a linear system of equations, and 'constants' [math] \hbar, G, k, c [/math] Planck's constant, Newton's gravitational constant, Boltzman cst., speed of light in vacuum, [math]\omega, T[/math] a pulsation and temperature, can be variable up to now. The product of all these gives as unit a mass, but the physicist has to determine what context.

In fact mainly the people.

Does somebody know what is the most common cause why some people have to stop studies ? (and the 88' effect) a) dirt ;) overload c) birth d) costs other

God should have been the dessert of Babel, but humanity never reached it, at least if we believe in the Bible.

I would rather say 'God' is a 'non-concept' used by humans when the knowledge/explanation become impotent, end or go circularly. (take care not to say God spoke to you or you'll be probably diagnosed with schizophrenia, except if god is your father)

Hi ppl, Did you already had the impression in science of nature, sometimes several path open in front of us, in a way that we cannot know the only possible one, sothat people may disagree ? Except if the path may lead to the same final result, coz there exist only 1 world. If a science divides human, does this means, this science went to far (e.g. languages) ?

Since a few year many European countries unified their money (even if there are differences on the banknotes), like taking away the separation per countries in a Global European Bank.