Time acceleration hypothesis (Galaxies)

[kmarinas86]

Hello Kmarinas

 

Well done.

 

At last we have someone with a brain.

 

What does this tell us about.

 

The distance to galaxies using the current methods.

 

The distance of a galaxy as of the time light was emitted from it, is still the same as the angular diameter distance.

 

also what does this tells us about the so called expanding universe.

 

That expansion is not necessary to explain the cosmological redshifts, unless we ascribe to the cosmological principle.

 

and finally does this support the Big Bang theory.

 

It does not support it or rejects it. It may be used in the Big Bang theory or with a Fractal universe theory. All it does is provide an explanation for gravitational redshifts, time dilations, etc, without curving space.

[Pluto]

Hello Kmarinas

 

A very level headed person.

 

 

================================================

 

I'm very interested in your cyclic universe. Is this the place to discuss it it or another post.

[kmarinas86]

Hello Kmarinas

 

A very level headed person.

 

 

================================================

 

I'm very interested in your cyclic universe. Is this the place to discuss it it or another post.

 

My old thread is a great place to discuss it as it has already started there:

 

http://hypography.com/forums/astronomy-cosmology/9467-olbers-paradox-only-works-fields-constant.html

[CraigD]

Time acceleration hypothesis - Academic Publishing Wiki - a Wikia wiki

An interesting outline, kmarinas. It’s too sketchy, however, for me to comfortably comment on. If you’d expand each point with a sentence or two – perhaps 2000 words total – I think it’s readability would be much improved.

Have you heard of Occum's Razor before? its a principle that states that 'in the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible' or as more commonly paraphrased 'the simplest solution is the best'.

Occam's razor is, to be sure, one of the great rules of thumb of science. I think it’s balanced, however, by a more obscure rule, “Menckin’s law”, which states:

“For every complex problem, there is an answer that is short, simple, and wrong."

Why are you [kmarinas86] overcomplicating things to produce no more of a clear explanation for why galaxies appear to be receding from us?

Perhaps I’ve missed an earlier, more elaborate version of the ideas outlined in the academia wiki, but so far it doesn’t seem complicated enough yet to be overcomplicated.

[Pluto]

Hello Kmarina

 

I had a look at your link, its on Paradox.

 

It would be a great idea to start a new thread on the Cyclic Universe.

[modest]

kmarinas86 -

If the hydrogen in another galaxy is many times bigger or smaller than here, but light is the same size, that would mess up the absorption spectrum of the distant galaxy. But, we know hydrogen has the same absorption spectrum as hydrogen here on earth.

 

Also, if redshift and blueshift have to do with size and not distance or speed - then why are there both small and large blueshifted nearby galaxies? For that matter, things in our own galaxy that are moving toward us are blueshifted and things moving away from us are redshifted (like globular clusters). I don't see how your theory works with these kinds of observations; but, maybe I am misunderstanding your theory.

 

- modest

[kmarinas86]

kmarinas86 -

If the hydrogen in another galaxy is many times bigger or smaller than here, but light is the same size, that would mess up the absorption spectrum of the distant galaxy. But, we know hydrogen has the same absorption spectrum as hydrogen here on earth.

 

The absorption spectrum should be as expected. The degree by which the hydrogen is bigger or smaller over there will determine the redshift or blueshift which does not change the fingerprint in the spectral pattern.

 

Also, if redshift and blueshift have to do with size and not distance or speed - then why are there both small and large blueshifted nearby galaxies? For that matter, things in our own galaxy that are moving toward us are blueshifted and things moving away from us are redshifted (like globular clusters). I don't see how your theory works with these kinds of observations; but, maybe I am misunderstanding your theory.

 

- modest

 

That is due to local velocities of galaxies. The Big Bang acknowledges this too, that's why there is a seperate cosmological redshift component. The proposed growth is to explain the cosmological redshift, not the peculiar velocities of galaxies that result in local redshift and blueshifts.

[modest]

kmarinas86,

 

I still don't understand how your theory explains the large redshift differences between nearby galaxies and very-distant galaxies.

 

Andromeda or the galaxies of the virgo cluster (large and small) all have negative or small redshifts. While more distant galaxies have vastly higher redshifts. If your redshift explanation is independent of distance, how is the reconciled?

 

- Modest

[kmarinas86]

kmarinas86,

 

I still don't understand how your theory explains the large redshift differences between nearby galaxies and very-distant galaxies.

 

Andromeda or the galaxies of the Virgo cluster (large and small) all have negative or small redshifts. While more distant galaxies have vastly higher redshifts. If your redshift explanation is independent of distance, how is the reconciled?

