The Theory of Eventuality

[Southtown]

Perpetual acceleration toward causality.

[Southtown]

Perpetual acceleration of complexity, from the infinite to the infinitesimal.

[Southtown]

In a sea of potential, relative areas of entropy become nodes (entities) in a matrix of reciprocity, and causality becomes relative to interaction.

[Southtown]

The orthogonal axis of in/out expanding by infinite multiplicity.

[Southtown]

relative outer vacuum, relative inner complexity.

[Southtown]

complexity times complexity is manifest as increased quantization vector toward interaction

[Southtown]

I don't think I'm getting any traffic. Cuz I sure as hell know you guys can shut me down, or ask the right questions, at least to make me think. I've acquired a taste for sharp critizism. Please...

[Southtown]

One theory is the reciprocal of the other, and reality is perspective.

[Southtown]

Which theory you ask? Why, the only 'other' certainty is 'anti' certainty.

[snoopdogg]

It’s not perspective your searching for, it is perception. Energy, Space and Time, do not co-exist or interact with each other, they are all simply the same thing. Perspective comes from viewing things from different origins; however perception is the ability to view things all together.

[Southtown]

Quantization is the aftermath of entropy.

[Southtown]

It’s not perspective your searching for, it is perception. Energy, Space and Time, do not co-exist or interact with each other, they are all simply the same thing.

You may be right. lol

 

Actually, I would say that they all appear simultaneous from any singular frame of reference.

 

Perspective comes from viewing things from different origins; however perception is the ability to view things all together.

All interaction happens between and amongst disparate frames of reference.

 

...even within the entities.

[Southtown]

Quantization exists as imperceptible past.

[Southtown]

Perceptible violation of continuity.

[Southtown]

If only I hadn't looked...

[lawcat]

nothing can be fully described which is not described in terms of birth and death, or coming into (relative) existence and out.

ST

 

Well, there is an exception. I can fully describe the bottle on my table without knowing anything about is birth or death. I can fully describe my hair without knowing its birth or death. I can fully describe assets, liabilities and profits of a company without knowing its birth or death. Snapshots in time describe things fully without any need for knowing birth or death.

Conversely, I may not know anything about something if I only have information about its birth or death.

Now, if you want to say: no life can be fully described withoutif not described in terms of birth and death; then I may agree.

 

If theory of eventuality is a theory of events, and if events are durations, and if durations describe life, and if life must contain birth and death, then eventuality rests on birth and death.

[Southtown]

Well, there is an exception. I can fully describe the bottle on my table without knowing anything about is birth or death. I can fully describe my hair without knowing its birth or death. I can fully describe assets, liabilities and profits of a company without knowing its birth or death. Snapshots in time describe things fully without any need for knowing birth or death.

Conversely, I may not know anything about something if I only have information about its birth or death.

Now, if you want to say: no life can be fully described withoutif not described in terms of birth and death; then I may agree.

Well there is an exception ... lol Being perceived and being described are precisely two separate things (practically reciprocal ... relatively speaking.)