Dot-Wave Unified field theory

[jerrygg38]

Moderation note: this thread was moved from the Alternative Theories forum because the ideas it presents, while interesting, neither make predictions that can be scientifically tested, and thus constitute a scientific theory, nor are supported by links or references.

 

In this forum (unless I get thrown out) I will present the dot-wave unified field theory. (A lot of groups do not like new ideas which shakes up their whole inner being of what they believed)

 

I will present the theory in small parts so that individuals can question or comments or disagree.

 

Let us start with the basic premise of the dot-wave theory. If we break apart all the subparticles to the very core until it is subdivided to the smallest entity which is beyond measurements, what will we find?

 

It is silly to believe that mathematicians can produce a set of subparticles which explain everything. The complicated mathematical rules of quantum mechanics are rules pertaining to rather large and energetic quantities.

 

As we move downward to the basic structure of the universe we find three thing. There is a plus dot of 1.13144E-57 coulombs (calculations will be shown later) This dot is a point charge. It is massless. Thus photons are composed of plus and minus dots. The minus dot has the same charge but is negative.

The third ingredient is the bipolar dot. This bipolar dot is the combination of a plus dot and a minus dot. It has no charge. The mass of the bipolar dot is

Md= 7.33982E-69kilograms.

 

The whole universe is composed of these three things. The bipolar dot has no DC charge. It does have spin, mass, mechanical energy.

 

The interesting thing is that a plus dot and a minus dot form a bipolar dot. Thus electrical energy can turn into mechanical energy.

In the cyclotron electrical energy added to an electron causes Einsteinian mass increase. Thus the electrical world is sister of the mechanical world. In effect we can replace kilograms with AC coulombs. Thus kilograms and AC coulombs are equivalent. This is different from DC coulombs.

 

The conversion from kilograms to AC coulombs permit us to write equations for gravity, the radius of the universe, the cycle time of the universe, etc.

[Jay-qu]

Hang on hang on.. you just said three things - but then say the third thing is composed of the first two things.. So is there two or three?

 

Also you say a photon is made of a plus and minus dot and is massless - how then is this third dipole thing, also made of the plus and minus dot massive? you just contradicted yourself..

[jerrygg38]

Hang on hang on.. you just said three things - but then say the third thing is composed of the first two things.. So is there two or three?

 

Also you say a photon is made of a plus and minus dot and is massless - how then is this third dipole thing, also made of the plus and minus dot massive? you just contradicted yourself..

 

 

JG: The entire universe is made up of two things so that if all things were placed at a single point, the entire universe would erase into nothingness.

If all the dots were placed together at a single point we would return to an original big bang which is prior to the cyclical universe.

 

Two things one plus and one minus combine in a "Well" to produce the third thing which is the bipolar dot. Everything we see is made up of these three things. Continuously there is an interchange between the electrical world and the mechanical world. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is the result of mass/electrical energy changes continuously.

 

The photon is composed of dots along. Thus they have momentum and energy but are massless. When we combine plus dots and minus dots in a "well" you get a neutral charge bipolar dot. This has a pulsating waveshape or AC type field. It is this AC pulsating field which has the property of mass.

 

When we look at the dots in a "well) we see that they spin around each and form gyroscopic action. This is what gives them inertia and mass.

Thanks for the question.

[Jay-qu]

Ok, pretending that makes sense, lets see what this theory can do.

 

Can you calculate/predict the charge of the electron? what about its mass?

 

What makes your theory an improvement on other physical theories?

[InfiniteNow]

Jay - He can't. He just got himself banned at another forum for his dot-wave thing, and his inability to defend it and avoid circular reasoning. No math, no evidence, no citation... even admissions that he cannot support it, so they banned his ***. That's when he came here to Hypo to attempt selling his snake oil to all of you. <_<

[Roadam]

(as I have just recently argued with another theorist I will just try not to notice this thread)

[jerrygg38]

Ok, pretending that makes sense, lets see what this theory can do.

 

Can you calculate/predict the charge of the electron? what about its mass?

 

What makes your theory an improvement on other physical theories?

