Rade Posted June 2, 2010 Report Posted June 2, 2010 I will define "scientific philosophy" as "to think as if you know". (let us then define knowledge as "to have a mental grasp of the fact(s) of reality" and reality as "that which exists"). All mental grasps are understood with a degree of uncertainty. The argument ultimately derives from the axiom "existence exists". Thus, to hold a scientific philosophy is to think as if you have an uncertain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists. Conversely, to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you do NOT have an uncertain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists. Any comments ? Quote
jedaisoul Posted June 7, 2010 Report Posted June 7, 2010 Thus, to hold a scientific philosophy is to think as if you have an uncertain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists.This is simply a restatement of your assumptions. It does not explain why you use the word "scientific" to decribe this philosophy. Conversely, to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you do NOT have an uncertain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists.This is a double negative. Did you mean: a) "to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you have a certain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists" or... :naughty: "to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you have an uncertain understanding of the fact(s) of that which does not exist" or... c) "to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you do NOT have a certain understanding of the fact(s) of that which does not exist", or what??? :hihi: Quote
Rade Posted June 8, 2010 Author Report Posted June 8, 2010 This is simply a restatement of your assumptions. It does not explain why you use the word "scientific" to describe this philosophy.Did you mean:a) "to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you have a certain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists" Thanks for comments. Yes, I did not define "science". Science means "to know", philosophy means "to think". As to your second comment, true, it is a negative proposition, I like best as replacement your (a) = "to hold a non-scientific philosophy is to think as if you have a certain understanding of the fact(s) of that which exists" Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.