Garry Denke Posted May 5, 2008 Report Posted May 5, 2008 and called their name Adam 0000 years - 4004 BC - Adam Adam0130 years - 3874 BC - Eve Adam0105 years - 3769 BC - Seth Adam0090 years - 3679 BC - Enos Adam0070 years - 3609 BC - Cainan Adam0065 years - 3544 BC - Mahalaleel Adam0162 years - 3382 BC - Jared Adam0065 years - 3317 BC - Enoch Adam0187 years - 3130 BC - Methuselah Adam0182 years - 2948 BC - Lamech Adam0600 years - 2348 BC - Noah Adam----------1656 years - 2348 BC - The Date ark Built at Stonehenge Shipyard English Heritage timeline Noah Adam built the ark at Stonehenge Shipyard in 2348 BC (see timeline). Salisbury Plain Coal Prospect ditches had been explored (excavated) and cursed. Digging for shallow coal had ceased after Cretaceous / Carboniferous limestone differences were learned at Stonehenge Mining College athletic field. LORD Fellow of Woodhenge cursed the land because his Prospect was barren of shallow coal. The Healing Stones (Bluestone) had failed and were returned to South Wales Coalfield. 4 'Station Stones'; Shipwright's 4 main hull braces4 'Postholes at A'; Shipwright's 4 dock door piers56 'Aubrey Holes'; Shipwright's 56 support beams Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 01; Pitch angle (25 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 02; Pitch angle (30 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 03; Pitch angle (35 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 04; Pitch angle (40 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 05; Pitch angle (45 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 06; Pitch angle (50 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 07; Pitch angle (55 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 08; Pitch angle (60 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 09; Pitch angle (65 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 10; Pitch angle (70 deg) increaseNoah Adam SS 91 ark main hull brace (vertical)Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 11; Pitch angle (75 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 12; Pitch angle (80 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 13; Pitch angle (85 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 14; Pitch angle (90 deg) greatestOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 15; Pitch angle (85 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 16; Pitch angle (80 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 17; Pitch angle (75 deg) decreaseNoah Adam SS 92 ark main hull brace (vertical)Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 18; Pitch angle (70 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 19; Pitch angle (65 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 20; Pitch angle (60 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 21; Pitch angle (55 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 22; Pitch angle (50 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 23; Pitch angle (45 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 24; Pitch angle (40 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 25; Pitch angle (35 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 26; Pitch angle (30 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 27; Pitch angle (25 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 28; Pitch angle (20 deg) leastOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 29; Pitch angle (25 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 30; Pitch angle (30 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 31; Pitch angle (35 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 32; Pitch angle (40 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 33; Pitch angle (45 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 34; Pitch angle (50 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 35; Pitch angle (55 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 36; Pitch angle (60 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 37; Pitch angle (65 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 38; Pitch angle (70 deg) increaseNoah Adam SS 93 ark main hull brace (vertical)Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 39; Pitch angle (75 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 40; Pitch angle (80 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 41; Pitch angle (85 deg) increaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 42; Pitch angle (90 deg) greatestOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 43; Pitch angle (85 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 44; Pitch