 

JG: The charge of the electron is a given measurement. Years ago I studied the mathematical relationships between the constants but there are always error terms. I use the charge of the electron to tell how many minus dots are in the electron and proton. Thus:

 

#dots per electron = 1.60219E-19 / 1.13144E-57 = 1.41605E38 dots per electron and proton. Likewise I calculate the number of bipolar dots in the electron, proton and neutron using the bipolar dot mass.

#bipolar dots neutron = 1.67493EE-27 / 7.33982E-69 = 2.28198E41

#bipolar dots proton = 2.27883E41

#bipolar dots electron = 1.24109E38

 

Twice the radius of the universe is the wavelength of the bipolar dot

therefore

Rgalaxy outer sphere = radius of the universe to the very center or the outer sphere = 1.50564E26

 

Thus the bipolar dot is directly calculated from the radius of the universe and visa versa. (We live on a surface of a sphere 100 billion light years in circumference.

 

The big problem is that in order for man to survive upon this earth he must replace obsolete energy sources with proton to photonic converters. The dot theory shows the dot structure of the proton from an Einsteinian energy viewpoint which shows that 3.482MEV added spherically to a proton will produce 938.272MEV of photonic energy. This is not added by linear accelerators but by spherical pulsating electromagnetic fields.

Once the dot structure of the universe is understood and the photonic energy sources mass produced there will be no more need for oil or coal to power the Earth.

Our spaceships can travel on a beam of light. The beam is dangerous when in operation but once it is shut off the photonic engine is non-radioactive. Thus any fuel such as water or iron can be used.

We can get to the moon in 3.5 hours. We will ride the light beam at constant acceleration of G. Halfway to the moon we will reverse to a deceleration of -g. Thus except for a reversal of one minute, we will never be weightless. The photonic fuel cell is a very gentle method of space travel.

In Doppler Space Time 2000 we can get to Mars or Venus in a little over 2 days. Pluto requires 25 days. We can also get to Alpha Centauri in reasonable time.

[jerrygg38]

Jay - He can't. He just got himself banned at another forum for his dot-wave thing, and his inability to defend it and avoid circular reasoning. No math, no evidence, no citation... even admissions that he cannot support it, so they banned his ***. That's when he came here to Hypo to attempt selling his snake oil to all of you. <_<

 

JG: If you want the math just pick up Dopple Space Time in used books stores. You can also get it on Amazon.com. It is out of print but quite available. I have no financial interest in it. It was printed once and will never be reprinted.

 

I have been banned by so many groups over the years. I have all the equations. My manuscript has been sent to 100 universities. In another year or so it will be published.

 

Unfortunately most people are preconditioned to believe the status quo. That is fine. This will not produce the photonic engine. Perhaps in another hundred years the powers that be will realize that the universe is a simple place. Then we can move forward. On the other hand global warming may destroy everything before then.

[InfiniteNow]

JG: If you want the math just pick up Dopple Space Time in used books stores.

 

Is that the physics textbook from 1960 that you said you're using, the one that's outdated and wrong on several important points?

[jerrygg38]

Is that the physics textbook from 1960 that you said you're using, the one that's outdated and wrong on several important points?

 

"Doppler Space Time" copyright 2000 is my book by Starway Scientific Press. That was after 25 years of writing. The trouble is that there are three basic conversion solutions.

M = Q (kilograms = AC charge)

M = QC (kilograms = AC charge times the speed of light)

M = Q/C (kilograms = AC charge divided by the speed of light)

 

Einstein believed that mass and charge were sisters. That means mass can become charges and charges can become mass. It does not mean that mass is a DC charge.

Of course we are still stuck with four different things since AC charge is not DC charge but derived from it. As I put the Dot-Wave theory on the internet, I see that it is confusing to people. In addition Some of the professors responded saying they could not understand what I am saying.

 

Thus I have to rewrite my words in order to get the point across better. The internet is good for me to discuss the various point before the Dot Wave theory is published. I usually buy 1000 to 1500 books at McNaughton &Gunn. Most I give away to university libraries because this is my hobby adventure. I do not make any money. It costs me tens of thousands over the years. All hobbies cost money.

 

My 1960 textbooks written by Weidner professor of Rutgers and Sell professor of State University at Geneseo, NY contain the data would has not really changed. It does not contain string theory. It has basic quantum mechanics. Most important to me is the data.

