Shubee Posted July 30, 2008 Report Posted July 30, 2008 It's not clear to me why the Lorentz transformation can't be reduced to the Galilean transformation by resetting clocks, rescaling distance measures and fiddling with clock rates according to the recipe on page 11 of A Derivation of the Lorentz Transformation From a Simple Definition of Time and equations (48) to (58). How do you answer this riddle? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.