Tormod Posted November 22, 2009 Report Posted November 22, 2009 A group of researchers at the City College of New York is developing a new way to generate power for planes and automobiles based on materials known as piezoelectrics, which convert the kinetic energy of motion into electricity. They will present their concept later this month at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Physical Society's (APS) Division of Fluid Dynamics will take place from November 22-24 at the Minneapolis Convention Center. About a half-inch by one inch in size, these devices might be mounted on the roof or tail of a car or on an airplane fuselage where they would vibrate inside a flow, producing an output voltage. The power generated would not be enough to replace that supplied by the combustion engines, but it could run some system -- such as batteries that would be used to charge control panels and other small electronic devices such as mobile phones. Led by CCNY professor Yiannis Andreopoulos, the researchers are currently attempting to optimize these devices by modeling the physical forces to which they are subjected in different air flows -- on the roof of a car, for instance, or on the back of a truck. When the device is placed in the wake of a cylinder -- such as on the back of a truck -- the flow of air will cause the devices to vibrate in resonance, says Andreopoulos. On the roof of car, they will shake in a much more unsteady flow known as a turbulent boundary layer. In Minneapolis, Andreopoulos and his colleagues will present wind tunnel data showing how the devices work in both situations. "These devices open the possibility to continuously scavenge otherwise wasted energy from the environment," says Andreopoulos. Source Quote
Pyrotex Posted November 24, 2009 Report Posted November 24, 2009 Okay.But will it produce electricity more efficiently than, say, putting a propellor in the external airflow?? And for equal amounts of electricity made, will it cause less drag than the propellor? If the answers are 'no', then it's a waste of time. Quote
JMJones0424 Posted November 25, 2009 Report Posted November 25, 2009 Pyrotex- I don't think that your comment recognizes the point of this device. The point is not to produce electricity efficiently, as your post suggests, but rather to make use of the inefficiencies created by turbulence and drag as a body moves through air. While small, the energy produced would then be essentially "free" (except for the cost and maintenance of the generator). And if the generator helped to smooth out the turbulence behind a tractor-trailer or some similarly large, far from aerodynamic moving body, then the generator could have a net positive effect on mileage while providing a (very?) small amount of electricity. In the case of planes, I think it would make more sense to increase aerodynamics than to make use of inefficiencies that arise because of turbulence. To be useful, of course, the device would need to be exceedingly cheap. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.