Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted

I had to refrain from calling this thread 'mythbusting' but that is essentially the idea :piratesword:

 

In day to day life I often here people happily sprout (regurgitate) interesting facts or statistics, without checking their validity first. When I hear one I know to be false I like to point it out (sometimes this can be quite the conversation killer if the story is been told to a group.. :lol: ).

 

Two of these common misconceptions come to mind, though there are many more.

 

1. Americans spent millions of dollars on developing a space pen, while the Russians simply took a pencil.

 

This one is so far off the mark in so many ways. Firstly NASA did send pencils into space but because of the danger of the tip snapping and getting lodged in an instrument coupled with the fact the pencil is quite a good combustion fuel, led them to seeking an alternate writing implement. It turns out a space pen was developed, but totally independent of any NASA funding. Finally it turns out ball point pens work in zero-g after all :hihi:

 

2. Daddy long legs are the most venomous spiders, but because of their tiny fangs cant do any harm to humans.

 

Again this one is wrong on both fronts - The Brazilian Wandering spider is credited to been the worlds most venomous spider and daddy long legs can actually bite humans, but deliver a very very mild sting that leaves almost instantaneously.

 

So who else would like to help rid a bit of ignorance and bust a myth wide open? Feel free to share, I'll add some more as I come across them :)

 

J

Posted

I have to say this:

 

I always hear movies, and humans talking about how "acid stays in your spine forever"

First off, the term "acid" is incorrect... LSD is actually a base.

And if it were to ever be absorbed into your skin on accident or something it would metabolize rather quickly.

It flips switches and causes chain reactions, and no

does not stay in your spine forever.

 

Such a peculiar little molecule . .

  • 1 year later...
Posted
Raw milk is not bad for you - pasturised is.

 

I grew up on fresh raw milk, often I milked the cow myself. Have you ever let raw milk stand until the cream rises and skimmed it off and used it to make chocolate milk with dark coco powder and raw sugar? Absolute heaven!

Posted
No but that sounds delicious :)

 

(The right) Cholesterol isnt bad for you, otherwise it wouldnt make up 20% of your cell membrane.

 

Hmmm, are you saying the misconception is that Cholesterol is bad for you or that it isn't? BTW the cream coco was great although I often got fussed at for making it, cream had to be saved to make butter which we sold.

Posted

Gots me another one.

 

That in the US Constitution there is a guaranteed right to the "Pursuit of Happiness". The pursuit of happiness was mentioned in the Declaration of Independence, but no where is it found in the documents guaranteeing the rights of citizens.

Posted

Another misconception about cholesterol: having a high level of it isn't directly consequent to ingesting too much of it in food.

 

It really depends on correct function of metabolism, which should either metabolize or synthesize it and hypercholestrolemia can be caused by a highly caloric diet, even if it's low in cholesterol. A diet rich in it doesn't cause an excessive level, as long as it gets properly metabolized. BTW the "good" kind is HDL (high density lipoprotein) and the "bad" kind is the low density LDL.

 

1. The USA is a democracy. It is a republic

 

2. The USA is a capitalist country. It is a hybrid moving more towards socialism.

I don't see where misconceptions lie, in there.
Posted

I don't see where misconceptions lie, in there.

 

If you pulled aside almost any person on the street and asked them if the US form of government was a democracy they would say that it is, which is not true. the US is a republic.

 

The same is also true in which the vast majority would say that the US is a capitalist country, which it is not. The US has a hybrid capitalist/socialist economy.

Posted

lighting never strikes the same place twice.

 

In reality land forms and underlying mineral deposits can be a determining factor to channel electric charges of lighting over the same area time and time again. My father’s 40 acre land plot is a prime example. The land is a hill containing a mineralized pipe and conducts lightning shockingly well.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...