Wave goodbye to dark matter

[Turtle]

this one's for you Arkain 101. ;):D

 

dark matter is not matter at all. :eek: it is a gravity wave phenomenon of standing and/or soliton waves, antipodally focused in space by the curvature of space-time from a distant physical system and/or systems. think gravity super storms. :) get it? that's all i got. ;)

[Buffy]

:)

 

Wow. A standing wave. Who'da thunk?

 

Where's Krazy George when you need him, ;)

Buffy

[alexander]

The real question is, will that standing wave move a surf board?

[Turtle]

The real question is, will that standing wave move a surf board?

 

i don't know. perhaps if it is a low amplitude distributed set of standing waves (like microwave background radiation), then maybe not. On the other hand, if the standing waves are localized & high amplitude then maybe yes, by going into orbit around them. :cup: :)

[coldcreation]

this one's for you Arkain 101. ;):D

 

dark matter is not matter at all. :D it is a gravity wave phenomenon of standing and/or soliton waves, antipodally focused in space by the curvature of space-time from a distant physical system and/or systems. think gravity super storms. :) get it? that's all i got. ;)

 

A dark soliton.

 

I agree, there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter.

 

I'm usually an optimist, but I fail to see how modern cosmology can reconcile empirical thermodynamic issues (and other physical issues) with the canonical hot big bang cold dark matter kooky energy theory. Maybe I simply have not yet been enlightened. Like my philosophy professor once said “I don’t doubt His existence, but I’m still waiting for His arrival.” NOT.

 

 

CC

[arkain101]

Hi, where it is I fit in, in this is but a guess for me.

 

Maybe it is due to it being in the "alternative theory" section??? eh? hmm... :rolleyes:

 

I don't know..

 

Anyhow, I think I missed something...

 

Cool though!

[arkain101]

Dark Matter Theorem :

 

As all theories, this one is also described in many forms and types of analogies and similar expressions.

 

"Dark" as it were means nothing for the attributes of matter, as it is known that all matter is dark...as in, unseen, though some energies originate from some positions of matter at frequencies of such that are capable to jumble electrons in our eyeballs that derives the counter-concept of dark of which is light.

 

However, obviously it is more than just our eyes involved in the measurements and observations of these lack-there-of energy positions. All our devices are rendered incapable to detect any kind of tangible evidence to describe or define the source of these blurred and dark locations of space, ah but also, 'time'.

 

"Wave" goodbye to that which we do not see, hear, smell, etc ehh? :doh:

 

Wave to god why don't you ;)

 

A gravity wave phenominon.....

 

Interesting..ging..ing...

 

Energy is equal to change and mass... or time and matter..

 

Scratching the E then must have a mathatmical consequence of that particular equation.

 

One of which I am far to out of pratice to bother attempting to demonstrate at this time.

 

One thing I know that makes matter matter, is the fact that matter "hits", "contacts" or if you prefer, interacts in an equal opposite manner amongst eachother. This is something we should look for and for not in these dark matter regions of space and time.

 

Intuitively guessing, a location of distance and linear past time, which demonstrates the capabilites to absorb without emitting or block without exposing itself, simply only needs to be defined as a time space distorted , space-time region.

 

We ask, what is at the hypothetical edge of a universe when assuming there is a size and plausible position?

 

Is it possible to inquire the lack of universe similar to the dark matter theoretics?

 

These are questions that fly out of my brain.. for now.. and here..

 

well..

 

I don't even recall the past statements I may or may not have made on the subject of dark matter in the past, enlighten me if possible...

 

:wave:

[Turtle]

A dark soliton.

 

I agree, there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter.

 

I'm usually an optimist, but I fail to see how modern cosmology can reconcile empirical thermodynamic issues (and other physical issues) with the canonical hot big bang cold dark matter kooky energy theory. Maybe I simply have not yet been enlightened. Like my philosophy professor once said “I don’t doubt His existence, but I’m still waiting for His arrival.” NOT.

 

CC

 

i can honestly say...i didn't understand any of that beyond "I agree,...." Obviously, I can't expound on the sentence before this one. :eek:

 

Hi, where it is I fit in, in this is but a guess for me.

 

Maybe it is due to it being in the "alternative theory" section??? eh? hmm...

 

I don't know..

 

Anyhow, I think I missed something...