angle (80 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 45; Pitch angle (75 deg) decreaseNoah Adam SS 94 ark main hull brace (vertical)Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 46; Pitch angle (70 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 47; Pitch angle (65 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 48; Pitch angle (60 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 49; Pitch angle (55 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 50; Pitch angle (50 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 51; Pitch angle (45 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 52; Pitch angle (40 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 53; Pitch angle (35 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 54; Pitch angle (30 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 55; Pitch angle (25 deg) decreaseOak beam to [Aubrey] hole 56; Pitch angle (20 deg) least Live Oak below Heel Stone Woodhenge Dockyard salvaged Stonehenge Shipyard remains,sometime after 2348 BC (see timeline) at the lower elevation. Quercus virginiana Garry Denke:confused: Quote
freeztar Posted May 6, 2008 Report Posted May 6, 2008 I don't really get this:warped: Don't worry, nobody does... Quote
freeztar Posted May 6, 2008 Report Posted May 6, 2008 Everything about it is obvious except for this part: Oak beam to [Aubrey] hole 56; Pitch angle (20 deg) leastEveryone knows that it was: Pitch angle (19 deg) least I don't get it, where'd he get 20 from? :mad: Quote
REASON Posted May 6, 2008 Report Posted May 6, 2008 Everything about it is obvious except for this part: Everyone knows that it was: Pitch angle (19 deg) least I don't get it, where'd he get 20 from? :thumbs_up Yes, but in circumstances when rounding is required I think the rule-of-thumb is, "it's better to round up" on pitch angles. Quote
freeztar Posted May 6, 2008 Report Posted May 6, 2008 Yes, but in circumstances when rounding is required I think the rule-of-thumb is, "it's better to round up" on pitch angles. Oh, ok. I get it now. :thumbs_up Quote
Garry Denke Posted May 7, 2008 Author Report Posted May 7, 2008 Woodhenge Oil & Gas Prospect The Ancient geologic structure map of Woodhenge constructed out of Quercus virginiana (Live Oak) wood from Noah Adam's ark built at Stonehenge illustrates the Lower (Early) Carboniferous (Mississippian Period) Limestone Reef existing below Woodhenge, the same prospective of oil and gas production. Without getting too technical here, simply compare the two (2) geologic structure maps following: It's a gusher!http://www.geomore.com/images/Structure_Map_with_Fault.gif Let's drill it!http://www.megalithicsites.co.uk/images/Woodhenge.gif (nobody cares about this area anyway,just look at that carpark visitor centre) So let's start drilling! Regards, Garry W. DenkeGeologist/GeophysicistDenke Oil Company (DOC)Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488Plano, Texas 75086-6488Tel: 972-422-8268Fax: 972-422-7868Cell: 972-768-4631DOC: 570-788-5282 Garry DenkeDenoco Inc. Quote
modest Posted May 8, 2008 Report Posted May 8, 2008 and called their name Adam 0000 years - 4004 BC - Eve Adam0130 years - 3874 BC - Adam Adam0105 years - 3769 BC - Seth Adam0090 years - 3679 BC - Enos Adam0070 years - 3609 BC - Cainan Adam0065 years - 3544 BC - Mahalaleel Adam0162 years - 3382 BC - Jared Adam0065 years - 3317 BC - Enoch Adam0187 years - 3130 BC - Methuselah Adam0182 years - 2948 BC - Lamech Adam0600 years - 2348 BC - Noah Adam----------1656 years - 2348 BC - The Date ark Built at Stonehenge Shipyard You know, they didn't have last names back then. Also, the Vulgate numbers you're using are neither agreed upon nor confirmed in the bible. If you used the Septuagint of the Codex Alexandrinus you'd get a much different date. Let's see...From adam to the flood in Septuagint is 2242 years subtracted from 4004 BC (which is kind of cheating) or 5500 BC is: 1762 BC and 3258 BC respectively. Could those dates work better for ya? -modest Quote
UncleAl Posted May 9, 2008 Report Posted May 9, 2008 If the length of the ship is longer than a severe wave wavelength of the ocean... fore and aft at antinodes, center over a node, and the ship breaks in two. That is why WWII depth charges were fuzed to explode under a submarine - make a central bubble and crack the keel. Noah's Ark is a maritime impossibility. Test of faith! Quote
