Whether I have made opening?

[Krupin]

Sorry. Perhaps, I incorrectly translated the Russian word «адвокат». In Russia this word has a value of counsel and defender (in court). I want to say that I’ll defend the Jupiter. I want to remove from Jupiter the stigma of a destroyer of planets (for instance Phaeton) and prove that it, by contrast, is the chief architect of our solar system. It pointed out (by means of its gravitational effects) where other planets would be located. It has contributed to their formation.

 

I think almost all readers understand what I mean. But in any case give the first available link. http://www.universetoday.com/guide-to-space/mars/was-there-a-planet-between-mars-and-jupiter/

[Krupin]

I shall continue the exposition of my theory

 

Theoretically my orbital resonances (I shell call they the orbital resonance 2-nd type) could appear when the Solar system was born or in time the following evolution. But the second variant is clear doubtful.

 

We assume that the resonances - a consequence of the formation of the solar system. Only in times when the planets have not yet been, asteroids could fly between Jupiter and the orbit is not born of Venus, in some odd way contributing to its formation.

 

I shall illustrate the idea on a following example. Behind a planet the Neptune is a belt of asteroids (Kuiper Belt) in which there is family Plutino which cycle time makes 3/2 periods of the Neptune. The greatest member of this family is Pluto, which is recently degraded of planet to an dwarf planet.

 

Pluto (and many other members of its family) moves so, that in the perihelion it concern orbit of the Neptune. If in the aphelion of Pluto’s orbit there was another planet, the situation described by my formula would just be realized.

 

No, I do not trust in existence of planet X. I assume, that to its creation have prevented any circumstances. Possibly it is the limited sizes protoplanetary disk (shortage of a building material behind an orbit of the Neptune) and shortage of time (to the beginning of construction of planet X the газо-dust disk has dissipated).

[Krupin]

But what is a role, which could play a "bridging" asteroids? They were not too many, then to form a planet. And the impact velocity of the asteroid, which has an elongated orbit to the celestial body with a circular orbit is too high. The asteroid likely would split the growing planet, than join to it.

 

On this question there is a paradoxical response. High impacts of those asteroids were useful for the formation of planets just because crushing them, preventing premature to shrink into a single monolithic body.

 

With a relatively small asteroid hit the planet falling apart gravitationally bound in a swarm of small bodies. As the swarm has held many times more, it absorbs the dust and gas much faster than the monolithic planet.

[Krupin]

There is unresolved the important question. Asteroids flying between the orbits of the planets divide the celestial bodies throughout the inter-orbit space. Why does planets form precisely at perihelion and aphelion of asteroids’ orbits?

 

The answer to this question: In circular orbits of aphelion and perihelion of the asteroid’s orbit asteroid holds much more time than in the any other intermediate orbit. Just a stone thrown up lives at the upper point longer than in the interim. So resonant asteroids have a greater activating effect to bodies, moving in circular orbits at the aphelion and perihelion.

[Krupin]

System Kepler-11 has an interesting pattern. Let's say, between the outermost planet and one of the internal appeals asteroid. Then the asteroid and the outermost planet are in orbital resonance. These resonances 2 : 3 ; 3 : 5 ; 4 : 9 ; 1 : 2 . The first three resonances are such that the denominator is odd, and the numerator = (denominator + 1) / 2. There is a missing 4: 7. There it may exist another planet.