Garry Denke Posted July 22, 2007 Report Posted July 22, 2007 666? isn't it 616? and 665? isn't it 667? Papyrus 115 Set the gravitational constant to 616 instead of 666? Make this elusive universal constant 667 instead of 665? No problem with the right Rev. 12 dragon and Rev. 13 beast interpretation. Why does the Controversy over Newton's Gravitational Constant persist to this day? Come on, isn't it the 21st century? Surely the physicists who worship 10-digit accuracy and precision can nail this beast down. But they unrelentlessly dragon. It was Galileo Galilei who first gravitated the Bible's wisdom mark, name, image, and number (Rev. 13:17, 14:11, 15:2) to Jesus himself, whom The Revelation of Jesus Christ is about. Rev. 12 dragon Gravitation's "G", the Letter of God, the mark.Gravitation's "JESUS", the Word of God, the name.Gravitation's "G'S US", the Sentence of God, the image.Gravitation's ".666 x 10^-7 length^3/mass-time^2", the Wisdom of God, the number.[seven heads (.0000000), three sixes (.666), ten horns (x 10), seven crowns (^-7), and beastly tail (length^3/mass-time^2)] Rev. 13 beast Gravitation's "G", the Letter of God, the mark.Gravitation's "JESUS", the Word of God, the name.Gravitation's "G'S US", the Sentence of God, the image.Gravitation's "666. x 10^-10 length^3/mass-time^2", the Wisdom of God, the number.[seven heads (.0000000), three sixes (666.), ten horns (x 10), ten crowns (^-10), and beastly tail (length^3/mass-time^2)] Here's the facts: cgs dragon = cgs beast Weights and measures changes affect buying and selling.All students forced to learn and write the mark."G'S US" image both speak "JESUS".Universally "G" everywhere.Book's about Jesus."G" worshiped. New mass SI base unit prototype again? No, the debated SI definition: "The kilogram is the unit of mass; it is equal to the mass of 1/15 000 000 000 Newtonian constant of gravitation." The one used by Rev. John Michell and the other by Henry Cavendish weren't very scientific. Even the current one of the seven is still just a prototype, the only one. Go figure? Six six six (666), six one six (616), six six seven (667), six six five (665), take your pick, they're all right at high mass and low mass. But remember to power the beast's system with a dragon's notation. The Revelation of "Nero" it's not, The Revelation of "Jesus" it is. Papyrus 132 Archimedes, The Sand Reckoner Quote
Garry Denke Posted July 25, 2007 Author Report Posted July 25, 2007 Obviously no one other than myself understands "JESUS" wisdom embracing solution. In my opinion the Occident West's invented name "JESUS" is the beast since that was not his (Christ's) actual, original name. In the Book of Revelation (gravitation) the mark, name, image, and number are first introduced. It was Galileo Galilei who set the mark "G", name "JESUS", image "G'S US", and number "666. x 10^-10 length^3/mass-time^2" for 1629's King James Version publication. 1799's metric unit definitions were a result of Sir Isaac Newton's (1666) calculations, and measurements by Rev. John Michell (1793) and Henry Cavendish (1798). Men of Galilei (G's scientists) stalled for a decade (1789-1799) to match metric definitions with Revelation's wisdom number and Rev. Michell's and Cavendish's measurements. The "arc of the Earth" meridian expedition ended (1798) upon Cavendish's hidden "G" determined value (1798). Due to politics "G" was not published. King James Version 1611-1628 "IESUS"King James Version 1629-2007 "JESUS" Galileo Galilei (1564–1642)History of Gravitation O well, back to measuring frequency = (G*d)^1/2, for me. Thanks! Quote
sanctus Posted July 25, 2007 Report Posted July 25, 2007 Absolutely incomprehensible what you are saying! Quote
Buffy Posted July 26, 2007 Report Posted July 26, 2007 812? I found the simple life, weren't so simple, no, :)Buffy Quote
REASON Posted July 26, 2007 Report Posted July 26, 2007 Those are the mental ramblings of a solitary mind. :) Quote
REASON Posted July 26, 2007 Report Posted July 26, 2007 I found the simple life, weren't so simple, no, :)Buffy ...when I jumped out, on that road. VH1 1978 T1 RWTD. Dig it! :D Quote