modest Posted May 9, 2008 Report Posted May 9, 2008 If the length of the ship is longer than a severe wave wavelength of the ocean... fore and aft at antinodes, center over a node, and the ship breaks in two. That is why WWII depth charges were fuzed to explode under a submarine - make a central bubble and crack the keel. Noah's Ark is a maritime impossibility. Test of faith! Don't be silly UncleAl, we all know it had inertial dampeners and a forcefield :rolleyes: Quote
Garry Denke Posted May 10, 2008 Author Report Posted May 10, 2008 Healing Stones Holy Water awaits SpringingStonehenge's Pennsylvanian CoalHealing Stones Holy Oil Trillions of barrels of Holy Water in welled up Springs below the Healing Stones (and the area surrounding these Magic rocks) await British Petroleum Springing such trillions through Blessed welling to the surface. Coal Bed Methane (CBM) is a form of natural gas extracted from coal beds. In recent decades it has become an important source of energy in the United States, Canada, and other countries. Australia has rich deposits where it is known as Coal Seam Methane. Also called coalbed gas, the term refers to methane adsorbed into the solid matrix of coal. It is called 'sweet gas' because of its lack of hydrogen sulfide. The presence of this gas is well known from its occurrence in underground coal mining. Coal Bed Methane (CBM) is distinct from a typical sandstone or other conventional gas reservoir, as the methane is stored within the coal by a process called adsorption. The methane is in a near liquid state, lining the inside of pores within the coal (called the matrix). Stonehenge's Pennsylvanian Coal open fractures (called the cleats) are saturated with Healing Stones Holy Water awaiting Springing for the free gas. Coalbed methane - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaBP Global | BP Coal Bed Methane (CBM) extraction is a British Petroleum method for extracting methane from this Stonehenge coal deposit. The methane is absorbed into the solid coal matrix (coal macerals) and is released when the coal seam is depressurised. To economically retrieve reserves of methane, wells are drilled into the coal seam, the seam is dewatered, then the methane is extracted from the seam, compressed and then piped to market. The goal is to decrease the water pressure by pumping water from the Blessed well. The decrease in pressure allows methane to desorb from the coal and flow as a gas up the well to the surface. This process has resulted in the drilling of tens of thousands of gas wells, and extensive support facilities such as New Tunnels Roads. The use of this method is currently expanding in the Powder River Basin of northeast Wyoming and southeast Montana. Seven percent of the natural gas (methane) currently produced in the United States comes from CBM extraction. Methane from Stonehenge coal beds can be recovered economically and Healing Stones Holy Water sprung injected back. Coal bed methane extraction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaBP Global - Reports and publications - Conjuring with coal Healing Stones Holy Oil DeeperA Mississippian Reef,Garry Denke Quote
Garry Denke Posted May 11, 2008 Author Report Posted May 11, 2008 Whoa, this guy just completely ignored everything we just said. Is this guy a spambot or something? Good grief! You're too Euclideanically Paradoxicalictic for me so I ignore your Horseshits.Watch the Flood, of Oil, Gas, and Holy injection Water.Happy 100th BP! :shrug: Garry Denke Quote
Moontanman Posted May 11, 2008 Report Posted May 11, 2008 Don't be silly UncleAl, we all know it had inertial dampeners and a forcefield :) Not to mention warped drive :shrug:;);):) Quote
Turtle Posted May 11, 2008 Report Posted May 11, 2008 I love teasing the mystery out of the metaphors. You critics are too hung up on taking the biblical passages as face-value-factual, and/or assuming that Garry does so. The 'ship' references sound more like a ground survey record to me. Think treasure map in secret code. :) After reading Garry's Stonehenge postings the last couple years, I don't see it much different from a multi-use auditorium/stadium of today where we're damning sinners one day, and fighting ice hockey the next. The thing of it is, no one will know for sure 'til we dig them up real good. Either there is coal and gas under Stonehenge and its cousins we find about, or there is not. Either artifacts still buried there or not. May the Schwarz be with you Garry Denke. :shrug: Quote
Garry Denke Posted May 11, 2008 Author Report Posted May 11, 2008 I don't really get this :shrug: quantum dot posted, therefore, quantum dot got it. G-D Quote
Garry Denke Posted May 11, 2008 Author Report Posted May 11, 2008 Don't worry, nobody does... Kindly prove that nobody got this. Thank you. G-D Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.