Antigravity Does Not Exist

[BSG CORP]

ANTIGRAVITY DOES NOT EXIST

Bert Schreiber

 

Abstract: Several experiments in the field of antigravity research by different individuals and or groups

showed that rotating masses (gyroscopes) apparently showed antigravity effects. The two results were:

Weight loss. Gyroscope(s) falling slower or measured gn changed. These results and conclusions were

false due to poor methodology and failure to understand exactly what the parameters of a gyroscope are.

Furthermore, antigravity (as a force/field) cannot exist, as there is no morphological (table) position for

them to exist at. Simply, an antigravity (Riemann Mirror Image of the gravity force/field) force/field

would self-destruct.

 

1. INTRODUCTION:

Over the past years various experiments by H. Hayasaka [1], V. G. Labeysh [2] and many other

of a similar nature, apparently showed the existence of an antigravity effect.

The work by Hayasaka only will be considered, as the end result is likewise applicable to all of

the other experiments. Within reason, Hayasaka eliminated, to the best of his ability, all of the

other possible causation’s such as the Coriolis’ force, change of gn with Earth’s surface tides,

temperature, etc.

However, to the best of the author’s knowledge, none of the experimenters considered the

absolute speed and direction of the Earth through space that changes (vectors) constantly.

However, it has no measurable effect and so is eliminated. Likewise, all of the experiments were

done in the Northern Hemisphere between restricted latitudes.

 

2. THE GYROSCOPE:

Unfortunately, the author must digress at this point. The majority of the readers of this paper will

probably not be familiar with the simple experiment shown in the old physics textbooks as such

have been removed from almost, if not all, current textbooks. A person holds a gyroscope (a

spinning bicycle wheel with the axle extended a few inches, in ones hands, arms extended at

right angles to their body while standing on a “lazy Susan”. When the person attempts to tilt the

wheel, their body rotates. In addition the wheel exerts a strong force against the tilt apparently

becoming “heavier”. Moving the axis laterally has no effect. Likewise, moving the whole axis up

or down vertically or even in a “horizontal” arc has no effect

 

3

The author is not aware of such experiments being done in the Southern Hemisphere as all of the

current experiments were done in the Northern Hemisphere and at latitudes above roughly 40

degrees.

Obviously, if ever done on the Moon, no effect as the rotational rate of the Moon is below

measurable effect.

 

4. NO ANTIGRAVITY FORCE EXISTS:

The author has offered a $2000.00 reward [3] starting over two years ago (EASY MONEY,

1998) to anyone who can show that there are more than three forces: Gravity, electric, and

magnetic. The morphological process did this. To date, not one single person has responded.

In addition, the author has a new a theory [4] that totally destroys all current physics theories. It

has been (was even in the past) that the Gravitational Constant is only a constant of

proportionality, consisting of two parts, and therefore just a number. The author has also shown

that any constant of proportionality can be eliminated in any equation it so appears in. The

Gravitational Constant is not required (and never should have been) in the first place to calculate

the force of gravity between masses. This is also in the reward along with the true equation for

gravitational attraction and the effect that requires only one mass to calculate it, i.e., a/the

singular gravitational force exists.

 

5. CONCLUSION:

A spinning mass does not create antigravity. The wrong conclusions were applied to poorly

performed experiments as all of the experimenters forgot the three primary simple facts on

gyroscopes to start with.

There is no place in the Laws of the Universe for antigravity, as it cannot exist.

[Tormod]

There is no place in the Laws of the Universe for antigravity, as it cannot exist.

 

I realize that your post is a cut-and-paste from elsewhere, especially since it refers to research which is not clarified nor linked to.

 

But this final statement above is by no means proven in the text. If this is your conclusion we need much more evidence to evaluate your theory (which is only mentioned in passing).

 

Moving this thread to physics.

[snoopy]

Im not that sure we can rule out anti-gravity just yet our understanding of gravity is not that good.

 

There is no 'graviton' particle yet that has formally been discovered and until that happens I have to reserve judgement.

 

I understand there has been experiments with super cooled superconductors that show weak anti-gravity effects.

 

If anti-gravity does exist its likely to be a very weak effect for theoretical reasons.

 

Cosmologists are growing in number that are postulating that there must be some anti-gravitational effects or at the very least there must be something that opposes gravity.

 

So for these reasons I would postpone judgement on this until there is more evidence on what gravity truly is.

 

Peace :rolleyes: