Qfwfq Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 (which intentionally have nothing to do with perpetual motion machines)Actually, at least the triangle one has something quite substantially to do with the typical contraption which supposedly gives an output without consuming some other energy. Very often the obvious difference is exactly equal to another one which is simply less obvious to spot, but cleans up the mismatch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemit Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 So, if you claim to have created a perpetual motion machine, you must be able to demonstrate that you have built such a machine and it has worked in perpetuity. That's pretty much what's required of any other new technology: that it can be shown to do what it is designed to do. --lemit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.