matrixscarface Posted February 26, 2005 Report Posted February 26, 2005 Does anyone know abou the "riemann hypothesis" and/or "the riemann zeta function"?? i hear tell that claymath put a million dollar reward on whoever could solve it among other problems but... what is it????
Tormod Posted February 26, 2005 Report Posted February 26, 2005 The Riemann hypothesis is a mathematical puzzle. There are actually many of them, but I assume you mean the one that is derived from the prime number theorem. There is some info here:http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RiemannZetaFunction.html
matrixscarface Posted February 26, 2005 Author Report Posted February 26, 2005 i have been here, but what does this all mean?? and what other ones?
Bo Posted February 27, 2005 Report Posted February 27, 2005 in genberal a zeta function is a function of the form: f(s) = sum (n=0 to inf) g(n)^(-s)the Rieman zeta function isgiven by: f(s)= sum(n=0 to inf) n^(-s). So for example: f(2)=0+1^(-2)+2^(-2)+3^(-2)+... etc. Zeta functions are extremely important especially in number theorem (the function f(s) is related to the number of prime's smaller then s) and it can be used to solve certain integrals.The riemann hypothesis is that the euation f(s)=0, holds if the real part of s is 1/2. I hope this is more clear. Bo
matrixscarface Posted March 2, 2005 Author Report Posted March 2, 2005 i still don't get it, i didn't understand a word you just said. please explain this in a simple term i wanna solve it.. help the curious
Tormod Posted March 2, 2005 Report Posted March 2, 2005 matrix, if you want to solve the Riemann hypothesis you probably need to understand what Bo just wrote. :naughty: I read a good book last summer about the RH: Marcus du SautoyThe music of the Primes: Searching to solve the greatest mystery in mathematics http://www.hypography.com/amazon_detail.cfm?asin=0066210704 Highly recommended.
Bo Posted March 4, 2005 Report Posted March 4, 2005 like tormod said: if you diddn't understood my post you will have a very hard time proving the riemann hypothesis (remember that this is a problem where in the past century the smartest mathematiciens in the world have worked on...) Well let's see if i can be more clearly:the Rieman zeta function isgiven by: f(s)= sum(n=0 to inf) n^(-s). so this is a function f, that depends on some complex number s (complex numbers are numbers with a real and an imaginary component). This function is given by an infinite sum n^(-s) (^means 'to the power of'). so the first components of this sum are:n=0 --> 0^(-s) =0n=1 --> 1^(-s)n=2 --> 2^(-s)etc.so f(s) is given by 0+1^(-s)+2^(-s)+.... etc until infinity. The riemann hypothesis is that the euation f(s)=0, holds if the real part of s is 1/2. Bo
Recommended Posts