Converting gravity equations?

[arkain101]

I've been researching some theoretical concepts on gravity and had a thought I wanted to try and express.

 

What I am considering is to express gravity the same way as general relativity does as a dent in space-time fabric.

 

However, I am wanting to present that fabric with a given resistence so to speak.

 

This is, to consider all 'mass' to dent this fabric to some degree, however, the dents curve ratio and value would be entirely related to the pressure per square 'cm' (using these units for temporary simplicity) that a body of matter puts on that fabric.

 

For example, Consider the expression of [math]G[/math] gravitatinal constant a given value of the resistence of the fabric in a 2d type of illustration.

 

The 'mass' of an object would be represented by this value of the dent. The density to mass ratio would determine how this dent would be calculated and geometrically expressed.

 

Therefore, the more dense an object, the more pressure per square cm this body of matter can put on the fabric, or vice versa, the value of the dent/gravity force, is entirely perpotional to the density and mass of the object.

 

At which point, if the mass to density ratio reaches a given pressure per square inch on the constant fabric, it may be capable to poke a so called "hole" right through like a needle through a rubber sheet.

 

Is this worth pursuing?

Also, is anyone able to easily work this out? That is, to rather convert general relativity, to pressure,mass,density like equations.

 

I obviously would have alot of trouble constructing these mathamatics, but it would involve a given constant of resistence of the fabric sheet for a given force / pressure on a square cm.

 

And therefore you would futher express each atom that makes up that object capable to perform the same effect on its sheet of fabric. However, this particualr atomic scaled sheet would very possibly calculate to have a different constant of resistence to pressure.

 

As for extending my thoughts; anti-matter, could be attempted to be expressed as creating a mirrored dent, that is, a buldge in the same material. Where as, in 3D form this creates a seperation, or oppostion between the two types of matter.

 

As the dent, lessens, therefore the mass of the matters dents decreases, energy is produced and delivered through the rest of that plane.

[arkain101]

To be expressed in a way similar to this.

 

The further down the scale an object is, the more its mass to density ratio, and the slower the time ticks relative to the speed of light.

 

So we have C horiztonal, and C verticle.

 

The object is placed on its ratio within C^2

 

Just out of curiosty aswell

 

Can

[math]E = MC^2 [/math]

be expressed as:

[math]\frac {E}{C} = MC [/math]

[sanctus]

Very ineresting, but isn't it already in the seeked form? I mean if you look at the Einstein equation:

[math]G_{\mu\nu}=cst\cdot G\cdot T_{\mu\nu}[/math]

 

On the right you have the energy-momentum-stress tensor (however you want to call it), if you look at the universe in big enough scales you can approximate it with a perfect fluid where the EM pressure is just diag(-[math]\rho[/math],P,P,P) with P the pressure. Now on smaller scales you have another EM tensor but I guess you can still interpret the element on the diagonal as something like pressure....

 

And why wouldn't you be able to express the famous equation like E/C=MC? It's up to you to interpret what it means...