 

Now that I can expound on. :hihi: I am always amazed by how you jump up/in and so freely let fly with your ideas & speculation. Quite the contrary for me on speculative matters when I don't feel I have the thing well worked out. Anyway, thought I'd try it your way for this thread. :)

 

So as I understand it, dark matter and energy are the names given to unyet observed 'stuff' that is nonetheless making its presence known through measurement of what we can see and how fast it is all flying apart. That is, something is exerting a universal gravitational force that is holding stuff together longer/stronger.

 

Now further I understand that gravity makes waves. While not complete by one dimension, we can use waves on a pond as an analogy. On a still pond, throw in a big rock, wait, then throw in another of the same size. As the waves spread they start to interfere with each other and some cancel when trough meets crest and some amplify when crest meets crest or trough meets trough. A toy boat floating in this pond will bob up and down accordingly, but by & large stay in its position. Some of the bobs are higher and lower than either individual wave can effect on their own.

 

So the waves transfer energy (our gravity) from the rock (our 'stuff') through the water (our space) and apply it to the boat (our other 'stuff'). My idea then is that gravity waves may interfere with each other as they emanate from mass bodies and that the interference affects other mass bodies gravitationally as if they were actually near other mass bodies.

 

I'm having way too much fun with this...now see what you started. :) How'd I do? :)

[freehoodiatrial]

The real question is, will that standing wave move a surf board?

 

 

 

Please try and give photo! :rolleyes: :cheer:

[arkain101]

 

 

 

 

 

:rolleyes:

[Turtle]

:D

 

:D I like this one. Of course, the dark standing wave is invisible (or is it?) so there is nothing to see. Could Albert hang ten?

 

Just curious...have the physicists posited a frequency/wavelength for gravity waves? My little bit of inteference is so far all about amplitude of the gravity waves. :esmoking::ebomb::secret:0.o

[InfiniteNow]

Just curious...have the physicists posited a frequency/wavelength for gravity waves?

 

My guess would be that this is contingent on the motion of their source(s). Additionally, the frequency would be impacted by the motion of the receiver.

 

 

I found this site which you may enjoy:

 

5. What form does a gravitational-wave pulsar signal take at an Earth-based detector?

 

 

 

EDIT:

 

I kept reading.

 

3. What is the purpose of Einstein@Home?

Einstein@Home is a method to search for gravitational waves from very dense, rapidly-spinning stars, such as neutron or quark stars [11,12,13]. The frequency of the waves is typically twice the star's spin frequency, though other frequencies are also possible. Thus, if the star is spinning about its axis 100 times per second, we might expect gravitational waves to be emitted primarily at a frequency of 200 cycles per second (Hz).

[Turtle]

My guess would be that this is contingent on the motion of their source(s). Additionally, the frequency would be impacted by the motion of the receiver.

 

I found this site which you may enjoy:

 

5. What form does a gravitational-wave pulsar signal take at an Earth-based detector?

 

EDIT:

 

I kept reading.

 

3. What is the purpose of Einstein@Home?

 

Fascinating! :esmoking: So it seems the gravity waves are frequency modulated by spin. The articles don't mention the mass of the stars, but in my model here the mass of a star or any body emanating gravity waves, amplitude modulates those waves. Spin =FM; mass = AM With a range of wavelengths to work with now, maybe we can make some interesting speculations about what gravity waves interference patterns might look like.

 

For the dark-matter-isn't-matter-it's-intefering-gravity-waves-from-matter proposition, this new info only makes the possible number of types of inteference patterns all the greater. Some you can surf...some not so much.

 

Fascinating...

[Turtle]

going with the general rule of a stars gravity wave frequency is twice its rate of spin-per-second, what is the wavelength of the gravity waves from our Sun?

 

1 rotation per 27 days

60*60*24=86,400 seconds per day

86,400*27= 2,332,800 seconds per rotation

1/2,332,800 = .000000428 rotations per second

multiply by 2 = .000000856 = Sun's gravity wave frequency

 

plug .000000856 into handy-dandy frequency-to-wavelength calculator >> Frequency Wavelength Calculator

 

result; wavelength of Sun's gravity waves = 350467289719626.1 meters (350467289719.6261 kilometers; 210,280,373,831.77566 miles)

 

yes/no? :) :)