Jump to content
Science Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted
Yesterday it [JPL’s Small Body Database] had the asteroid [2007 TU24] @.0045 AU 1-29-08 @1200 NOON. Today it is @.0038 AU 1-29-08 @ 1200 NOON. Why the big change?
My guess would be that, with only 98 observations over 94 days, there’s still considerable uncertainty about 07 TU24’s orbit. It’s a small body, H=20.162, for a spherical equivalent diameter of 300-400 m, so has to get pretty close to Earth to even be observed.

 

My NEO experience is rusty, and terribly out-of-date (I haven’t been in an observatory since 1981 :)). The best explanation would, I suspect, be from NASA JPL itself – I’d recommend trying their education and outreach contacts, and a lot of patience, since they’re a very well-known institution, and get a lot of external contact.

Posted
My guess would be that, with only 98 observations over 94 days, there’s still considerable uncertainty about 07 TU24’s orbit. It’s a small body, H=20.162, for a spherical equivalent diameter of 300-400 m, so has to get pretty close to Earth to even be observed.

 

My NEO experience is rusty, and terribly out-of-date (I haven’t been in an observatory since 1981 :)). The best explanation would, I suspect, be from NASA JPL itself – I’d recommend trying their education and outreach contacts, and a lot of patience, since they’re a very well-known institution, and get a lot of external contact.

 

I guess it could have been a new observation coming in. To bad the numbers didn't go the other way!

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

I am not well educated on such matters, being the fact that im only in high school. :shrug:

But once the asteroid passes close enough, will not the effects of gravity change its course (drastically?), for better or worse?

~Giles be Questioning

Posted
I am not well educated on such matters, being the fact that im only in high school. :evil:

But once the asteroid passes close enough, will not the effects of gravity change its course (drastically?), for better or worse?

~Giles be Questioning

 

The article does not give those exact calculations, but this bit implies they did them.

 

JPL.NASA.GOV: News Releases

..."With these first radar observations finished, we can guarantee that next week's 1.4-lunar-distance approach is the closest until at least the end of the next century," said Steve Ostro, JPL astronomer and principal investigator for the project. "It is also the asteroid's closest Earth approach for more than 2,000 years." ...

 

It is not clear to me the difference between 'closest until at least the end of the next century' and 'closest Earth approach for more than 2,000 years.'

 

Perhaps they mean the closest approach in the next century of any known asteroid. :eek: Kinda lacks a confidence boost given they didn't see this at all until a few months ago. :read: :shrug:

Posted

Ok, i understand that without any real numbers to look at, its quite impossible to come to a conclusion. But from looking at the original link (Also aware of the doubt behind the orbit/ speed, etc), it seems to me that for the asteroid to come anywhere near makeing contact with earth, they both must be in the same place of their orbit. And i began to fast-forward the time untill both bodies would come near again. I dont remember how many exactly, but it was say 27 or 30 years untill it seemed they would have the correct conditions. (Of course, its just an animation and most likley by no means dead on accurate after few observations).

~Giles is orbiting

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...