Freddy Posted July 27, 2007 Report Posted July 27, 2007 ...In my opinion the Occident West's invented name "JESUS" is the beast since that was not his (Christ's) actual, original name. ...Thanks!Was not the name, Jesus in English, first Yeshua in Hebrew-Aramaic, and later it became Iesus in Greek? The name was mistranslated/mispronounced into Greek and then into English with a "J" that until recently sounded as a "Y" in English and the "sh" sound is not found in Greek so it never made it into English. Jesus would not have understood when someone said his name in either Greek or English that he was being spoken to. I bet he does not respond to prayers to Jesus either. Quote
Garry Denke Posted July 30, 2007 Author Report Posted July 30, 2007 Was not the name, Jesus in English, first Yeshua in Hebrew-Aramaic, and later it became Iesus in Greek? The name was mistranslated/mispronounced into Greek and then into English with a "J" that until recently sounded as a "Y" in English and the "sh" sound is not found in Greek so it never made it into English. Jesus would not have understood when someone said his name in either Greek or English that he was being spoken to. I bet he does not respond to prayers to Jesus either. Interesting enough Yeshua's name not only appears as "Iesus" and "Jesus" in King James versions, but as "Gesus" and "Geses" in several other Old English versions. Nevertheless the "Jesus" name became the most popular because it had a unique spelling and was easier for a common person to say. Its ("JESUS") spoken sound ("G'S US") promoted the works of Galileo and his faithful followers, the men of Galilei. Their successful worldwide ("G") campaign was launched by the Architect himself, while the Father of Freemasonry was under house arrest by the Roman Catholic Church. "G" (gravitation of Galileo), now you know both, "G" (government of Galilei) :) Quote
Garry Denke Posted August 5, 2007 Author Report Posted August 5, 2007 Those are the mental ramblings of a solitary mind. ;)Old story, New names Kids love Revelation Children Story's introduction to Particle Physics. Rev. 4 1 god is 1 rock. 4 beasts are 4 charges.father charge .333... e (spin)son charge .666... e (spin)ghost charge .999... e (spin)spirit charge .000...1 e (spin) 24 elders are 24 fermions.father charge .333... e quarks(1st gen) down quark - down antiquark (spin 1/2)(2nd gen) strange quark - strange antiquark (spin 1/2)(3rd gen) bottom quark - bottom antiquark (spin 1/2) son charge .666... e quarks(1st gen) up quark - up antiquark (spin 1/2)(2nd gen) charm quark - charm antiquark (spin 1/2)(3rd gen) top quark - top antiquark (spin 1/2)ghost charge .999... e leptons(1st gen) electron - positron (spin 1/2)(2nd gen) muon - positive muon (spin 1/2)(3rd gen) tau - positive tau (spin 1/2)spirit charge .000...1 e leptons(1st gen) electron-neutrino - electron-antineutrino (spin 1/2)(2nd gen) muon-neutrino - muon-antineutrino (spin 1/2)(3rd gen) tau-neutrino - tau-antineutrino (spin 1/2) Rev. 6-8 4 horses are 4 forces.white charge .999... e higgs forcered charge .999... e strong forceblack charge .999... e electro .000...1 e weak forcepale charge .999... e gravitation force 144,000 seals are 144,000 particles. 7 spirits are 7 bosons.white charge .000...1 e higgs (spin 0/1)red charge .000...1 e gluon (spin 1/1)black charge .000...1 e photon .999... e WWZ bosons (spin 1/1)pale charge .000...1 e graviton (spin 2/1) Rev. 21 1 great city is 1 standard model.12 gates are 12 particles 12 foundations are 12 antiparticles Rev. 22 1 rock is 1. They like the rock too. --Seven stars (7 stars*)1) dark temperature: [(hbar*c^5/G)^1/2]/k = 4.2903353(04) x 10^31 K2) electric current: e/[(hbar*G/c^5)^1/2] = 9.8137286(29) x 10^24 A3) dark matter: (hbar*c/G)^1/2 = 6.5907305(98) x 10^-9 kg4) amount of substance: [(hbar*c/G)^1/2]/M = 1.6605387(82) x 10^-24 mol5) dark length: (hbar*G/c^3)^1/2 = 4.8943724(18) x 10^-36 m6) luminous intensity: [(hbar*G/c^5)^1/2]/alpha = 2.2372317(89) x 10^-42 cd7) dark time: (hbar*G/c^5)^1/2 = 1.6325869(07) x 10^-44 s Thanks! Quote
Southtown Posted August 10, 2007 Report Posted August 10, 2007 i can hear a needle dropping into a haystack... Quote
Qfwfq Posted August 28, 2007 Report Posted August 28, 2007 Was not the name, Jesus in English, first Yeshua in Hebrew-Aramaic, and later it became Iesus in Greek? The name was mistranslated/mispronounced into Greek and then into English with a "J" that until recently sounded as a "Y" in English and the "sh" sound is not found in Greek so it never made it into English. Jesus would not have understood when someone said his name in either Greek or English that he was being spoken to. I bet he does not respond to prayers to Jesus either.To be exact it is ιησους in Greek and Iesus in Latin, Jesu (somewhat like Yehsoo) in German and Gesù (Jehsoo) in Italian; the French sound is somewhat intermediate. The Greek letter ι (iota) is the direct correspondent of the Semitic letter which is י (iod) in the case of Hebrew and the same goes for i in the Latin alphabet. The letter j came about in medieval times as a variant of i for the consonantal case; the reason for the current English pronunciation of j is simply the close phonetic kinship between the two sounds. If anyone here is in doubt, compare with the English word Jew which is Jude (somewhat like "Yoode") in German, Iudeo in Latin, Giudeo in Italian and יהודי (somewhat like Yehoudiy) in Hebrew. There are many words which translate with one or the other sound in different languages or even different vernaculars. John, Johann, Iohanne, Giovanni, Jean... ;) Quote
Freddy Posted August 29, 2007 Report Posted August 29, 2007 To be exact it is ιησους in Greek and Iesus in Latin, Jesu (somewhat like Yehsoo) in German and Gesù (Jehsoo) in Italian; the French sound is somewhat intermediate. The Greek letter ι (iota) is the direct correspondent of the Semitic letter which is י (iod) in the case of Hebrew and the same goes for i in the Latin alphabet. The letter j came about in medieval times as a variant of i for the consonantal case; the reason for the current English pronunciation of j is simply the close phonetic kinship between the two sounds. If anyone here is in doubt, compare with the English word Jew which is Jude (somewhat like "Yoode") in German, Iudeo in Latin, Giudeo in Italian and יהודי (somewhat like Yehoudiy) in Hebrew. There are many words which translate with one or the other sound in different languages or even different vernaculars. John, Johann, Iohanne, Giovanni, Jean... :hihi:I have not seen that translation. From the link: "What we end up with is the name Iesous (IhsouV), pronounced Ee-ay-sooce or Yaysoos. The Greek Iesous then got transliterated into Latin as Iesu, and then into Old English as Jesus, but initially the J was at that time, still pronounced like the German J, which was pronounced with more of a 'Y' sound. This is the way that it still is spoken in Germany today. Over time, the J sound eventually began to harden into sounding more like the the French J which is where the Modern English J originated from. The end result is the current English pronunciation of Jesus." Yahshua, Yehoshua, Y'shua, Yeshua, Iesous, Iesus, or Jesus The Sacred Name or True Name Quote
Qfwfq Posted August 29, 2007 Report Posted August 29, 2007 Well what you quote seems to agree more or less what I said, just in my own little way. One thing I really don't get about that author is the reason for transliterating ς as V, I can see more grounds for transliterating η as h but even that is a bit pointless, especially as it doesn't seem targeted at an audience with a great linguistic knowledge. Quote
chilehed Posted August 31, 2007 Report Posted August 31, 2007 Hey, Garry, are you friends with Gene Ray? Quote
Garry Denke Posted September 11, 2007 Author Report Posted September 11, 2007 Hey, Garry, are you friends with Gene Ray?Gene has made comments on his sites which are anti-Semitic and racist, such as "Jew owners of religious / academic Christianity - have enslaved your ***", "Interracial marriage is stupid and evil", "Integration is a racial slop, destroying all of the races", and has made comments on his sites which are violent, such as "Tis Time to kill any educator who does not teach Cubicism above cubelessness. To save humanity from extinction, like prior civilizations perished, youth must redirect self teachers, or destroy them. It is not immoral for students to kill all educators who ignore Nature's Harmonic Time Cube or suppress free speech rights to debate Time Cube Creation Principle" and "It's not immoral to kill Americans who IGNORE their OPPOSITE sex parents who Created them": So NO; chilehed, Garry is not friends with Gene. Besides, four-dimensional Time Quad is superior to three-dimensional Time Cube. Time Quad Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.