clapstyx Posted December 26, 2007 Report Posted December 26, 2007 The theoery of consciousness leadership suggests that if a realisational process is begun by two people a week apart in relation to some matter then the person to begin second will realise the same things in time delay and confirm realised truths to the person who began the realisational process towards an outcome that began the realisational process in the first place. Heres a theoretical example. Lets say last week person A set out to resolve the symbiotic disfunctionality of the planet as an ultimate to pursue in relation to saving it and then put some thought into it and icreasingly realised what would have to be done. Then person B comes along also trying to take consciousness to another plane by completing a thesis called "the dynamics of consciousness and realisation" with a view to working out a guaranteed way to give extra dimensions to the consciousness through creating thought processes that are original and that person in their spare time is also considering what would have to theoretically be done to save the planet. If person A last week sets out last week to resolve symbiotic disfunctionality and then next week person B embarks on the same challenge and concludes that the most complete objective in reference to that task is to complete the symbiotic construct and have all species in positive association to each other..then in theory person A would have realised that first and begun to act on it first because they would be the consciousness leader in relation to that matter. Their challenge would be to align the realisational process so that both person A and person B were thinking in synchronicity realising the same truths at precisely the same moment in time so that the the harmonic efficiencies of their thought processes could be united under acceleration guided by common ultimates that had interplay dimensions. Quote
nutronjon Posted January 2, 2008 Report Posted January 2, 2008 The theoery of consciousness leadership suggests that if a realisational process is begun by two people a week apart in relation to some matter then the person to begin second will realise the same things in time delay and confirm realised truths to the person who began the realisational process towards an outcome that began the realisational process in the first place. Heres a theoretical example. Lets say last week person A set out to resolve the symbiotic disfunctionality of the planet as an ultimate to pursue in relation to saving it and then put some thought into it and icreasingly realised what would have to be done. Then person B comes along also trying to take consciousness to another plane by completing a thesis called "the dynamics of consciousness and realisation" with a view to working out a guaranteed way to give extra dimensions to the consciousness through creating thought processes that are original and that person in their spare time is also considering what would have to theoretically be done to save the planet. If person A last week sets out last week to resolve symbiotic disfunctionality and then next week person B embarks on the same challenge and concludes that the most complete objective in reference to that task is to complete the symbiotic construct and have all species in positive association to each other..then in theory person A would have realised that first and begun to act on it first because they would be the consciousness leader in relation to that matter. Their challenge would be to align the realisational process so that both person A and person B were thinking in synchronicity realising the same truths at precisely the same moment in time so that the the harmonic efficiencies of their thought processes could be united under acceleration guided by common ultimates that had interplay dimensions. Whatever you are talking about, your explanation of it is much too confusing. One may ask, from where does the thought come in the first place? I was reminded of Joseph Campbell's explanation of mythology as spontaneous awareness of some truth, that appears to have happened globally, with people around the world sharing similar myths. I was also reminded of "The Hundreth Monkey", this is the phenomenia of critical mass consciousness. When an idea reaches critical mass consciousness, suddenly everyone knows it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.