Errors and Omissions of the CODATA and the Planck Constants

[kawil]

Hi, Everybody

 

Please, consider my recent work entitled, "Errors and Omissions of the CODATA and the Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants".

 

In this brief study, selected CODATA fundamental physical constants are researched in an effort to identify the implied computational foundations that serve as a basis for deriving the Planck constants. The Planck constants are reverse engineered as of the CODATA recommendations. Various Earth/matriX Tables of the Planck Constants illustrate the terms and numerical values that derive each Planck constant listed in the CODATA. The derivations are accomplished, not through the CODATA symbolic formulae, but rather based upon the fundamental physical constants.

 

Initially, I had hoped to understand the computational procedure that Max Planck may have used to derive the numerical values of his constants. During my studies, I came to distinguish how Max Planck may have derived his values, and problems with the CODATA numerical values for the Planck Constants. I had not expected to find any errors or omissions in the CODATA, but that is what my research has ultimately uncovered.

 

In this regard, various errors and omissions in the CODATA values are identified and discussed in my study, a few of which are the following:

- A numerical contradiction between Planck's constant [6.62606896] and the other nine constants

- The omission of listing the Planck implied energy constant [1.956084456 fractal];

- The incorrect assignment of the symbolic formula to Planck energy [1.220892]

- An omission of an identifiable conversion constant [1.2316143]

- The failure to identify alternate constant numerical values as of the root expressions in the key symbolic formulae depending on the unit of measurement;

- An inconsistency in the use of constant numerical values for Planck implied mass [ 3.387040993 and 3.487040993] in five Planck constants.

 

Proposals are offered for adjusting the CODATA Planck constants in terms of their numerical values, as well as, how some of the errors may be addressed. The omissions identified in the book speak for themselves and suggest being included in the CODATA. Numerous other proposals are made, all of which are based on the numerical values of the CODATA.

 

Excerpts from the book have been posted on the Internet:

 

The Planck Constants Based on the Fundamental Physical Constants

 

Thank you for your attention and I would appreciate any feedback that you may wish to offer me in my research efforts, as that is the only way to improve one's work.

My best,

Charles

Charles William Johnson