Quantum Electron Configuration Charts

[arkain101]

I was looking around at all the charts out there.

 

I was wondering how to create a chart that unified most things.

 

So I drew up this chart. Has it been considered before?

 

n integer, 1 or more Partly the overall energy of the orbital, and by extension its general distance from the nucleus. In short, the energy level it is in. (1+)

 

l integer, 0 to n-1 The orbital's angular momentum, also seen as the number of nodes in the density plot. Otherwise known as its orbital. (s=0, p=1...)

 

m integer, -l to +l, including zero. Determines energy shift of an atomic orbital due to external magnetic field (Zeeman effect). Indicates spatial orientation.

 

ms +½ or -½ (sometimes called "up" and "down") Spin is an intrinsic property of the electron and independent of the other numbers. s and l in part determine the electron's magnetic dipole moment.

 

Hydrogen is for example [math]1s^1[/math] 1 electron per shell, and unbalanced.

 

Helium is [math]1s^2[/math] Noble Gas, 2 electrons per shell

 

n = 5

l = 0 m = 0 → 1 type s orbital → max 2 electrons

l = 1 m = -1, 0, +1 → 3 type p orbitals → max 6 electrons

l = 2 m = -2, -1, 0, +1, +2 → 5 type d orbitals → max 10 electrons

l = 3 m = -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3 → 7 type f orbitals → max 14 electrons

l = 4 m = -4, -3 -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3, +4 → 9 type g orbitals → max 18 electrons

 

 

Im wondering, could a chart be drawn in a square like this to unify all states, and properties, then connect all the elements.

 

I noticed that in the macroscopic, things can be squared overall, and contained in that square are particular conditions and values.

Where the constant of C is the square and the relation ship of quantity forms an E, and position forms an M

and we take [math]c^2=\frac {E}{M}[/math]

 

However in the microscopic quantum realm, things are set in a right triangle, triangular formation, and , where the line of zero's represents that devide.

a)There is an over all + and - half of that square.

b)There is a balance between those two halvess

c)there is the orbital type of each two halves

d)and there is the shell value of each two halves.

 

However in this chart I've left out the macro scale relationships, and added only partially of the micro.

 

And with this chart in some completed form, you 'draw in' a desired element. Let say, Carbon. So you drawn in the squares of which Carbon can contain. Instead of using the chart to show the elements relationship, you use the chart as a key, or tool, to work with and understand each element.

[arkain101]

Diagnaolly, we have the same 1,3,5,7,9 and 2,4,6,8,10

 

And contained in each orbital is a value of squares;

example:

l = 1 m = -1, 0, +1 → 3 type p orbitals → max 6 electrons

p = 6 squares =of values +1,+1,-1,-1,+2,-2.

[arkain101]

Here is the periodic table with electron configuration information.

Periodic table (electron configurations) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

You can see how you could plug in that information, to the properly configured key so you could get a visual of element, and in a way simplify what your working with, so its all layed out infront of you. It is alot of detail to organize in your mind, and the idea for a key chart is to lay out that foundation so all the details can be looked at in a different context persay.

[Buffy]

I've moved you temporarily to Physics: It looks like you're trying to discuss "charts in general" but you're not there yet! Expound more on what you're trying to get across and we'll try to find a good home for this thread...its much too interesting for the Watercooler....

 

Uncatagorizable,

Buffy

[arkain101]

Expound more on what you're trying to get across and we'll try to find a good home for this thread

 

Yes, I wasn't so sure if I had it right myself.

 

I am new to these quantum mechanics, but, I assume when something is for example; [math]5s^3[\latex] There are 3 electrons obviously, in the 5th shell. However, when there is an uneven number is there an uneven magnetic? Does it lean more to + or - ?

 

Here is an example:

 

The number Stands for the Shell number. n=1,2,3,4

The squares represent electrons

The + and the - represent the type of electrons.

(is there an unbalance to the element orbitals?...)

The colors represent the orbital type

 

The example I am using is magnesium and titanium. I think it draws out like so.

[arkain101]

Expound more on what you're trying to get across and we'll try to find a good home for this thread

 

Yes, I wasn't so sure if I had it right myself.

 

I am new to these quantum mechanics, but, I assume when something is for example; [math]5s^3[\latex] There are 3 electrons obviously, in the 5th shell. However, when there is an uneven number is there an uneven magnetic? Does it lean more to + or - ?

 

Here is an example:

 

The number Stands for the Shell number. n=1,2,3,4

The squares represent electrons

The + and the - represent the type of electrons.

(is there an unbalance to the element orbitals?...)

The colors represent the orbital type

 

The example I am using is magnesium and titanium. I think it draws out like so.