Are you saying that the u-meson shower data is different now that in 1960?

Has Einsteins theory changed since 1960? I may be wrong but to me the other thing which changed is that people got set in their ways. They became over-educated in subparticle theory. That is not my interest. I am interested in the basic structure of matter.

The basic structure can produce an infinity of subparticles. It can produce black holes and stars and planets beyond the imagination. Who cares to understand all the variations that can be produced by the dots. It is important to understand the dots themselves.

Once you understand the dots and dot-waves then you can move ahead. Look at what they are doing at CERN. Look at all the money to build the greatest proton smasher. All I need is 10 billion dollars and I can build the first

proton to photonic energy source.

Someday the scientists will realize that they most go to the basics. They will then discover the dots. I sent my work out to many European Institutions. They will review it. Sometimes it will take a year or more before I get responses. Doppler Space Time got many good responses but I did not understand how the plus dot and the minus dot combine to produce the bipolar dot. I did not understand that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle was the result of mechanical energy continually converting into electrical energy.

The scientists went astray when they omitted the Einsteian energy increase from the Bohr model.

Oh well. Most people give me three seconds. They they decide what I say does not agree with what they have been taught. I understand that. They cannot overcome their programming. Few people have the ability to do that.

They cannot think on their own. We are only programmed robots. We do not compute! A few of us think beyond our programming.

Often when I solved problems at work that other could not solve, they believed that I used whitchcraft. When I designed logic circuits in my head, they could not understand how the things I designed worked perfectly since my designs are not conventional.

I solve the rubic cube by merely spinning the sides without any thought whatsoever.

So it is self evident to me that two dots produce the universe and two dots produce the bipolar dot. One thing good from Brian Greene the Elegant Universs on page 203

"Rutherford said: "If you cannot explain a result in simple non-technical terms then you really don't understand it". On page 130 he states

"There are other physicists who are deeply unsettled by the fact that the two foundational pillars of physics are at their core fundamentally incompatible. (general relativity and quantum mechanics)

 

So there is hope for man. They have gone astray for the last fifty years. My work will go out and things will change. Many will deny me but eventually man will come to understand the truth of what I say.

[Roadam]

Whats wrong with just going from outside to the inside? From all I have seen your dots have charge and mass directly derived from mass of known particles. Prove me wrong.

 

Your book received very strange review on amazon:

 

0 of 1 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars I cant believe it!!!!!, August 3, 2005

By B. Aaron - See all my reviews

(REAL NAME)

This man encountered Moses and and Jesus. The scientific data they gave him, he has studied for 24 years.

 

His forth book "Aliens within Us" provides mankind with a total understanding of God and our existence both in philosphical, religious, and scientific equations.

 

He is not a businessman. He merely does the job he was assigned and hope others will care to listen to what God has to say today.

 

I rarely have orgasmic reactions to science books.

 

:)

You seemed to live an interesting life. From what I gather you must be around 70 years old. Still, do you have any rock solid evidence?

[Jay-qu]

A unified theory should be a little more self contained than what you propose - you should have a reason for the charge on your dots not just take the electron charge divide it by your dots and say there are x dots in an electron.. Also if dots are massless how does the electron get mass?

[jerrygg38]

Whats wrong with just going from outside to the inside? From all I have seen your dots have charge and mass directly derived from mass of known particles. Prove me wrong.

 

JG: Where else would I get the masses from. I started my work in my basement in Plainview NY while working for Sperry Gyro as an EE. I have no ability to make measurements. I must use the data from my physics books and the standard measurements available.

 

Once you know the mass of the bipolar dot from the radius of the universe, then it is easy to use the existing masses to calculate both the number of dots and the dot charges. I will show the calculations as long as people are interested.

 

Your book received very strange review on amazon:

 

JG: That is one person who does not like my philosophical solution to God and the Universe. In general I have many different solutions.

 

In 1994 My first book "The Natural God of Law, Love, and Truth" was published in India with a forward by Suresh Babu who is a son of a former prince of India.

 

In 2000 I published "Doppler Space Time" which a number of professors liked and was liked by many in England and especially Norway.

