belovelife Posted December 26, 2008 Report Posted December 26, 2008 first i uses the wrong word -vacumei meant to say that magnetism was the force that pulled the electrons to the nucleusIf' date=' as a deep inelastic scattering experiment, we force an electron near this two-mutually-exclusive-things-at-once entity so that the electron can exchange photons with one or both of the quarks, we “see” its quark properties. When another quark absorbs it to change color charge and momentum, its gluon properties are manifest. Hence, what a proton or neutron is really built of isn’t, in everyday terms, objectively real, but depends on how we’re measuring it.[/quote']but couldn't the qluon be an itermident state of matterlike the setting of the matter berfore it achieves particle-antiparticle?(although i may be grasping here) and on the vortexyea i havn't been there myselfbut if i did go i would bring a chess board looking sheetif the bend in space time that i submit occursthen the sheet would be square at t its points but the size of the squares would changeon the way to the other side Quote
belovelife Posted December 28, 2008 Author Report Posted December 28, 2008 YouTube - Time-Lapse Movie Of Crab Pulsar Wind http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5u5nXZqYq0&feature=PlayList&p=19CD5DE5E3760C11&index=5you'll see the effect i'm talking aboutthe condensing of the matter to a single point hence pushing at awayand the effect of expantion of space creating a bubble at the top Quote
belovelife Posted December 28, 2008 Author Report Posted December 28, 2008 this also states that there would be matter immune to the warpwhich would be able to create a movble shell (the right side) Quote
belovelife Posted January 9, 2009 Author Report Posted January 9, 2009 now i don't theink that this element is made in just any stellar reactiononly a fewbut i think it is still abundantand i think it organizes galaxiesto a disc shape, along with magnetism Quote
belovelife Posted January 10, 2009 Author Report Posted January 10, 2009 what is the difference between increasing magnetism and decreasing magnetism? Quote
belovelife Posted March 22, 2009 Author Report Posted March 22, 2009 this whole process would be bending the string of time to a less than 0, where as you approach 1, it is the maximum movement of time, as you approah -1 it would be the minimum speed of time ref. http://hypography.com/forums/strange-claims-forum/18101-belovelifes-unification-theory.htmlhttp://hypography.com/forums/philosophy-of-science/18942-conceptual-science.html where you would need to increase magnetism to allow for the potential change in the values of the distances in space timeby decreasing the amount of time to traverse space, or decreasing the amount of space to travel in a given time Quote
belovelife Posted March 23, 2009 Author Report Posted March 23, 2009 as time moves space and matter have a strange relation only observable being in time observing the reaction of the electron/photon relation and the impetali processreacting in space Quote
belovelife Posted March 23, 2009 Author Report Posted March 23, 2009 so on the x<-|->y axiselectron photonat the instace of -1+1-1 being photon+1 being the electron -1 would be the stopping of time, where the movement of space through time drags the electron along +1 would be time accelerated where the magnetism of the impetali reaction holds it in place ? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.