Ufology_Exobiology Posted April 24, 2007 Report Posted April 24, 2007 I will assume that foundations for dream interpertation have been disscussed in previous forums. In respect to this possibility, I shall begin this particular forum, with unconscious wishful impulses. The Ucs wishful impulses clearly try to make themselves effective in daytime as well, and the fact of transference, as well as the psychoses, show us that they endeavour to force their way by way of the preconscious system into consciousness and to obtain control of the power of movement. Thus the censorship between the Ucs and the Pcs, the assumption of whose existence is positively forced upon us by dreams, deserve to be reconized and respected as the watchman of our mental health. With the information given, is it accurate to assert that, As an act of carelessness on the part of the watchman that it relaxes its activities during the night, allows the suppressed impulses in the unconcious to find expression, and makes it feasible for hallucinatory regression to occur once more?
Queso Posted April 24, 2007 Report Posted April 24, 2007 "Beware, and-Beware- And!BEWARE!" "The iguana will bitethose who do not dream" -quotes from waking life (applied and harmonized)
Buffy Posted April 24, 2007 Report Posted April 24, 2007 So what do *you* think Freud meant by that? Men are more moral than they think and far more immoral than they can imagine, :phones:Buffy
Ufology_Exobiology Posted April 24, 2007 Author Report Posted April 24, 2007 So what do *you* think Freud meant by that? Men are more moral than they think and far more immoral than they can imagine, :phones:Buffy I am writting my PhD Dis. on Dream interpretation and have come to the conclusion that, Even though the critical watchman goes to rest, and we have upon the power of movement-No matter what impulses from the normally inhibited unconcious may prance upon the stage, we need feel no concern; they remain harmless, scince they are unable to set in motion the motor apparatus by which alone they might modify the external world.The state of sleep guarantees the security of the citadel that must be guarded.The position is less harmless when what brings out displacement of forces is not the nightly relaxation in the critical censorship's output of force, but a pathological reduction in that force or a pathological intensification of the unconcious excitations while the preconcious is still cathected and the gateway to the power of movement stands upon. When this happens, the watchman is overpowered. My PhD Dis. will attack this overpowering of the watchman(I am still working on it)My Thesis for Exobiology is my passion, and takes up more time.
InfiniteNow Posted April 24, 2007 Report Posted April 24, 2007 Even though the critical watchman goes to rest, and we have upon the power of movement-No matter what impulses from the normally inhibited unconcious may prance upon the stage, we need feel no concern; they remain harmless, scince they are unable to set in motion the motor apparatus by which alone they might modify the external world.The state of sleep guarantees the security of the citadel that must be guarded.The position is less harmless when what brings out displacement of forces is not the nightly relaxation in the critical censorship's output of force, but a pathological reduction in that force or a pathological intensification of the unconcious excitations while the preconcious is still cathected and the gateway to the power of movement stands upon. When this happens, the watchman is overpowered.So basically you’re saying that sleeping medications, or other sedative inducing substances, are bad because they serve as an unnatural suppression of unconscious drives, which otherwise would be released or acted upon during consciousness?
Queso Posted April 25, 2007 Report Posted April 25, 2007 I think the impulse to eat sleep pills is part of the unconscious balance of our collective mind. Some do, some don't.Some even die from too much magic sleep pill.
Ufology_Exobiology Posted April 25, 2007 Author Report Posted April 25, 2007 So basically you’re saying that sleeping medications, or other sedative inducing substances, are bad because they serve as an unnatural suppression of unconscious drives, which otherwise would be released or acted upon during consciousness?Absolutely-Psychiatrists live by the principle-If you cannot fix it, drug it. Psychoanalysis is based on the principle that many factors guiding a person's feelings, thinking, and action remain outside his or her conscious awareness. These unconscious emotional processes influence one's current relationships, work life, sense of self, and ability to feel pleasure. Together the patient and the analyst embark on a detailed exploration of the patient's inner life. Through the relationship with the analyst, one grows more aware of how one feels and interacts in other relationships. Patterns of feeling, thinking and acting that have developed over years are re-experienced emotionally and understood. By bringing to light the way one feels and related to others, the choices one has made, and the reasons for these choices, psychoanalysis frees a person to see new ways of reaching his or her goals, and opens the way to more satisfying relationships and pursuits.
coberst Posted April 25, 2007 Report Posted April 25, 2007 Ufology Can a psychoanalyist heal him or her self? Can an individual well versed in the science become a much better person by better understanding the self? If 1000 individuals became well versed in the science would you expect those individuals, on average, would become better citizens as a result of this knowledge?
InfiniteNow Posted April 25, 2007 Report Posted April 25, 2007 As an act of carelessness on the part of the watchman that it relaxes its activities during the night, allows the suppressed impulses in the unconcious to find expression, and makes it feasible for hallucinatory regression to occur once more? Even though the critical watchman goes to rest, and we have upon the power of movement-No matter what impulses from the normally inhibited unconcious may prance upon the stage, we need feel no concern; they remain harmless, scince they are unable to set in motion the motor apparatus by which alone they might modify the external world.Are you Friedrich Kittler, because this is lifted directly from him. The state of sleep guarantees the security of the citadel that must be guarded.The position is less harmless when what brings out displacement of forces is not the nightly relaxation in the critical censorship's output of force, but a pathological reduction in that force or a pathological intensification of the unconcious excitations while the preconcious is still cathected and the gateway to the power of movement stands upon. When this happens, the watchman is overpowered.Are you W. W. Meissner, because this is lifted directly from him. Psychoanalysis is based on the principle that many factors guiding a person's feelings, thinking, and action remain outside his or her conscious awareness. These unconscious emotional processes influence one's current relationships, work life, sense of self, and ability to feel pleasure.Are you the Department of Psychiatry at Columbia University, because this is lifted directly from there. :eek: Chacmool and Buffy 2
Ufology_Exobiology Posted April 25, 2007 Author Report Posted April 25, 2007 Are you Friedrich Kittler, because this is lifted directly from him. Are you W. W. Meissner, because this is lifted directly from him. Are you the Department of Psychiatry at Columbia University, because this is lifted directly from there. :doh: What you asser is wrong. The text is by Sigmund Freud himself.....that is why my tread says s.f. at the end.....read his book Dream Interpretations.
Ufology_Exobiology Posted April 25, 2007 Author Report Posted April 25, 2007 Are you Friedrich Kittler, because this is lifted directly from him. Are you W. W. Meissner, because this is lifted directly from him. Are you the Department of Psychiatry at Columbia University, because this is lifted directly from there. :doh: What you assert is wrong. My thread says s.f. at the end because Sigmund Freud wrtote this in his book. Given to me by my mom.Samanta Freud.Do not ever accuse me of stealing my keens work:evil: What you asser is wrong. The text is by Sigmund Freud himself.....that is why my tread says s.f. at the end.....read his book Dream Interpretations.
Pyrotex Posted April 25, 2007 Report Posted April 25, 2007 These are not the only pieces of copied text you have "stolen" from others without attribution. Tossing in initials (like s.f.) DOESN'T COUNT. They could mean anything and communicate nothing. You also write like a 12-year old -- with dyslexia. I don't believe you're writing a college graduate thesis. I DO believe you should stop using other people's words as if they were your own -- or you should go elsewhere.
HappytheStripper Posted April 25, 2007 Report Posted April 25, 2007 Legal Encyclopedia Library > Legal > Legal Encyclopedia This entry contains information applicable to United States law only. Plagiarism The act of appropriating the literary composition of another author, or excerpts, ideas, or passages therefrom, and passing the material off as one's own creation. Plagiarism is theft of another person's writings or ideas. Generally, it occurs when someone steals expressions from another author's composition and makes them appear to be his own work. Plagiarism is not a legal term; however, it is often used in lawsuits. Courts recognize acts of plagiarism as violations of copyright law, specifically as the theft of another creator's intellectual property. Because copyright law allows a variety of creative works to be registered as the property of their owners, lawsuits alleging plagiarism can be based on the appropriation of any form of writing, music, and visual images. Plagiarism can take a broad range of forms. At its simplest and most extreme, plagiarism involves putting one's own name on someone else's work; this is commonly seen in schools when a student submits a paper that someone else has written. Schools, colleges, and universities usually have explicit guidelines for reviewing and punishing plagiarism by students and faculty members. In copyright lawsuits, however, allegations of plagiarism are more often based on partial theft. It is not necessary to exactly duplicate another's work in order to infringe a copyright: it is sufficient to take a substantial portion of the copyrighted material. Thus, for example, plagiarism can include copying language or ideas from another novelist, basing a new song in large part on another's musical composition, or copying another artist's drawing or photograph. Courts and juries have a difficult time determining when unlawful copying has occurred. One thing the plaintiff must show is that the alleged plagiarist had access to the copyrighted work. Such evidence might include a showing that the plaintiff sent the work to the defendant in an attempt to sell it, or that the work was publicly available and widely disseminated. Exactly as I thought.. this quote from Answers.com - Online Dictionary, Encyclopedia and much more.. is my ticket into this argument.. :doh:
Tormod Posted April 25, 2007 Report Posted April 25, 2007 Closing this thread due to the blatant copyright violations. Thanks to all who pointed it out!
Recommended Posts