 

In 2001 I published "Science of God" which some liked. Others did not like my religious philosophy.

 

In 2005 I published "Aliens within Us" which describes the multi-light speed universe. Usually Quality books sells many to libraries and I give away most. That one review by the unknown person destroyed the potential sales. It now only sells for 95cents. However unfortunately in 2006 I realized my error in the equations.

 

Doppler Space Time started at Sperry Gyro. We had 1500 engineers, many mathematicians and several physicists. We also had the secret library with interesting physics experiments by MIT and others.

 

Sperry Gyro was an ivory tower. About 100 people discussed my work over many years from 1981 to 1993. Even today I still have a mathemathician friend who proof reads my work.

 

So it has been 27 years of work and I am still working on it. I still have a lot to do.

 

 

:)

You seemed to live an interesting life. From what I gather you must be around 70 years old. Still, do you have any rock solid evidence?

 

JG: Yes. I will be 70 on Dec 24.

I worked for Con Edison. I designed 4kv lighting systems in the Bronx

I worked for the City of NY- I did the Long Island Expressway lighting. I did the Hutchinson River Parkway lighting. I did the 59th street Bridge. I walked the Verrezono Bridge when only the upper side steel rail existed. It was scarry as hell.

I worked at Sperry Gyro then Sperry Rand and later Unisys. I did the SDC/GMP signal data converter/gun mount processer for the Aegisl class destroyers. My 5 inch gun system worked the first time and everytime.

I fixed Polaris missle problems. I worked the Nexrad system. I worked the Ring Lazer Gyro. I worked the SAWS submarine system. It was a lot of fun until the big downsizing of 1993. 250 older Engineers thrown out one day. Yes we won a class action suit but only got pennies on the dollar. The judge said it was better to get something than nothing. The lawyers made out.

So I became a handyman part time. Right now I am out of work having moved to Cary NC from Virginia Beach. In the spring I will return to the handyman business so I can earn enough money to pay for the "Dot wave theory publication). It costs $6000 for 1000 books at McNaughton & Gunn.

It is my hobby.

 

I have my list of readers. There are a hundred people who buy my books as soon as I finish them. Quality books sells some. But I give most away. So it is a hobby and not a business.

 

In any event one Florida University agreed to review the book. Also Norway said they would study it. I am awaiting the military response. Unfortunately the photonic converter can be used to destroy incoming missles and enemy armies. It could be used for good or be a terrible weapon.

 

I have had fun at work and in my studies. If no one understands it or likes it, it doesn't matter much to me because I only have a few more years to go. If I was successful long ago, then I would be out of luck today. Others more brilliant then myself would have advanced far beyond me. So I would have nothing to do all these years. Once thing nice about the Dot-wave theory is that there are so many things to study and calculate.

[jerrygg38]

A unified theory should be a little more self contained than what you propose - you should have a reason for the charge on your dots not just take the electron charge divide it by your dots and say there are x dots in an electron.. Also if dots are massless how does the electron get mass?

 

JG: Good question. I see you think about things well. Let us look the time of the universe since big bang;

 

The force between two hydrogen atoms can be considered due to the interaction of the spinning electron of the first atom and the Bohr expansion velocity of the second atom and visa versa. This is an emperical best fit equation. It can be argued that it is not accurate enough but from an engineering viewpoint it is important to have a method to solve the radius of the universe since big bang.

 

F = 2 (Uo (QC/137.036) x (4 pi Q V*) / RR (2-14)

 

In equation 2-14 of the Dot-wave theory, the force between two hydrogen atoms can be looked as as an equivalent magnetic force of the electron in the Bohr orbit of atom one and the expansion of the Bohr orbit of atom 2. Likewise the force of the second atom electron interacts with the Bohr orbit expansion velocity of the first atom. Therefore the factor or 2 is involved.

 

Solving for V* , the Bohr orbit expansion velocity we get

 

V* = 1.053667E-28 meters per second

Since the Bohr orbit was basically zero after big bang, the time since big bang by this straight line Engineering approximation is

To = 5.02227E17 seconds

To = 15.9145 billion years.

