Jump to content
Science Forums

Evolution is Fact


InfiniteNow

Recommended Posts

I believe in directed evolution with a goal in mind. Consider the ...

 

You do realize there's a difference between "believing" something and "knowing" something? You might as well say "I have faith in directed evolution" which is pretty much the same as "I have faith in a designer". That certain features have evolved in the animal kingdom is not evidence of directed evolution. To prove they're directed you will need to provide proof of the director.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do realize there's a difference between "believing" something and "knowing" something? You might as well say "I have faith in directed evolution" which is pretty much the same as "I have faith in a designer". That certain features have evolved in the animal kingdom is not evidence of directed evolution. To prove they're directed you will need to provide proof of the director.
Run a creationist:eek2: Its like Macarhyism, lable anyone a creationist if they can think, or see something about life you cannot. Its getting really really old. :(
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my own words..... do you realize how many respected scholars and authors use these types of phases since Castanada ? Is what I said a valid veiwpoint or not?

 

It was meant as a joke. :(

 

In Castaneda's book "The Power of Silence", he speaks of intent and the interpretation extends to moving the assemblage point to "The Point of No Pity".

 

Anyways, your use of the word "intent" is what triggered the joke, or attempt thereof.

 

The basic premise of your post is a valid viewpoint, imo, though I wouldn't use the word "intent".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Run a creationist:eek2: Its like Macarhyism, lable anyone a creationist if they can think, or see something about life you cannot. Its getting really really old. :(

 

Did you even read HB's post?

 

Besides, it's a valid question to ask someone who chooses to assign teleological explanations where none is actually observed scientifically. If someone wants to assert that there is inherent intelligence or direction to the evolution of life forms, it is not like that of McCarthyism to request some form of supporting data other than their personal preference.

 

Do you disagree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you even read HB's post?

 

Besides, it's a valid question to ask someone who chooses to assign teleological explanations where none is actually observed scientifically. If someone wants to assert that there is inherent intelligence or direction to the evolution of life forms, it is not like that of McCarthyism to request some form of supporting data other than their personal preference.

 

Do you disagree?

It like the old Zen proverb " Riding the ox in search of the ox" or more apropos to your stance "Riding the ox and not seeing the ox" There is an inherent intelligent at work in the universe its in you me and in all life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because it is inaccurate imho. Intent suggests that we control what is happening. Perhaps "the way" would be more appropriate.

 

In any case, it's not Biology.

The "way" or "Tao" is the good also but when a kangaroo does what is in its nature there is an instinctual intent involved that results in evolutionary change. Of coarse it does not know that in ten thousand generations of this it may result in a morphological change, but if the kangaroo's "Tao" is good it will adapt and overcome obstacles. It is biology indeed, life acts in ways that can be observed that lead to adaptations.:(
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clay are you still thinking am referring to something religious.. I am saying what’s in life,... you know brains cells, my intent to evolve, your intent to evolve, a rabbits intent to evolve, inherent intelligentsia in all life... hello.

 

"intent to evolve" implies evolving on purpose as if it could be controlled...

 

Define intelligentsia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

life acts in ways that can be observed that lead to adaptations.

 

That is an opinion. It is not knowledge. There is no evidence that adaptations are the results of directed processes, that they are "lead to". Stating your opinion as "fact" does not make it so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clay are you still thinking am referring to something religious.. I am saying what’s in life,... you know brains cells, my intent to evolve, your intent to evolve, a rabbits intent to evolve, inherent intelligentsia in all life... hello.

 

My intent is to survive, not evolve. To evolve biologically takes more time than any individual is alloted. My ability to survive and procreate is what keeps the evolutionary process going. It is the same for all species - even those with no brains.

 

Evolution is a process, not an objective. There is no evidence to support a claim of evolutionary intent that I am aware of. If you are aware of any, than provide it so that I, and the rest of the dogmatic unenlightened, may be educated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...