Can energy of an atom nucleus/core change?

[buddha elämuni]

About 13.8 billion years ago universe -as we see it - had its energy very densely formed. Nowadays the same energy is way more than less condensed.

 

There is no reason to doubt that same phenomenon couldnt effect on the very same energy that the nucleus of an atom has!

 

Nucleuses of atoms had accordingly changed for less dense energy. Concomitantly expanding atom nucleuses have radiated their energy in a form of waves which have nature of electrons and particles.

 

Electrons confront energy-waves from the adjacent atom nucleuses and interact with them. At this point new electrons are born in to them which create changes of pressure into energy-waves that they confront etc.

 

After the interaction electrons continue towards nucleus of an atom, make the nucleus explode their energy to that very same direction where that electron came. Because of that the expanding nucleus trembles to opposing direction and so forth.

 

 

2. All the time particles move through and past atom nucleuses which also change to less dense energy and radiate their energy in waves. Quarks ? fuel up? i.e. absorb this ?raw-material? (energy) all the time and so the recycling of the energy continues.

 

After some period of time energy of the quarks energy can change at which point quark has won?t have any of that energy which it earlier had?

 

It raises up the question, Does for example cores of the atoms in old buildings switched their energy upon a time, hence there wouldn?t be any of that energy which the building had just after the construction?

 

Stars and planets are like big ?fish traps? or ?fish nets? which absorb more and more of that same ?raw material? (energy) which from everything around us constructs. In the same time they change to contain less and less dense energy.

 

3. Three dimensional expansion creates a pressure which in other hand creates all the expanding objects radiate themselves i.e. energy in waves which have the character of different energy concentration etc.

 

Density of the eternal energy changes in the eternal space, which will never change!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The substance does not alter to an energy. The substance itself is energy.

 

The substance / The energy alters all the time to a less dense substance / energy.

 

The substance / The energy alters to a less dense energy in a space that has always existed. The space does not increase! The space does not expand or curve!

 

The whole concept of expanding space has been pulled out of the hat, because people has believed that the pulling force does exist. There is no such force as pulling force!

 

The Quarks

 

The quarks are formed out of energy that alters all the time to a less dense energy. The quarks expand and radiate energy waves. These waves the expading qvarks push themselves away from each other.

 

The quarks absorb more energy from the particles that move through the quarks. When the expanding quarks push themselves away from each other the energy radiating from the quarks pass and pushing becomes weaker.

 

The quarks continue to expand, at the same time they come closer to each other without actually moving towards each other and the pushing strenghens. An external pressure is directed towards the quarks because more energy from the other atomcores and from those particles that move in an area between the atomcores and radiate their energy towards the atomcores.

 

The pattern of an atom

 

The energy of the atomcore alters to a less dense energy. The atom core expands and radiates energywaves that have the nature of electron and

particule. Also the electrons and the particules alter to a less dense energy and radiate their energy as waves.

 

The atomcore absorbs as if it would fill up more energy towards itselef from those particules that pass the atomcores or through the core. So the

particules also alter to a less dense energy and radiate their energy. The particules also absorb energy towards themselves from the radiation of the other particules.

 

The electrons continue their journey towards atomcores nearby. They have interaction with the energy waves that they meet. They produce variation of pressure and with confronting energy-wawes new electrons are produced.

 

These electrons continue their journey towards atomcores nearby etc. After that the energy itself continues towards the atomcore and makes the atomcore to explode in other words to change faster into a less dense energy ect.

 

One Simple Principle » Introduction * » Map for pages *

 

.

[buddha elämuni]

I DEMAND LOGICALITY

 

We need to expect even a little bit of logicality to the scientific theories.

 

If I have understood correctly, according to the so called firm interaction the qvarks supposedly interact with each other the stronger the further the qvarks are from each other?

 

The argument that the qvarks interact stronger when they are further away from each other is not logical nor scientifical.

 

”The gluons that moderate strong nuclear power have been observed in particle accelerators”.

 

How does the gluon moderate the gravitation from one qvark to another?

How does the gluon loosen from the qvark?

Why does the gluon move towards another qvark?

How does the gluon make the qvark that is impacted by a gluon to move itself to the same direction from where the gluon itself is coming?

How does the gluon effect the qvark stronger if the qvark is further away from the qvark where the gluon started it´s journey?

 

 

In fact the qvark explodes and causes internal pressure to the qvark and this pressure makes qvark to squeeze energy as waves that have the nature of gluons. One example of this theory we have in a shape of guns.

 

The expanding qvarks have interaction with each other so to say push themselves away from each other the less the further the qvarks from each other are located. This happens because from the qvarks the waves moving forward like in a surface of a ball impact less waves to a qvark nearby when qvark nearby is located further and so on.

 

So the expanding qvarks can not in any point push themselves away from each other so firmly that they would begin to move further away from each other faster than they expand. When the pushing decreases, relatively the expanding makes the qvarks to reach out for each other even though the qvarks don´t move towards each other.