 

The radius of the photonic field from the galaxy center to the outer radius of the galaxy is 1.50564E26

 

This is an engineering method. Future scientists can produce more accurate methods but I am limited to an Engineering model. As such the atom works whether the final radius of the universe is 20 percent higher or lower. It does not matter since first we make the photonic converter work and later we refine the theory to exact specificiations.

 

The smallest subparticle in the universe can have a wavelength either the radius of the universe or twice the radius. Using twice the radius we get

for h= 6.62608E-34, C = 2.9979E8

Energy of dot pair =6.59668E-52

The dot pair mass = 7.33982E-69kilograms

 

We can then calculate the dots per neutron as

# bipolar dots = Mn /Md = 2.28198E41

The proton has

#bipolar dots proton = 2.27883E41

# bipolar dots electron = 1.24109E38

 

That is the easy part.

(To be continued - sometimes all my work is lost so I transmit in sections)

[jerrygg38]

Reply continued:

 

Now we have the problem of finding how many charges exist in the electron and proton. the mass depends only on the bipolar dots. the plus and minus dots do not have the property of mass.

 

Now we must look at the Einsteinian energy of an electron as it reaches the proton radius. In Doppler Space Time the Einsteinian energy at a radius of

1.31959E-15 involves a speed of 0.9186C. Thus an electron absorbs energy from the electric field which brings it up to 0.9186C.

At 0.9186C the mass of the electron in the neutrons orbit is

Me*/Me = 2.53043 thus the mass/energy of the electron is

Me = 1.293 MEV

 

This means that most of the energy increase for the neutron is caused by the conversion of electrical charge into mass.

 

the mass of the neutrino is only 0.20178MEV

 

Scientists have not realized that the conversion from electrical energy in the proton/electron combination produces mass.

 

the delta mass for the conversion process is

 

Delta mass = Mn - (Me +Mp +M9neutrino) = 1.039356E-30

 

We now know that the delta mass is the product of the electrical energy

 

We know the dots per kilograms

 

We now can calculate the number of bi-polar dots in the difference

 

# mass difference bipolar dots = Difference /Md = 1.410605E38

 

Therefore there are 1.410605 pairs of dots which are split to form the plus dots and minus dots of the electron and proton.

 

Charge per dot = Q/#dots = 1.13144E-57 coulombs

 

It can be argued that these are only first order Engineering calculations. More fancy scientific calculations will change the numbers a cerain percentage. However when we build the first photonic converter, it does not matter if we get 20 percent more energy or 20 percent less energy out of it.

The important thing is that electrical energy produces mass and mass produces electrical energy.

[Roadam]

Where did you get Bohr expansion velocity, or at least who else uses it?

 

Even if it is true, this would mean that atoms are getting bigger, and so the universe is getting bigger and we are getting bigger, and thus we cant measure the difference of the size of an atom.

[Theory5]

But how do you support your theory without using circular reasoning?

 

More fancy scientific calculations will change the numbers a cerain percentage.

Care to elaborate on these "fancy" calculations?

 

And by Photonic converter do you mean one of those quantum cascade lasers? The quantum cascade lasers were thought of and were first demonstrated in 1994 by Jerome Faist, Federico Capasso, Deborah Sivco, Carlo Sirtori, Albert Hutchinson, and Alfred Cho at Bell Laboratories.

And I belive those lasers are being developed already.

 

Aegisl class destroyers

See this is why I have a reason to doubt you. There is no such thing as an aegis class destroyer, The aegis system and the ship that it is mounted on have no relation to each other. The first ships who where built with it were modeled after the Spruance-class destroyers.

 

I also find it interesting that you do not mention that you worked for Lockheed Martin.

 

You also mention that we are "close-minded" and only belive what we were taught. I belive I should mention, as it has been mentioned before and will be mentioned again, that we as a scientific community are VERY open minded. But our "flaw" is that we want theory's and other new idea's to be backed up by something other than circular reasoning.

 

if there is a "massless" atom photon or otherwise, does it exist? Everything has mass, no matter how small it is.

 

The big problem is that in order for man to survive upon this earth he must replace obsolete energy sources with proton to photonic converters.

 

But isnt photonics the science of generating, controlling, and detecting photons?

 

Please help me to understand this.

-Theory