Becca Posted November 14, 2007 Report Posted November 14, 2007 Hi, I have been set an unusually obscure physics-related conundrum about the battle of Trafalgar. Apparently, the day before the battle a heavy swell was running (ships experienced waves of large amplitude and wavelength). The next day, heavy seas struck the fleet. I have to explain this series of events. Can anybody decipher this? It just seems to point to a bit of bad weather to me, but I'm sure there must be some sort of physics theory behind it. Thanks.Becca :s
Buffy Posted November 15, 2007 Report Posted November 15, 2007 Socratic method question: What happens to waves traveling through a viscous medium over distance? Thinking is magic: think long enough and the answer will appear before your very eyes! :)Buffy
LaurieAG Posted November 15, 2007 Report Posted November 15, 2007 Can anybody decipher this? It just seems to point to a bit of bad weather to me, but I'm sure there must be some sort of physics theory behind it. Hi Becca, Have you ever done any sailing, navigation, or had a look at the battles sea charts?
Becca Posted November 15, 2007 Author Report Posted November 15, 2007 I have done a little sailing off the coasts of Scotland and the south of England but navigation is a bit beyond me, sorry. I'm also looking up your suggestion Buffy :naughty:
LaurieAG Posted November 17, 2007 Report Posted November 17, 2007 I have done a little sailing off the coasts of Scotland and the south of England but navigation is a bit beyond me, sorry. Hi Becca, There's one important thing you should know about sailing, while you can sail directly with the wind you cannot sail directly against the wind. Sailing and navigation are a bit like vectors in physics. These details can be very important for fighting a battle in sailing ships, as was done at Trafalgar, depending on where the two fleets are and where the wind is blowing from.
Buffy Posted November 18, 2007 Report Posted November 18, 2007 Another hint: Knowing about sailing (and actually I do) has very little to do with the answer! When you toss a stone in the water, it locally produces turbulence. What happens to it? Barometer, n.: An ingenious instrument which indicates what kind of weather we are having, Buffy
Qfwfq Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 What happens to waves traveling through a viscous medium over distance?Er... sorry but I believe viscosity isn't the thing to think about. I do however agree that Laurie was being very dispersive. This is the only weak nexus his replies had with answering the question about Trafalgar, if you get the riddle. :)
Mohit Pandey Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 Hi, I have been set an unusually obscure physics-related conundrum about the battle of Trafalgar. Apparently, the day before the battle a heavy swell was running (ships experienced waves of large amplitude and wavelength). The next day, heavy seas struck the fleet. I have to explain this series of events. Hello Becca!:)What is abnormal about this normal sea phenomenon? There was indication one day before that the a storm was approaching the fleet.
Qfwfq Posted November 23, 2007 Report Posted November 23, 2007 Nothing abnormal, it's a physics question.
LaurieAG Posted November 24, 2007 Report Posted November 24, 2007 I do however agree that Laurie was being very dispersive. Hi Q, This chart shows the battle layout and the wind direction. Image:Trafalgar aufstellung.jpg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This chart shows the progress of the battle. Image:Trafalgar 1200hr.gif - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Apart from the loss of HMS Eurydice the wind was very dispersive to the French and Spanish fleets as it was physically impossible for their sailing ships to go on the offensive and sail directly into the wind and the approaching English fleet.
Mohit Pandey Posted November 24, 2007 Report Posted November 24, 2007 Buffy- Socratic method question: What happens to waves traveling through a viscous medium over distance?When you toss a stone in the water, it locally produces turbulence. What happens to it?It would slow down. Qfwfg--Nothing abnormal, it's a physics question.I think I am not understanding completely, especially its Physics.
modest Posted November 24, 2007 Report Posted November 24, 2007 Becca, The relevant property of ocean swells here is that the longer the wavelength, the faster the wave. A distant storm will make swells of different wavelengths. As the waves propagate leeward they group according to speed. A person standing on shore (or in Nelson’s fleet) will first notice the longer-wavelength, less frequency, rounder waves. They will become more frequent, steeper, and shorter in wavelength as the slower waves arrive. This is an indication that the pressure system causing the swells is nearly upon you. Spain is known for good Atlantic surfing swells in Autumn and the battle was in October, so this seems the likely cause. Hope this helps. -modest
Qfwfq Posted November 28, 2007 Report Posted November 28, 2007 Apart from the loss of HMS Eurydice the wind was very dispersive to the French and Spanish fleets...You were still being dispersive Laurie, by which I meant you were not being helpful to Becca at all. :shade: My little riddle was that Buffy should have said "dispersive medium" instead of "viscous medium", see the answer Modest gave. His first sentence is saying that the propagation is dispersive. That is the only relevant thing. BTW, even in the days of sail, I don't think that battles were so totally decided by who was weatherward and who was leeward. No doubt admirals had to keep these things in mind, but also many other things too, and they knew their stuff. It was a matter of who knew their stuff better. It wasn't Becca's problem anyway, you were dragging off the point completely.
LaurieAG Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 BTW, even in the days of sail, I don't think that battles were so totally decided by who was weatherward and who was leeward. No doubt admirals had to keep these things in mind, but also many other things too, and they knew their stuff. Hi Qfwfq, THE BATTLE OF TRAFALGAR 1805 LORD NELSON 1758 TO 1805 ADMIRAL OF THE BRITISH FLEET AND NAPOLEON BONAPARTE Naval tactical background During the 1700s naval battle tactics developed from the free-for-all melées of the 1600s where the admiral commanding a fleet had little or no control of the disposition and actions of his ships. The concept of the line of battle was developed where every ship of the line had its predetermined position in the line of battle and the fleet attempted to stay in this formation during the battle. Both admirals would attempt to form up into long lines. The two lines would then manoeuvre, sometimes for days, in an effort to close to within gunfire range often seeking the advantage of the weather gauge. Each ship was then supposed to attack its opposite number in the enemy line. This led to battles of attrition where lines of ships battered at each other until one side withdrew, at which point both would limp home for repairs. Weather gage - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia To have the weather gage describes the favorable position of a sailing vessel relative to another with respect to the wind. The term is from the Age of Sail, and is now antiquated. It is any position upwind of the other vessel. An upwind vessel is able to maneuver at will toward any downwind point, since in doing so the relative wind moves aft. A vessel downwind of another, however, in attempting to attack upwind, is constrained to trim sail as the relative wind moves forward and cannot point too far into the wind for fear of being headed. In sailing warfare, when beating to windward, the vessel heels under the sideward pressure of the wind. This restricts gunnery, as cannon on the windward side are now elevated, while the leeward gun ports aim into the sea, or in heavy weather may be awash. A ship with the weather gage, turning downwind to attack, may alter course at will in order to bring starboard and port guns to appropriate elevations.
Qfwfq Posted November 30, 2007 Report Posted November 30, 2007 Laurie, as usual, there's no point insisting when you've been shown totally off the point. You simply didn't get what Becca was asking for help on. And are you also unable to see that, in what I said, I had left plenty room enough for the stuff you are quoting? Can you not see that the very sentence you bolded even supports my point? Do you ever get things straight? If you're unable to be of help, avoid replying to those who ask for it.
Becca Posted December 3, 2007 Author Report Posted December 3, 2007 turns out i was sort of right in the first place. it was almost a trick question. there was a storm (i wouldn't worry about the historical accuracy too much) and it moved towards the fleets. by the morning of the battle it was close enough for the ships to be hit by the short frequency waves. tut.
modest Posted December 4, 2007 Report Posted December 4, 2007 turns out i was sort of right in the first place. it was almost a trick question. there was a storm (i wouldn't worry about the historical accuracy too much) and it moved towards the fleets. by the morning of the battle it was close enough for the ships to be hit by the short frequency waves. tut. Well, not so much a trick question. As Qfwfq hinted at, then pointedly hinted at, then (left with no choice) pointedly beat someone about the head with - there is a relevant bit of physics behind this phenomenon. Dispersion in fluid dynamics. And, when we're talking about ocean swells, it can happen in the absence of a storm - given the right wind conditions.
Recommended Posts