Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The Consultative Committee for Units (CCU) in its final report for 2005 made the following recommendation, “the consensus that now exists on the desirability of finding ways of defining all of the base units of the SI in terms of fundamental physical constants so that they are universal, permanent and invariant in time”.

 

The second and the meter were not included in this consensus.

 

http://www.iupap.org/commissions/interunion/iu1/u1-2005.pdf

 

There is a better way.

 

http://vip.ocsnet.net/~ancient/InconvenientTruths.pdf

 

There is nothing wrong with defining the speed of light to provide a common reference, but they claimed they improved its accuracy by the 1983 definition.

 

Wouldn't it be better if it was defined by mathematical and physical science constants?

Edited by CraigD
Fixed broken link

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...