 

The gluon does not go to the next qvark and tell it to go in a direction where I just came..

 

No, the gluon impacts the qvark and makes the energy in that side of the qvark to alter faster into a less dense energy. With this energy the expanding qvark pushes itself away from that expanding qvark where the gluon came ect.

 

One could assume that a scientifical theory would have even some kind of logicality! The theory of an firm interaction between qvarks is not logical, because the qvarks do not interact stronger with each other the further they are from each other. That´s a fact!

 

The qvarks also absorb in other words fill up all the time more raw material (=energy) from where everything consits of. This way the recycling of an energy continues in a space that allready exists and does not alter in any ways!

 

 

 

The atomcores that transform into a less dense energy control each others trasformation into a less dense energy with an energy that radiates from themselves.

 

The stars that transform into a less dense energy control each others trasformation into a less dense energy with an energy that the stars radiate towards each other.

 

The galaxies that transform into a less dense energy control each others

trasformation into a less dense energy with an energy that the galaxies radiate towards each other.

 

The groups of galaxies that transform into a less dense energy control each others trasformation into a less dense energy with an energy that they radiate towards each other.

 

The particules (like photons and neutrinos) that transform into a less dense energy control each others transformation with and energy that the neutrinos and the photons radiate towards each other.

 

The particules that transform into a less dense energy control the transformation of the atomcores that the particules radiate towards the atomcores.

 

This way the omega is excactly one all the time!

 

The space really does not curve or bend!

 

The density of an eternal energy transforms in a ever lasting space that does not transform!

[buddha elämuni]

Hello Conan O Brien

YouTube - Etimespace's Channel[/url]

 

Hello Jim Carrey

YouTube - Etimespace's Channel[/url]

 

Hello Madonna

YouTube - Etimespace's Channel[/url]

 

 

 

Scientific experiments

 

The argument about the expanding space is an empty argument! There is no way

to make scientific experiments with a space. The argument about expanding

space is not science. It is a religion!

 

The thing that particules radiate their energy is not an empty claim.

Particules can be examined and make scientifical experiment with them and

this way proof this claim to be true.

 

Let´s take long chutes from different materials into the space and place

telescopes to them to observe some known place of a star. If the energy that

comes to the chutes makes the photons moving in the chute to bend towards

the chute, we can this way observe that this star concerned seems to be in a

different place than it is known to be!

 

The sun does not curve the space. The energy coming towards the sun makes

photons passing by the sun to bend towards the sun, because the hot / thick,

small and little exterior surface possessing particules do not interact with

the photons passing by the sun!

 

Even Einstein once told us that the massive the object is, the slower the

time is.

 

In relation to the size of a star there is much more energy / substance in

the stars than in the photons. The substance / energy is denser in the stars

than what it is in the photons. The time of the stars is so slower than the

time of the photons!

 

This way the time of the old photons is faster than the time of the new

photons and the photons radiating from the stars do not tranfer their

kinetic energy to the photons passing by the star as much as the photons

coming towards the star do. This way the light bends at the same time it

passes the star without supposedly the star would bend the space!

[freeztar]

Hello Conan O Brien

 

Hello Jim Carrey

 

Hello Madonna

I'm quite sure that most people searching for these people are not interested in the expanding universe.

 

Scientific experiments

 

The argument about the expanding space is an empty argument! There is no way

to make scientific experiments with a space. The argument about expanding

space is not science. It is a religion!

 

You are not making much sense and I have tried to understand your arguments against expanding space. Please provide some sources for your claims. That will help in everyone's understanding of what you are trying to say.

[UncleAl]

Illucid and inappropriate.

[buddha elämuni]

Dark Energy

 

The energy does not interact with the space in anyway! The space does not alter in any way.

The eternally excisting space does not expand, curve, roll, bang, stretch or foam!

 

According to the onesimpleprinciple model there occures a lot of such energy that effects the energy of the atomcores and makes the energy in a core to expand in other words to alter with accelerating speed into a less dense energy.

 

The atomcores absorb that energy also towards themselves. This is how the atomcores that expand all the time have enough energy to radiate the energy as waves and these waves have the nature of electrons and particules!

 

The energy of a visible universe originates from the objects that exicist really far outiside the visible universe. Those objects explode and radiate energywaves that have the nature of galaxies.

 

The galaxies are huge particules that explode and radiate energywaves that have the nature of atoms.The energy of all stars originare from enormeous energy consentrations of the galaxy centres!

The galaxies come to existence from inside to outside in other words from the centre to outward.

 

In the end all the energy of a visible universe has scattered smoothly in to a space. In some point the energy that has altered smooth begins to meet old galaxies and operates as so called dark energy in other words makes the energy of the galaxies that the energy meets to alter in an accelerating speed into a less dense energy ect.

 

Also the galaxies of the visible universe meet smoothly into a slightly dence altered energy.

This energy is remains of truly old galaxy energy. Is has moved through an enormeous emptiness within thousands of millions years. Within this time that energy has exploded in other words altered smoothly into a less dense energy in a eternal space that already exists.

