The Beginning. Is It Possibly?

[freeztar]

You are right, the frequency would increase lockstep and an outside observer would see time stopped so observe no changes. As far as I know most think that particles falling into a BH assume they will remain particles and yet in our world we give them the Dr. Jykle and Mr. Hyde wave particle duality. I personally dislike the notion because it's like saying a truck can suddenly turn into an elephant by way of virtual photons.

 

But dislike needs to be separated from unacceptance.

 

I'm not comfortable with sub-atomic particles, but that doesn't mean I can't accept the reality of their existence.

 

Are leptons and quarks not "real"?

[Little Bang]

Is it to difficult to imagine we could predict a particular waveform from a postulated collision of a given energy and call that temporary waveform a particle? Isn't it possible that because they could not explain matter any other way they chose to use these postulated particles?

[freeztar]

Is it to difficult to imagine we could predict a particular waveform from a postulated collision of a given energy and call that temporary waveform a particle?

 

No.

 

Isn't it possible that because they could not explain matter any other way they chose to use these postulated particles?

 

Yes, I think that's how it works. Theory dictates experiment and vice versa.

I'm not set on the standard model, but this thread really isn't about that.

 

I still like the thought of the beginning being a singularity consisting of waves that experience infinite (for all practical purposes) time dilation. :rolleyes: