Aki Posted January 22, 2005 Report Posted January 22, 2005 I think I heard somewhere that one day is actually 23 hours and 56 minutes, is that true?
pgrmdave Posted January 22, 2005 Report Posted January 22, 2005 yes, sort of. 23 hours and 56 minutes is the true amount of time it takes the earth to rotate once around it's axis. It is called a sidereal day, and is measured by the motion of the stars. One solar day is a little longer, as the earth has also moved along it's orbit, making the time between when the sun transits the meridian to it's next transit closer to 24 hours, most of the time. It varies with the seasons but it is, on average, four minutes longer than sidereal time. Here is a website that explains it a little better:http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/section/time1_PhysicalTimeandItsMeasurement.asp
Turtle Posted January 22, 2005 Report Posted January 22, 2005 And further the turtle said, the Earth day is lengthening as Earth steadily slows down on its axis. A day in the day of a day. :hihi:
Aki Posted January 23, 2005 Author Report Posted January 23, 2005 If one day is 23 hr and 56 min, then how do we end up with a year being 365.25 days? Where does that 0.25 come from?
pgrmdave Posted January 23, 2005 Report Posted January 23, 2005 the .25 comes from the fact that the earth's rotation and revolution are not perfectly synchronized. A year is the amount of time that it takes for the earth to complete one revolution around the sun, and is independent of it's rotation on it's axis.
maddog Posted January 23, 2005 Report Posted January 23, 2005 If one day is 23 hr and 56 min, then how do we end up with a year being 365.25 days? Where does that 0.25 come from? The time is the year is measured against solor days (close to 24 hrs). It was the Babalonians who invented the notion time increments of Hours, Minutes andSeconds and their interrelationship (3600, 60, 1) as well as diving a day into 24 hrs.However, there is some indication that the Summerian civilization before had also usedthese or similar increments. All were base on astronomy. Maddog
Queso Posted January 23, 2005 Report Posted January 23, 2005 this fact alone proves astrology is completely bs.if the time is just rounded off at the end of the year, that would mean that the month system isn't constant, just something aproximate, lined up with the seasons.
maddog Posted January 24, 2005 Report Posted January 24, 2005 this fact alone proves astrology is completely bs.if the time is just rounded off at the end of the year, that would mean that the month system isn't constant, just something aproximate, lined up with the seasons. It may very well (Astrology) be BS, for casting Horoscopes about ones fate. It may holdsome merrit about predicting personality traits (though I think it has nothing to do with thestars). Note: Astrology as well as Astronomy use Sidereal Time as the measure of time.Since Astronomy did originate from Astology. People were interested in looking at thesky to better predict their futures. Many cultures had many Gods they paid homage toall to better predict their futures. As constellation and later stars got names, little bylittle the whole process got more scientific. Though it was during the middle ages whenthe Arab culture who had also invented the represention of zero we use today and alsonamed a lot of the stars we have today, that a separate field known as Astronomy beganfor its own sake. So at the very least some good has come out of Astrology. For laughs,I even check my horoscope now and then... :) :) Maddog
Recommended Posts