Cold fission (or fusion)

[belovelife]

could we super freeze hydrogen

then strip the electrons similar to stripping the electrons in the halogen collider

 

if so then would this cause the protons to gather and fuse a new nucleus

 

or would it change the angular momentum of the energy of the proton

and convert it to electrons and photons

 

probable depends on the polarity placement of the magnetic field involve

and or 2 magnetic fields

[belovelife]

well how about super cooling hydrogen

then put it through a flow chamber that strips electrons

then then next chamber is the reacton chamber

in a rotary style engine

 

extremely large engine

but it would push an extremely large generator

 

so you harness the potential energy stored in the reaction process

then using magnetic fields and such convert it into electricity

in the same fashon as the traditional power generation

[belovelife]

mabe using duterium or triterium for added mass to connect the protons

[CraigD]

could we super freeze hydrogen

We can. Hydrogen was first successfully frozen in 1899. Its melting point is about 14 K.

then strip the electrons similar to stripping the electrons in the halogen collider

Stripping the electrons from hydrogen, that is, ionizing it, is easy, and unavoidable in many commonplace substances. For example, in exactly neutral water, one in exactly every 10 million ([math]10^{-7}[/math], or pH 7) hydrogen atoms have been ionized.

 

Nearly all of the hydrogen in the solar wind is ionized

if so then would this cause the protons to gather and fuse a new nucleus

No.

 

Protons are positively charged, and thus repel one another. For fusion to occur, an equal or greater force must overcome this repulsive force. This is known to occurs only under hot, dense conditions, such as the core of stars and nuclear bombs.

 

or would it change the angular momentum of the energy of the proton and convert it to electrons and photons

This question makes no sense.

 

Angular momentum and energy are distinct physical concepts. There’s no such thing as “the angular momentum of the energy of the proton”

probable depends on the polarity placement of the magnetic field involve and or 2 magnetic fields

Again, these words make no sense.

 

Belovelife, can you provide references to any of this? I fear that you are just randomly stinging together words into phrases that seem to you to have meaning. This isn’t an appropriate thing to do at a science site.

[belovelife]

why was my other idea deleted

 

it could have added the extra force neccisary for the fusion

[lawcat]

Fleischmann and Pons did the cold fusion experiment in the 80s that allegedly yielded results. Others tried to replicate the experiement and came up with failed results. Then, Fleischmann's cold fusion was labeled Ponzi scheme. The basoc equation is:

 

palladium + deuterium, in pressence of electrical current = nuclear power

 

Whatever happened with that? The critics say that Fleischmann and other proponents keep mismeasuring the input energy which makes the fusion appear more efficient than it really is. But how likely is it to mismeasure input current? This seems elementary to me.

[Moontanman]

Actually a few experiments with cold fusion have been yielding results, IE energetic neutrons, the non repeatability of the older experiments was claimed to be due to differences in the metal used and how the metal was cast or it's crystalline structure. So far the jury is still out.... But as you can see from this wikki the burden of proof is still not being met in any repeatable fashion.

 

Cold fusion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia