blakekidney Posted April 5, 2007 Report Posted April 5, 2007 I am not really sure what to say. I could write my entire life history, but I don't think that would be enough. I am a deep thinker whose life has been devoted to Jesus Christ. I am not a scientist and my knowledge of science is limited, though I think it is interesting that science has come to a point where it needs to acknowlege God in debate. Science needs God, or else it is in danger of falling in upon itself. Science is largely a pursuit of truth. The scientist doesn't just create new theories based upon their own ideas, he or she seeks out truth that already exists apart from the scientist, and then tries to prove the existence of this truth through methodical testing. Therefore, science needs to embrace that truth exists apart from humanity, or else science is at risk of accepting whatever truth anyone creates that can be justified by reasonable argument. Slowly, this is already tainting science as we move into areas that exceed the humanities limits of sensation and measurement. We are succumb to scientists creating wild ideas and then trying to prove them. The scientist should never create a theory and then prove it, he or she should discover something first, then develop a theory and prove it accordingly. The day science says, "There is a truth existent apart from humanity that we cannot create or control, and as such, we must embrace as being greater than us (ie. God)" is the day science will have come full circle unto completion. However, as science denies the existence of God, it also accepts the possiblility that there is no truth apart from humanity, reality is what we make it, thus, science is nothing more than humans acting like dogs chasing after their own tails (which means science is obsolete). Blake Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.