 

Every single qvark in a visible universe meets that energy equally smoothly all the time.

 

In a moment the energy of a visible universe can move away from a space where the energy of a visible universe exists now and in a next moment away from a space where the energy of a visible universe just moved ect.

 

I can just imagine how much the qvarks are all the time able to absorb themselves more energy from the energy that has scattered smoothly and moves against the energy of the visible universe. That energy flaps in a moment through the visible universe and it absorbs all the time energy to the qvarks of the visible universe.

 

That is the so called dark energy that makes the substance to expand with an accelerating speed. It does not impact with the space in any way.

 

The space does not expand, curve or roll!

 

The density of an eternal energy varies in an eternal space that does not change in any way!

 

You must forget all about expanding space. The expanding of a space can not be proven scientifically! And you can not make a scientific experiment with the space! The argument of an empty space is an empty argument. More empty than the argument of the guardian angels!

 

.

[HydrogenBond]

Space-time is not a thing, by definition. Rather these are reference variables. Because they are defined as reference variables, the only thing that is expanding is the reference we have created in the mind and not real things. If they were real things, real things would be expanding and not just a reference grid of the mind.

 

Say we had a balloon of hydrogen, which we ignite. It will explode. We normally use a fixed reference to look at this. If we decided to make our space-time reference expand, on paper, and look at the same balloon exploding, we can do that with math. This would make it look like the balloon is expanding slower, since the expanding space-time reference is compensating for some of the motion. We can expand our space-time reference, to a critical level, to make the explosion look stationary, so the coordinate positions of the fragments from the explosion, hardly change position on our expanding space-time grid. This version of expanding space-time, could be used create a kinder and gentler reality of nothing able to explode. Things that stay stationary, now appear to come together as one within this reference. It is a nice universe.

 

With our hydrogen balloon, we know it exploded and it gave off energy. But the expanding reference, in that kinder universe, makes it look like only heat was given off but without any kinetic energy. Where did this extra energy go, that would be seen on a traditional fixed grid reference? We may need to postulate a mysterious energy sink to maintain our moveable reference in the land of kind explosions. Maybe another dimension will be needed or some type of mysterious substance into which the energy converts but we can't yet see in the lab. But we know it has to be there due to the conservation of energy. Certain thing become a necessary condition to maintain that reference.

[buddha elämuni]

Let´s think with a thought!

 

Let´s think about the giant energy concentarions of our galaxies centres(they are also called as huge black holes) and how they once flaped from one size larger energy concentarions that locate really far outside the visible universe!

 

This way they were already far away from each other and the space did not have to expand “inflantionally”.

 

With time the stars were born out of the energy waves that the giant energy concentrations of the galaxy centres radiate and which have the nature of the atoms. At the same time as the substance and the time of this new substance were born, this energy moved in a space that already excisted and which does not expand or curve!

 

Our time is extremely slow in relation to the speed of movement in which the substance / energy of the visible universe move in a space that already excists.

 

And when the stars began to radiate their energy, the energy started to move as particules in an area between the galaxies ect.

 

Now let´s think that energy of the visible universe would begin to meet corresponding galaxies

in a 90 degree angle.

 

Naturally towards those galaxies would hit energy coming from the stars of the visible universe.

So this energy did not once move in an area between the galaxy “seeds”.

 

In an area between the particules radiating from the stars does not move energy which could hit the particules passing the star!

 

In an area whre the particules come towards the star this energy moves and it hits towards the photons passing the star and this is how the light bends!

 

Energy concentarions orbit of movement changes, accelerates or slows down only when the energy of an energy concentration alters faster than normally in the other side than in the other into a less dense energy .

 

 

The Velocity

 

Let´s think about a ship that is one light second long and moves throuhg the whole visible universe nearly in a speed of light. The time of the ship is so slow that during that time only one second of the ships time passes by!

 

How many journeys of the ships length does the ship move in one ships second?

 

The oldest light of the visible universe has moved from the farest destination of the visible universe

towards us and at the same time all the material / energy of the visible universe (also that oldest light) has been able to move during one of our seconds in a similar way as the ship that moved in one ships second truly many times the same journey as its own length is!

 

Our time is simply so unthinkably slow in relation to that velocity in which all the material / energy of the visible universe moves in a space that allready excists.

 

And of course the light that moves into a direction in which all the energy / material of the visible universe pushes itself, moves with a fastest speed into that same direction, may it be a hunch faster!

 

.

[Pyrotex]

I DEMAND LOGICALITY...

The expanding qvarks have interaction with each other so to say push themselves away from each other the less the further the qvarks from each other are located. This happens because from the qvarks the waves moving forward like in a surface of a ball impact less waves to a qvark nearby when qvark nearby is located further and ... !

I think you WISH you had logicality.

And it is so obvious that you do NOT have it.

Your ranting, as exampled by the paragraph above, is so illogical and incoherent as to be unreadable.

Please get back on your meds.

 

Pyrotex / Moderator