 

- Modest

 

It is reconciled by saying that we are in a region of space that is least affected by gravity. Not only are we in the suburb of our galaxy, but also the suburb of local super clusters of galaxies. Another idea is that we are the suburbs of more than one "super galaxy".

 

 

The discrepancies expected include vast voids which are actually the direction towards a space with very low density and returning to the center of a high-redshift "super galaxy" which has the smallest "galaxies" near its center. Note that while the galaxies at high redshifts are visually "enlarged", they are still smaller than nearby galaxies.

 

AlienInsectSwarm.wmv http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3374789432044934502&q=ultimate+fractal+video+project&total=49&start=30&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

[kmarinas86]

Jeans length (astronomy) - the radius of a cloud which will be subject to self-gravitation, affected by temperature and pressure.

 

Smallest jeans:

1. crammed and cold black holes
   
2. highest on cosmological redshifts and specific angular momentum
   
3. lowest on accelerated aging and dark matter/energy anomalies
   

Smaller jeans:

1. crammed and hot stars
   
2. higher on cosmological redshifts and specific angular momentum
   
3. lower on accelerated aging and dark matter/energy anomalies
   

Small jeans:

1. dense and cold nebulae
   
2. high on cosmological redshifts and specific angular momentum
   
3. low on accelerated aging and dark matter/energy anomalies
   

Large jeans:

1. dense and hot nebulae
   
2. low on cosmological redshifts and specific angular momentum
   
3. high on accelerated aging and dark matter/energy anomalies
   

Larger jeans:

1. sparse and cold galaxies
   
2. lower on cosmological redshifts and specific angular momentum
   
3. higher on acceleration aging and dark matter/energy anomalies
   

Largest jeans:

1. sparse and hot galaxy clusters
   
2. lowest high on cosmological redshifts and specific angular momentum
   
3. highest on accelerated aging and dark matter/energy anomalies
   

 

The variety of elements along different scales of the Jeans length resembles the variety of light intensity along different wavelengths of a given Planck curve.

• crammed and cold black holes (lowest element variety)
  
• crammed and hot stars (highest element variety)
  
• dense and cold interstellar nebulae (higher element variety)
  
• dense and hot interstellar nebulae (high element variety)
  
• sparse and cold intergalactic nebulae (low element variety)
  
• sparse and hot intergalactic nebulae (lower element variety)
  

 

Consequences of conservation of angular momentum:

1. The standard deviation of the Jeans length among objects in the universe may fluctuate, but its average remains the same.
   
   • Hot nebulae among galaxies leads to black holes.
     
   • Cold nebulae among galaxies leads to hot stars.
     
   • Hot nebulae among stars leads to cold nebulae among stars.
     

[*]Angular momentum reduction in time accelerating objects leads to angular momentum increases of objects enlarged due to gravity.

[*]Accelerated aging and dark matter/energy anomalies in shrunken objects will correspond to decelerated aging of enlarged objects.

 

Future of the universe:

AlienInsectSwarm.wmv http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3374789432044934502&q=ultimate+fractal+video+project&total=49&start=30&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

• Positive radiation flux in the universe will lead to the increase of the standard deviation of Jeans lengths. This causes a "galaxification" of the universe. However, this comes at a price as the presence of black holes (anti-voids) increases as the voids between the galaxies increase in volume. At some point, the time acceleration differential between the void and anti void regions become so large, that the universe becomes a collection of black holes and radiation. Because of all the enlargement of the anti-voids, the universe would have the appearance of shrinking.
  
• In the time acceleration hypothesis, there is no singularity since matter is said to expand in the presence of a gravitational field as opposed to being length contracted. This means that the old "frozen star" idea is the physical nature of what are currently thought to be black holes.
  
• Eventually, the standard deviation of the Jeans lengths of objects of the universe will slowly decrease, as these very enlarged "frozen stars" are woken up by the relatively intense power of the radiation in the time accelerated voids. This results in the transfer of momentum from light to the enlarged matter which is "frozen in time". As the extreme radiation pressure takes effect, lower atomic elements such as hydrogen and helium rebound from higher cosmological redshifts and become the new primordial universe. As this occurs, the anti-voids shrink, and the universe appears to grow in size.
  
• A massive nebula will develop in the voids, and matter will collect to form galaxies. The voids will become less like voids and more like nebulae until the galaxies shrink to the point where the voids and anti-voids become large again. The closed cycle is like that found in the quarks of the atomic nucleus. It is virtually indestructible.