Tim_Lou Posted January 6, 2005 Report Posted January 6, 2005 Wohler reacted silver cyanate and ammonium chloride, and he got a white crystal that appeared to be urea.First time in history, an organic molecule is created from inorganic molecule. take a look at this website: http://library.beau.org/gutenberg/etext05/8036210.txt "Until the year 1828 it was believed that organic substances could onlybe formed under the influence of the vital force in the bodies ofanimals and plants. It was W?r who proved by the artificialpreparation of urea from inorganic materials that this view could not bemaintained. This discovery has always been considered as one of the mostimportant contributions to our scientific knowledge. By showing thatammonium cyanate can become urea by an internal arrangement of itsatoms, without gaining or losing in weight, W?r furnished one of thefirst and best examples of isomerism, which helped to demolish the oldview that equality of composition could not coexist in two bodies, Aand B, with differences in their respective physical and chemicalproperties." it was proven that no supernatural energy is needed for the synthesis of organic moleculers, or maybe at least not all of them. Also, it agrees the possibility that living things arose from non-organic matters. Quote
Freethinker Posted January 6, 2005 Report Posted January 6, 2005 Good going Tim. Thanks for the info Quote
TINNY Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 and it agrees the possibility that life arose from non-organic matters.you mean biological life. because i think something alive is one that moves. so inorganic matter has life because it moves. it was proven that no supernatural energy is needed for the synthesis of organic moleculers, and it agrees the possibility that life arose from non-organic matters.yes. it is a continuous process. I would like to agree that biological life arose from non-organic matter, but you cannot state that just because organic matter is formed from inorganic matter. Some sort of non-sequitur, i think. I guess skinner's operant conditioning is at work here. Little Tim finds it very rewarding when he shows that he equally abhors any supernatural entities as most others, as demonstrated by FT's response. Even when there are flaws, he ignores it. Anything stated by someone on the opposite side is closely scrutinized and ridiculed. And by the way, EM energy is needed for the 'envolution' of matter. Every interaction is through EM energy. So if EM is metaphysical in nature, i have no problem that it is similar to the supernatural energy concept. Quote
Tim_Lou Posted January 7, 2005 Author Report Posted January 7, 2005 for what i mean supernatural: from dictionary.com"Of or relating to existence outside the natural world. Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forces." so, EM is certainly not violating natural forces, it is well described in many equations.the website belows gives a ton of information, EM is not something that is considered as unexplainable or supernatural. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism Quote
Tim_Lou Posted January 7, 2005 Author Report Posted January 7, 2005 "so inorganic matter has life because it move"well, i should change my original statement to clarify it a bit. Quote
TINNY Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forcesi wouldn't say natural forces. That natural force is metaphysical in itself. You just don't know the true nature of nature. Quote
TINNY Posted January 7, 2005 Report Posted January 7, 2005 for what i mean supernatural: from dictionary.com"Of or relating to existence outside the natural world. Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forces." so, EM is certainly not violating natural forces, it is well described in many equations.the website belows gives a ton of information, EM is not something that is considered as unexplainable or supernatural. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetismsorry, i meant EM waves. The nature of it as having no mass and no volume, and the constant speed. Quote
Tim_Lou Posted January 8, 2005 Author Report Posted January 8, 2005 then this statement might be true: "Of or relating to existence outside the natural world. But not this one: "Attributed to a power that seems to violate or go beyond natural forces."EM is one of the 4 natural forces... Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.